[OSList] OST: Public vs Private events: apples and oranges?

Sun Apr 26 09:12:30 PDT 2015

To add a bit... The 4 (actually 5) "preconditions" were simply what I, and
others, had observed to be the situation. I can't actually remember, but I
think my original motivation was to question what seemed to be the
conventional wisdom regarding what it took to have a good meeting. I think
we all know the drill - there should be a clear agenda, closely ordered
procedure, something close to absolute control, and the like. With thoughts
like these in mind, Open Space was not only counterintuitive, but wrong,
dangerous, and obviously heretical. What we were experiencing was definitely
a horse of a different color. 

And yes, Jeff, there is certainly no "requirement" that all conditions be at
maximum red alert. That said, if none are present there would seem to be
little reason have a meeting, let alone Open Space. After all who would want
to waste the time when there was no business issue, everything was crystal
clear, everyone thought exactly the same way, no passion or conflict, and
the sense of urgency non-existent? Sounds like a non-starter to me. Then
again it constantly amazes me that every day in organizations all over the
world folks hold meetings just because you are supposed to. Is it any wonder
that people are bored, disengaged, and cynical?

But actually what really got me excited was when I realized that my "5
Preconditions" almost exactly paralleled the essential preconditions for
self organization as described by Stuart Kauffmann and others. That made a
connection which produced my greatest learning in and about Open Space. It
is all self organization. It is not a process we/I created, invented, or
whatever. All we actually "do" is to invite people to remember what they
have been doing for ever. Well at least for the last 13.7 billion years. 

And just for a tag line .... to those who might be thinking about "scaling
up" Open Space, I would suggest you save your energy. It's already happened.
It is all self organizing. It is all open space. Of course it is true that
things get pretty sloppy and gooey when we set about organizing a self
organizing system. Oh well.

Harrison

Winter Address

7808 River Falls Drive

Potomac, MD 20854

301-365-2093

Summer Address

189 Beaucaire Ave.

Camden, ME 04843

207-763-3261

Websites

www.openspaceworld.com

www.ho-image.com

OSLIST To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of
OSLIST Go
to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

From: OSList [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org] On Behalf Of
Jeff Aitken via OSList
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 11:31 AM
To: Daniel Mezick; World wide Open Space Technology email list
Subject: Re: [OSList] OST: Public vs Private events: apples and oranges?

Hi Daniel. When Harrison's four conditions came out way back when, I
imagined them as a way to tell a client that even in the most challenging
situation it's quite possible that Open Space will work very well. In other
words, don't hesitate to consider it, even if you're afraid things are just
too messy to try this strange new process.

Having hosted and seen many great open spaces in which the scores were low,
so to speak,  I never took seriously that these are absolute preconditions.
To me they are a kind of inoculation against a prospective sponsor being
afraid to make that phone call or send that email. 

With lots of appreciation for your good work

Jeff

Lagunitas, California

-------- Original message --------
From: Daniel Mezick via OSList 
Date:04/26/2015 6:20 AM (GMT-08:00) 
To: World wide Open Space Technology email list 
Subject: [OSList] OST: Public vs Private events: apples and oranges? 

Greetings All,

...I notice these well-worn, well-understood set of starting conditions for
great Open Space, on Wikipedia...hmm...

<WIKIPEDIA>
Hundreds of Open Space meetings have been documented.[4]
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Space_Technology#cite_note-4> [5]
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Space_Technology#cite_note-5>  Harrison
Owen explains that this approach works best when these conditions are
present,[3]
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Space_Technology#cite_note-OST-3>  namely
high levels of

1.	Complexity, in terms of the tasks to be done or outcomes achieved;
2.	Diversity, in terms of the people involved and/or needed to make any
solution work;
3.	Conflict, real or potential, meaning people really care about the
central issue or purpose; and
4.	Urgency, meaning that the time to act was "yesterday".

</WIKIPEDIA>

In an organization, we could work with formally authorized leaders to gauge
the magnitude of each dimension. So for example we could gauge or rank the
magnitude, with 1 being lowest and 10 being the highest magnitude for
gauging each dimension. For a really nice opportunity to use Open Space, we
might be looking for a combined score of, say, 32 or higher (out of a
possible 40)

The Public Conference Event

Now let's consider the PUBLIC conference event. What is the typical combined
score in a public conference... for these 4 elements? I am guessing the
combined score is something like 20 or lower for the typical conference
event. Maybe 25 out of a perfect 40? The cohesion is just (generally
speaking!) so much lower in a public vs org-based (private) event...

<HERESY>
And that is why I think OST is for "development and transformation in
organizations" (that actual subtitle of the SPIRIT book) and that it is not
at all as effective, in terms of impact, when implemented in a public
conference. 
</HERESY>

I am guessing the scores for the 4 dimensions are almost always be lower in
a public vs. private event. 

Certainly that is my general subjective observation, based on a small sample
of direct experience (less than 20 experiences doing OST inside
corporations...)

...Yes: some exceptions do exist. As is almost always the case. Right? That
said, I feel these exceptions prove the general rule... that private events
have a much higher combined score, all else being equal.

Ironically, the OST format was originally formulated to ease the effort
required to arrange and execute public conference events. 

And then....

Daniel 

-- 

Daniel Mezick, President

New Technology Solutions Inc.

(203) 915 7248 (cell)

Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/> .  <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>
Blog.  <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/> Twitter. 

Examine my new book:   <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>
The Culture Game : Tools for the Agile Manager.

Explore Agile Team  <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/>
Training and  <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
Coaching.

Explore the  <http://newtechusa.net/user-groups/ma/> Agile Boston Community.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20150426/600be0d9/attachment-0003.htm>