[OSList] OST: Public vs Private events: apples and oranges?

[Jeff Aitken via OSList]

Hi Daniel. When Harrison's four conditions came out way back when, I imagined them as a way to tell a client that even in the most challenging situation it's quite possible that Open Space will work very well. In other words, don't hesitate to consider it, even if you're afraid things are just too messy to try this strange new process.

Having hosted and seen many great open spaces in which the scores were low, so to speak,  I never took seriously that these are absolute preconditions. To me they are a kind of inoculation against a prospective sponsor being afraid to make that phone call or send that email. 

With lots of appreciation for your good work

Jeff
Lagunitas, California




-------- Original message --------
From: Daniel Mezick via OSList <oslist at lists.openspacetech.org> 
Date:04/26/2015  6:20 AM  (GMT-08:00) 
To: World wide Open Space Technology email list <oslist at lists.openspacetech.org> 
Subject: [OSList]  OST: Public vs Private events: apples and oranges? 

Greetings All,

...I notice these well-worn, well-understood set of starting conditions for great Open Space, on Wikipedia...hmm...

<WIKIPEDIA>
Hundreds of Open Space meetings have been documented.[4][5] Harrison Owen explains that this approach works best when these conditions are present,[3] namely high levels of

Complexity, in terms of the tasks to be done or outcomes achieved;
Diversity, in terms of the people involved and/or needed to make any solution work;
Conflict, real or potential, meaning people really care about the central issue or purpose; and
Urgency, meaning that the time to act was "yesterday".
</WIKIPEDIA>


In an organization, we could work with formally authorized leaders to gauge the magnitude of each dimension. So for example we could gauge or rank the magnitude, with 1 being lowest and 10 being the highest magnitude for gauging each dimension. For a really nice opportunity to use Open Space, we might be looking for a combined score of, say, 32 or higher (out of a possible 40)



The Public Conference Event

Now let's consider the PUBLIC conference event. What is the typical combined score in a public conference... for these 4 elements? I am     guessing the combined score is something like 20 or lower for the typical conference event. Maybe 25 out of a perfect 40? The cohesion is just (generally speaking!) so much lower in a public vs org-based (private) event...


<HERESY>
And that is why I think OST is for "development and transformation in organizations" (that actual subtitle of the SPIRIT book) and that it is not at all as effective, in terms of impact, when implemented in a public conference. 
</HERESY>

I am guessing the scores for the 4 dimensions are almost always be lower in a public vs. private event. 

Certainly that is my general subjective observation, based on a small sample of direct experience (less than 20 experiences doing OST inside corporations...)

...Yes: some exceptions do exist. As is almost always the case. Right? That said, I feel these exceptions prove the general rule... that private events have a much higher combined score, all else being equal.

Ironically, the OST format was originally formulated to ease the effort required to arrange and execute public conference events. 

And then....


Daniel 


-- 
Daniel Mezick, President
New Technology Solutions Inc.
(203) 915 7248 (cell)
Bio. Blog. Twitter. 
Examine my new book:  The Culture Game : Tools for the Agile Manager.
Explore Agile Team Training and Coaching.
Explore the Agile Boston Community. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20150426/22fee4ea/attachment-0003.htm>