[OSList] The OST Game
Harold Shinsato
harold at shinsato.com
Thu Oct 24 10:11:42 PDT 2013
Phelim,
Thanks so much for responding to the mention of the work of James P.
Carse again. It's such an elegant, simple, and yet profound book. Many
of the simplest sentences in the book almost sound like poetry.
"A finite game is played for the purpose of winning, an infinite game
for the purpose of continuing the play."
Jane McGonical, author of "Reality is Broken" was aware of Carse's work
and quotes his distinction between finite and infinite games. However,
there are finite games where no one person has to win. Alistair
Cockburn, in his book "Agile Software Development", has a chart which
lists 3 categories of games:
1. finite, goal-directed games
2. finite, non-goal directed games
3. infinite games.
Interestingly, in the finite goal-directed he includes software
development. Because even in this realm of finite goal-directed games,
there doesn't have to be a single winner. Software Development, perhaps
like an Open Space Technology conference, is a *NON-ZEROSUM GAME*.
Alistair calls Software Development a "cooperative game of invention and
communication". An open space conference can also be seen as a finite
cooperative game. Maybe there is no goal we all can declare victory
with, but there's a theme, a purpose.
Carse's work justifiably pillories the dreadful win/lose zero-sum game
philosophy prevalent in society. But I don't think Carse is trying to
eliminate goal seeking games. In fact, he even seems to be opposed to
getting rid of evil. "Evil arises in the honored belief that history can
be tidied up, brought to a sensible conclusion... Infinite players
recognize the inescapable likelihood of evil. They therefore do not try
to eliminate evil in others, for to do so is the very impulse of evil
itself, and therefore a contradiction."
But here's the real zinger of that chapter, "Evil is not the inclusion
of finite games in an infinite game, but the restriction of all play to
one or another finite game."
The greater self-organizing principles and practice and philosophy of
Open Space Technology solidly resides in the realm of the one infinite
game, the game of life itself. And a well played Open Space conference,
we'll all be infinite players, also playing a finite game and there will
be many other invites to play finite games - as a butterfly that
attracts a butterfly session or conversation, or as a regular session
convener who announces in the circle and posts something on the wall.
Another example of a finite game serving an infinite one - we have the
example of improv games. A good improv instructor brings in games to
help the troupe or students advance in their infinite game of just
getting better at improvisation. Yet, the games usually have a clear
beginning and ending, wierd goals and objectives and rules. But the ends
are always ultimately playing in the field of the infinite game. Of
getting better.
Sorry to poke Jane's ideas again into this forum - but it feels so much
in the spirit of Open Space to mention that one of Jane's most powerful
influences is Bernie DeKoven. Bernie was involved in a sort of social
movement in the seventies called the New Games movement. The purpose of
that movement was to "reinvent sports to be more cooperative, more
social, and more inclusive." Bernie was one of the authors in 1976 of
the out of print "New Games Book". Bernie is a "leading play theorist"
still today. He's very fond of cooperative non-zero sum games. The
article of Bernie's that Jane read so often the page in her copy of the
book is very worn is "Creating the Play Community". In many ways, Jane's
book is an attempt to revive this cooperative and inclusive spirit of
that New Games movement - as part of the greater infinite game of life -
in the spirit and presence of community.
And this is the same infinite game of life, that Open Space Technology
has contributed so elegantly and beautifully to. I'm grateful to see us
starting to notice each other - us wonderful infinite players. Be it in
games, agile, or open space facilitation.
Harold
On 10/23/13 2:15 PM, Phelim McDermott wrote:
> Hi Paul and all
>
> ....also here we come back to Carse's distinction between a finite and
> an infinite game.
>
> A finite game has a goal..... to win. (Our predominant culture)
> an infinite game is played for the pleasure of the game itself..
>
> if life were played for the infinite game as apposed to the finite
> game our society would be different..
>
> this is Carse's thesis as I understand it.
>
> I think when i discovered OST i realised it was the infinite game
> possibility that flirted with my interest.
>
> however as Carse says an infinite game can easily and often is played
> as a finite game..
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Phelim McDermott
>
> ________________________________
>
> I generally pick up emails only at the beginning and end of the
> working day. I am currently aiming to respond the following day. If it
> is urgent please call me on 07956 187298.
> _____________________________________
>
> www.improbable.co.uk <http://www.improbable.co.uk>
> @openspacer
>
>
> On 21 Oct 2013, at 22:46, paul levy <paul at cats3000.net
> <mailto:paul at cats3000.net>> wrote:
>
>> Or maybe goal setting is just another gorgeous example of the mystery
>> of self-organisation ?
>>
>> Those who cannot hear the music think that the dancer is mad...
>>
>> Warm wishes
>> Paul Levy
>>
>> On Monday, 21 October 2013, Harrison Owen wrote:
>>
>> John I like what you say... and given the (only) two conclusions
>> I have managed to reach after all these years: A) All systems are
>> open. B) All systems are self organizing... the devil draws me to
>> a third conclusion. Goal seeking systems are purely a figment of
>> our imagination created in a desperate attempt to satisfy our
>> unending (and futile) need for control. You know the scenario. We
>> (I) created it, We (I) set the goals, We (I) control... Lovely
>> idea, but it never happened and never will. Of course, that is
>> all pure speculation and heresy.
>>
>> Harrison
>>
>> Harrison Owen
>>
>> 7808 River Falls Dr. <x-apple-data-detectors://2>
>>
>> Potomac, MD 20854 <x-apple-data-detectors://3>
>>
>> USA
>>
>> 189 Beaucaire Ave. <x-apple-data-detectors://4> (summer)
>>
>> Camden, Maine 04843 <x-apple-data-detectors://5>
>>
>> Phone 301-365-2093 <tel:301-365-2093>
>>
>> (summer) 207-763-3261 <tel:207-763-3261>
>>
>> www.openspaceworld.com <http://www.openspaceworld.com%20>
>>
>> www.ho-image.com <http://www.ho-image.com%20> (Personal Website)
>>
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives
>> of OSLIST Go
>> to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>
>> *From:*oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org <javascript:_e({},
>> 'cvml', 'oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org');>
>> [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org <javascript:_e({},
>> 'cvml', 'oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org');>] *On Behalf
>> Of *John Watkins
>> *Sent:* Monday, October 21, 2013 11:19 AM
>> *To:* World wide Open Space Technology email list
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSList] The OST Game
>>
>> I don't think self organizing systems are goal seeking systems.
>> By definition, goal seeking systems are homeostatic, and not
>> emergent or transformational. I think self organizing systems
>> are purpose seeking systems; hence, as Peggy says, always looking
>> for new meanings to emerge in a dialectic of emergence, but never
>> settling into any one final "eternal return," like "strange
>> attractors," always wobbling into new versions of themselves. I
>> think the question of game vs. not game might be solved by saying
>> emergent self organizing systems are systems at play, "lila" in
>> the tantric view, "the play of the goddess," indeterminate,
>> recursive, entangled, confounding traditional goal seeking or
>> linear causal or probabilistic behavior.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Oct 20, 2013, at 7:43 AM, Peggy Holman wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Great thread!
>>
>> To Paul's question
>>
>> what is the goal (if any) of self-organizing behavior?
>>
>> Harrison referenced one of Kauffman's conditions for
>> self-organizing -- the search for fitness.
>>
>> I believe that in human systems, the search for fitness looks
>> like a search for meaning.
>>
>> Harrison said:
>>
>> You don't have a self without a world, nor do you have a world
>> without selves. It is not one OR the other, but definitely a
>> both/and. Dialectic, polar, all at once. Nice I always thought.
>>
>>
>>
>> Nice thing about a search for meaning. It can start as a solo
>> act. And you may pick up friends along the way. Sometimes that
>> evolves into a movement (Agile, Open Space, etc.). And sometimes
>> it even disappears into a world view.
>>
>>
>>
>> Or not.
>>
>>
>> Peggy
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> 425-746-6274 <tel:425-746-6274>
>>
>> www.peggyholman.com <http://www.peggyholman.com/>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 15, 2013, at 3:59 AM, "Harrison Owen" <hhowen at verizon.net
>> <mailto:hhowen at verizon.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Dan said: : "what is the goal (if any) of self-organizing
>> behavior?" Good question indeed. Stuart Kaufmann (Biologist)
>> says that one of the conditions for self organization is what
>> he calls, "The search for fitness." I take this to be a
>> modification of Darwin's "Survival of the fittest." The idea
>> is that self organizing systems engage in a search for ways
>> to enhance the way they fit with the environment and fit
>> together internally. Those most fully aligned with the
>> environment, with all their parts engaged tend to survive.
>> Works for me.
>>
>> Harrison
>>
>> Harrison Owen<
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSList mailing list
>> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>> <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org>
>> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>> <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org>
>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
--
Harold Shinsato
harold at shinsato.com <mailto:harold at shinsato.com>
http://shinsato.com
twitter: @hajush <http://twitter.com/hajush>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20131024/d330e1c9/attachment-0008.htm>
More information about the OSList
mailing list