On self-organizing

[Jack Ricchiuto]

Harrison, drawing lines is interesting business, considering Buddhist teacher Thich Nhat Hahn's suggestion that there is no being, only interbeing. His practice is seeing the people in the objects and the objects in the people. When nothing exists by itself, it contains everything else - and so the respect for every quantum wave in the universal field.

Jack

~~~~~~~~~~
jack ricchiuto
two.one.six/three.seven.three/seven.four.seven.five
www.designinglife.com / www.appreciativeleadership.org 


------------Original Message------------
From: Harrison Owen <hhowen at comcast.net>
To: OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
Date: Tue, Feb-15-2005 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: On self-organizing
Masud -- I know the devil made me do it -- but when I saw your words, "For
instance, do we give more respect to "non-living" weapons systems or to
living "human systems"?" -- I found myself answering, "Human Systems, of
course, at least usually -- but what happens when the human systems are in
fact weapons systems? And where do you draw the line between them anyhow?

Harrison

Harrison Owen
7808 River Falls Drive
Potomac, Maryland   20845
Phone 301-365-2093

Open Space Training www.openspaceworld.com
Open Space Institute www.openspaceworld.org
Personal website http://mywebpages.comcast.net/hhowen/index.htm
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives Visit:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html



-----Original Message-----
From: OSLIST [mailto:OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU] On Behalf Of Masud
Sheikh
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:03 AM
To: OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
Subject: Re: On self-organizing

Filiz Telek wrote:
>Masud,
>
>I guess you are referring TV as non-living in the physical sense...well,
>doesn't it all depend on how we define living versus non-living? :)
>Maybe I am taking your comment too literally...but here are some quotes
>that might be interesting...
>
Thank you for the quotes, Filiz. You are right that I am talking only
about the physical TV set. And my comment that "perhaps I understand" was
related to the sort of quotes that you gave.

Of course, in one sense, "humans never die". Buried or cremated, they
change form, and in some way, feed the new cycle of life.

But does not there need to be a difference bertween the way we "treat"
living systems vs "non-living" systems? For instance, do we give more
respect to "non-living" weapons systems or to living "human systems"?
Masud

*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20050215/5177a681/attachment-0016.htm>