[OSList] Is there experience in developing Open Space further in organizations and networks after the initial intervention

[Harrison Owen]

Reflections? It took me a while to recognize that Open Space is not a method
that we might “do” or “impose” – rather it is a memory of what we already
possess. OS simply allows us to recall that we are all self-organizing
creatures – no matter how much we might like to think we are “in charge.”
The really ridiculous thing is that clients pay us (occasionally quite well)
for giving them something they already possess. But at 82, my ethics are
getting a little foggy. I did have a client one time who figured it out. He
said, “Harrison, you have the greatest con game going. You charge a
significant fee for something the people already have (but may not know it)
– and then you go and take a nap while they do exactly what they already
know how to do
” Keep those checks coming Baby! Of course, I am here in
Maine where the weather is warmish but wonderful
 and what would you say
about that?

 

Harrison

 

From: OSList [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org] On Behalf Of
Jan Hoglund via OSList
Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 2:21 AM
To: World wide Open Space Technology email list
Cc: Jan Hoglund
Subject: Re: [OSList] Is there experience in developing Open Space further
in organizations and networks after the initial intervention

 

Many thanks to Harrison Owen and Peggy Holman for sharing this — and to
Birgitt Williams, of course!

 

And now, twenty years and more later, what are your reflections?

 

/Jan Höglund, Sweden

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20180809/d5d520c0/attachment.html>