[OSList] on context [was Open Space in Charlottesville]

Michael M Pannwitz via OSList oslist at lists.openspacetech.org
Fri Sep 8 00:33:25 PDT 2017

Dear Raffi

I updated your World Map profile with the new picture you just sent, 
have a look
  > http://www.openspaceworldmap.org/worker/raffi-aftandelian

This great picture will help folks walking down Villa La Jolla Drive in 
La Jolla to spot you... or see you in the Mediterranean Restaurant 
across the street.

For you others in the World Map: The new version has a Content 
Management System that allows you to edit your entry all by yourself.

And, if you dont have a profiel there yet you are invited to include 
yourself, here is the entry
> http://www.openspaceworldmap.org/inclusion

Have a great day

Am 07.09.2017 um 16:59 schrieb Michael M Pannwitz:
> Dear Raffi,
> reading your last two lines it seems you are out of cents!
> Good to hear from you and from Birgitt at just about the same time.
> For 60 years I have been reading "The Progressive"... and for many years 
> I have the yearly "Hidden History of the United States" calendar on my 
> desk. Yesterday, it tells me, Jane Addams was born (1860), today the 
> Women protest Miss America Pageant took place (1968) and tomorrow the 
> Delano, CA, grape workers strike began (1965) which I vividly remember 
> as a consumer boycotting table grapes in my neighborhood Safeway in Los 
> Angeles (there is a writeup on the Delano grape strike in wikipedia
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delano_grape_strike
> So, thats my context, at least part of it.
> Having lived in Europe again since 1972 I am amazed about the 
> rediscovery of regional and local context... some of it age old but 
> attaining new attention and concrete shape such as currently in the 
> secession movement in Spain which the central government is trying to 
> stop with all means available.
>  From an ost point of view, looking at the preconditions for a favorable 
> climate for selforganisation to unfold, I think - among others - of 
> "diversity". Regularly, I observed that ost events that I was a part of 
> benefited in often amazing wayys when diversity was high. Of course, 
> folks planning such events were sensitive to this aspect.
> Different contexts being part of (any) event are very beneficial if not 
> necessary. That, and the other preconditions, make ost events not only 
> unique but successful. As far as I can tell, there is no substitute or 
> surrogate.
> Back to your books etc.: Whatever happens anywhere, it needs those 
> different contexts, such as the "11 different regional cultures" in the 
> USA or the 12 City Districts of Berlin, or the influx of migrants (a 
> centuries old characterictic of Berlin, for instance) --- without 
> differences the systems we create evaporate.
> Greetings from Berlin
> Hope you make it here some day
> cheers
> mmp
> PS: Please have a look at yourself here in the World Map
>> http://www.openspaceworldmap.org/worker/raffi-aftandelian
> You are hard to recognize! With the selforganized Content Management 
> System you can have a new picture in the Map, in a jiffy.
> Am 07.09.2017 um 15:22 schrieb Raffi Aftandelian via OSList:
>> Hi Lucas, hi all!
>> I´ve been following this conversation with interest and my curiousity 
>> is taking me in a different direction, hence a changed subject line- 
>> ¨On context.¨
>> First off, hats off to you, Lucas, for initiating these conversations. 
>> Much needed!
>> One question that comes up for me when these types of public 
>> conversations are offered is if the matter of context needs to be 
>> visited, and if so how is best to do so.
>>   I think there can be many, many assumptions- uncovered assumptions- 
>> that may end up not being aired. Assumptions like- ¨this is a 
>> democracy, we lost our way, and we need to find our way back.¨ Or, 
>> that Rodney King line, ¨Can´t we all get along?¨
>> On this question of context- as to who are we (here in the USA) and 
>> where are we, there are two points I´d want to make.
>> The first one-- by way of a story-- Back in my college days, I took a 
>> course in Soviet history. Our main text was a book titled Utopia in 
>> Power by dissident historians Nekrich and Geller. All (or many?) of 
>> the darkest chapters of Soviet history were right there, in gory 
>> detail. I remember thinking at the time- oh, those poor Soviets, too 
>> bad they don´t know the truth of their own history. And in my time 
>> living in Russia, I had the sense that most people- even educated 
>> people- had little knowledge of this history.
>> Fast forward twenty-five years. My book club read a work titled 
>> American Nations (by Colin Woodard) late last year- and as the 
>> coincidental timing would have it- we discussed the book the day after 
>> the election. Woodard identifies 11 different regional cultures in the 
>> USA, each with its own distinctive values, often clashing with those 
>> of other regional cultures. While I was reading the book, I realized 
>> how little I knew of ¨my¨ own country, how little I knew its history, 
>> how little I understood the cultural and value context of each of 
>> these regions, and gained a much clearer sense of why we these 
>> so-called culture wars and other kinds of social and political 
>> conflict. My takeaway was that it really didn´t make sense for all of 
>> these cultures to exist under one flag. I also realized that, no, we 
>> *can´t* get along (if couples can divorce, why can´t 
>> states/cities/communities divorce from the USA???)
>> So, the book had me flashing to that Soviet history class-- and in a 
>> way, I had my own comeuppance- ¨us poor Americans, if we only really 
>> knew our own context! I really wish that book - for all its own 
>> shortcomings- had a wider audience as it could really help us 
>> understand our own context much more clearly. And without a 
>> consideration of context, we are having these conversations without 
>> unpacking what *are* our respective worldviews anyway. And they are 
>> quite different.
>> The other aspect of context is surfacing assumptions about our current 
>> political system. As best as I can tell, the USA never was a 
>> democracy, nor even a republic. The best way I could describe it is as 
>> an inverted totalitarian apartheid state with a not insignificant 
>> amount of democratic window dressing.
>> Let me unpack this. Sheldon Wolin, a political philosopher at 
>> Princeton, who passed a few years ago, coined the term ¨inverted 
>> totalitarianism¨ to describe the political system we have here-- a web 
>> of corporations and other entities together exerting total control on 
>> the political system without the need for a person at the top (no need 
>> for a Stalin or Hitler). Journalist Chris Hedges breaks this concept 
>> down in an engaging three hour interview he gave to C-Span (it´s 
>> online) in 2012.
>> And, historian Gerald Horne in his recent Counter-revolution of 1776 
>> makes a strong argument that the so-called Revolution of 1776 was 
>> really a counter-revolution, a reactionary attempt to maintain the 
>> institution of slavery. He states that really the US was the first 
>> apartheid state.
>> And others would say that slavery never really ended, it just 
>> evolved...(I first heard of the institution of neo-slavery that 
>> existed from the end of the Civil War until the end of World War II 
>> and still don´t know much about it) So, when people say, ¨That´s not 
>> who we are (we aren´t racist, sexist, etc.)¨-- I find that maddening. 
>> We are all those things!
>> So, to be an inverted totalitarian apartheid state with a not 
>> insignificant amount of democratic window dressing isn´t bad. But, it 
>> would be too bad, I think, not to recognize that this is our base 
>> point. And what´s important is that there is some democratic window 
>> dressing-- there is some space to change things, some space for 
>> conversation, but perhaps not in the ways we would like to think.
>> So, I don´t know how or if what I´m bringing up here is useful. But, I 
>> do believe it needs to be part of these conversations somehow.
>> My two kopecks/rials/dinars/pesos,
>> raffi
>> **************
>> What blocks gratitude in this moment?
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSList mailing list
>> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>> Past archives can be viewed here: 
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org

Michael M Pannwitz
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
++49 - 30-772 8000
mmpannwitz at gmail.com

Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 443 resident Open 
Space Workers in 69 countries working in a total of 144 countries worldwide

Here you find books and task cards on open space, most in German, some 
in English, some as ebooks, some multilingual

More information about the OSList mailing list