[OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness
Daniel Mezick via OSList
oslist at lists.openspacetech.org
Wed Oct 7 16:53:01 PDT 2015
mmp,
Thanks for posting this under [The Tyranny of Structurelessness.]
How interesting that subscribers feel more comfortable contacting you
personally by email, rather than responding here.
Apparently you are more approachable for interactions and/or easier to
interact with than OSLIST. I'm sure there is more than one specific
reason "why" this might be true.
Daniel
On 10/7/15 5:16 PM, Michael M Pannwitz via OSList wrote:
> One of the structures, customs, ways of doing stuff, call it what you
> prefer I have repeatedly noticed: A number of Members of the LIST I
> never see on the LIST send responses to stuff I put on the LIST. When
> I think a message would be great for the whole LIST to see, I suggest
> it to the sender. Them Lurkers are definitely a "call it what you
> prefer" element of our organisation.
>
> Cheers from Berlin
> mmp
>
>
>
> On 07.10.2015 22:48, Michael Herman via OSList wrote:
>> wasn't actually intended as personal feedback, daniel. was meant to be
>> a comment on the territory we all share, even when we might, any of us,
>> feel in the moment like an outsider, that disorientation is actually a
>> part of being included in the experience of open space.
>>
>> as for the essay, i guess i'm still a little unclear about the
>> connection. open space doesn't strike me as any sort of striving for
>> structurelessness. and i've seen both formal and informal structure
>> arise in open space. harrison's term in his "millennial organization"
>> book and what i've seen happen is "appropriate levels of structure and
>> control."
>>
>> the oslist doesn't seem structureless, either. there are all kinds of
>> limiting and supporting structures that make it possible. and then
>> there are the customs we've developed, like it's common and desired for
>> people to reply to the whole list with answers to questions, and even
>> personal stories and sidebars, rather than always taking that stuff to
>> private emails. much of the informal stuff was captured in chris
>> corrigan's oslist faq's i mentioned earlier. and these things change.
>> the address changed. the admin changed. the archives moved but
>> survived, thanks to harold. now we allow attachments. the archives
>> were private and later became publicly searchable. new people show up
>> all the time, and join in. the user's non-guide (ebook) captured one
>> great moment in joining when julie smith showed up very new to all of
>> this, asked some great questions, and sparked all kinds of conversation
>> on many important dimensions of the practice.
>>
>> maybe your definition of structure will also define structureless. i
>> guess i don't know what ever could be structureless, in line wiht chris'
>> story... except that everything's moving, it's all flow, as harrison
>> says. but maybe those two stories aren't at odds, either... some bits
>> are just more dense or more slowly flowing than others, but it's all
>> flow in the end. is flow structureless?
>>
>> is the tyranny of structurelessness just to say that everything's
>> moving, and moving on, even the parts we really like, and that can make
>> for some difficult experiences... that would also be nobody's fault, but
>> just part of the shared condition? uncomfortable in spots, to be sure,
>> but nobody's and no system's "fault" or "responsibility?"
>>
>> as mentioned earlier, OS and the circle don't make people equal. some
>> will always be better, faster, stronger, more attractive, more connected
>> than others. is thta a problem to be solved? i'm having some trouble
>> connecting "elites," "movement," "authorization" and some other terms in
>> the essay to my experience in open space and on the list. the essay
>> seems to want to fix a problem, but one that's not familiar to me, at
>> least not as a sort of thing to be solved.
>>
>> why is this essay important for you? how does it inform your
>> understanding and practice of open space? or your participation on the
>> oslist? are we a movement? are you an elite? is open space at risk of
>> being taken over? help me make the connection(s)?
>>
>> i notice that you said in your first message that you find this
>> "extremely interesting" but you've yet to say why.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Michael Herman
>> Michael Herman Associates
>> http://MichaelHerman.com
>> http://OpenSpaceWorld.org
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Daniel Mezick <dan at newtechusa.net
>> <mailto:dan at newtechusa.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Yo Michael,
>>
>> The whole "story-context-is-missing" thing is really just a sidebar
>> to the important (and much wider) issues around authority.
>>
>> These authority-issues are raised by the subject essay, "The Tyranny
>> of Structurelessness." What a great essay!
>>
>> Story-context is a really, really important topic though, especially
>> if "missing-context" does have at least the potential to evoke
>> feelings of exclusion, in at least some members of the list.
>>
>> Regarding some of the things you are saying:
>>
>> You say, "Exclusion is the illusion. A little bit of errant and
>> temporary mental structure."
>>
>> I say, my current belief is that my feelings are not illusion
>> whatsoever, nor are they error. Rather they are real and valid,
>> human emotions. They are emotions which, when experienced fully, are
>> in fact an essential aspect of living well.
>>
>>
>> You say, "...I notice the word tyranny again in the subject. Is it
>> not some kind of tyranny we all attempt over and over again when we
>> expect and insist that the world explain itself to/for us?"
>>
>> I say, my current belief is that inquiry is not simply important, it
>> is in fact essential. Inquiry is good.
>>
>>
>>
>> In any event, and as always, I do appreciate your feedback.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am now keen to get back to the main topic !
>>
>> I wonder how we might, in the here and now, go about defining the
>> term "structure," for purposes of further discussing issues raised
>> by this essay with much more clarity.
>>
>> That's a question I'm keen to explore with you, and the other
>> members of this list, inside this thread.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Daniel
>> http://www.Prime-OS.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/6/15 11:56 AM, Michael Herman wrote:
>>> Yes and Daniel, there are the words of a story and the
>>> feeling/meaning of it. I considered writing a longer message in
>>> the telling of this story, but I wanted to transmit as much of the
>>> spirit/experience of it as I could.
>>>
>>> Ralph didn't offer any explanation of his observation that
>>> morning. He did just like I said, got up in a morning news circle,
>>> it was an OTgathering as I noted but that doesn't matter, it was
>>> open space and morning news. He said his piece and sat down. The
>>> experience for me, and others I have learned only later, was
>>> stunning and disorienting, for sure.
>>>
>>> I thought to honor and convey this experience through some measure
>>> of similar brevity in my retelling. Maybe this is what you picked
>>> up on. The disorienting magic of Ralph's moment.
>>>
>>> There are moments in open space of surprise and disconnect, maybe
>>> frustration or confusion or misunderstanding or disorientation and
>>> even disappointment that arise in open space. This we all know and
>>> have experienced. This, to me, is not so much a thing to be solved
>>> but the nature of the territory. It just is.
>>>
>>> Ralph never did explain his statement, as far as I know. He had
>>> something to say and he said it. That was his only job. After
>>> that, each of us had to figure out for ourselves what, if
>>> anything, to do with his story, to decide if it was wisdom or
>>> wisecrack. The storyteller, I think, has only the responsibility
>>> for finding and sharing what's true for him/her. The rest is up
>>> to us.
>>>
>>> Maybe this points to the learning and challenge that we all have
>>> in open space, namely learning to trust more and more that we
>>> already are always included in a flow that is bigger and deeper or
>>> whatever than we can see or understand or articulate sometimes.
>>> Exclusion is the illusion. A little bit of errant and temporary
>>> mental structure. Discomfort is not a problem (and can't be solved
>>> by anyone!); it's a trail marker. Which is to say about exclusion
>>> and missing out, "welcome!" The good news is, and the bad news
>>> is, you're in! And, it's all still happening Now.
>>>
>>> As I scroll up to send tha now, I notice the word tyranny again in
>>> the subject. Is it not some kind of tyranny we all attempt over
>>> and over again when we expect and insist that the world explain
>>> itself to/for us? Is this not something of our central challenge,
>>> something all of us work with? The edge of open space is an end
>>> of comfortable, conventional understanding? Or something?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, October 6, 2015, Daniel Mezick via OSList
>>> <<mailto:oslist at lists.openspacetech.org>oslist at lists.openspacetech.org
>>> <mailto:oslist at lists.openspacetech.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Harrison,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the tips on how to search OSLIST and Google, etc. I
>>> did do those things actually. However, that's a bit of an
>>> effort, especially searching the OSLIST archives. I guess I
>>> could eventually pick up OSLIST culture that way, little by
>>> little. I suppose an earnest person with loads of time could
>>> sift through OSLIST archives to figure this culture out. The
>>> hard way.
>>>
>>> However, like the SPIRIT book teaches, there is nothing like a
>>> good story to convey culture. The kind of story with a
>>> beginning, a middle and an end.
>>>
>>> I notice that, when you are the one referring to a certain
>>> OS-mythos story, you usually tend to include the short list of
>>> pertinent details, the essential details that provide the
>>> essential context, so the reader can follow along, and engage.
>>>
>>> And I'm always grateful for that, as it helps me to follow
>>> along, and get what you are referring to, and more fully
>>> understand the story, and feel oddly included in the story.
>>>
>>>
>>> Earlier, I express how not having the context tends to (for
>>> me) arouse feelings of: exclusion, cluelessness, and a general
>>> lack of membership in whatever "historic-OS-mythos-episode" is
>>> being referred to. Sort of an "out group" feeling. You know?
>>> Sometimes, I wonder what the poster might be thinking by
>>> posting random fragments of a "you had to be there" kind of
>>> story. Other times, I wonder if other readers are also feeling
>>> these feelings. Or if it is "just me."
>>>
>>> And so: I am very grateful for your stories, in part because
>>> you include the pertinent details, and in so doing, make me
>>> (for one) feel included.
>>>
>>> So thanks for including the context in your stories. It makes
>>> them fun, and easy to follow. OSLIST culture certainly has
>>> it's quirks, and for me, your stories make this culture easier
>>> to figure out, and navigate, and enjoy.
>>>
>>>
>>> Getting back to the Tyranny of Structurelessness:
>>>
>>> Do you think these 3 assertions by the author are actually
>>> true? Do these ideas have legs?
>>>
>>> * /This hegemony can be so easily established because the
>>> idea of "structurelessness" does not prevent the formation
>>> of informal structures, only formal ones./
>>> * /For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a
>>> given group and to participate in its activities, the
>>> structure must be explicit, not implicit. /
>>> * /It is this informal structure, particularly in
>>> Unstructured groups, which forms the basis for elites./
>>>
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On 10/6/15 10:04 AM, Harrison Owen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dan, Google can often help.
>>>> <https://www.google.com/#q=ralph+copleman>https://www.google.com/#q=ralph+copleman
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ho
>>>>
>>>> *From:*OSList [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org]
>>>> *On Behalf Of *Daniel Mezick via OSList
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, October 05, 2015 4:51 PM
>>>> *To:* Harrison Owen; World wide Open Space Technology email
>>>> list
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness
>>>>
>>>> Howdy Harrison,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for describing the context of the Ralph Copleman
>>>> story- I'm very thankful for that info.
>>>>
>>>> I notice that, lots of times here, there are references made
>>>> to notable OST episodes, and situations from times past...
>>>>
>>>> ...the "OST-mythos" as it were.
>>>>
>>>> These mythical stories often have me wondering what I missed,
>>>> and what I might now be missing. (Being clueless as I am.)
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure these story-fragment postings are not posted with
>>>> intent to exclude anyone, or to be discourteous, or unkind.
>>>> More like: some good old basic camaraderie is taking place
>>>> between some old friends.
>>>>
>>>> Still: Do these "inside-story-fragments" on OSLIST tend to
>>>> evoke feelings of exclusion in readers who were /not/ there
>>>> at the time?
>>>>
>>>> Not sure.
>>>>
>>>> <CONFESSION>
>>>>
>>>> As for me, personally, I sometimes find myself experiencing
>>>> curiously odd feelings of exclusion, when a told-fragment of
>>>> an old OST-mythos story lacks explicit context. So I can
>>>> follow the story, you know? The terms "outsider" or
>>>> "clueless" or "not in the story" describe these feelings
>>>> fairly well. "Not invited?"
>>>>
>>>> I sometimes wonder if some of the hundreds of /other/ members
>>>> of OSLIST ever feel this way...or if it is "just me."
>>>>
>>>> </CONFESSION>
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/4/15 2:59 PM, Harrison Owen via OSList wrote:
>>>>
>>>> “Everythingis moving.† .... Michael -- I remember
>>>> that moment verywell. And Dan, I’m not sure the
>>>> context, etc, would helpvery much. But just for the
>>>> record the odd phrase popped out at one of the
>>>> International Symposia on Organization Transformation
>>>> which happened to be taking place at a small college
>>>> south of Seattle. I have no idea why Ralph said what he
>>>> did, and I’m not sure Ralph did either. But then againa
>>>> lot of marvelous stuff seems to burst out with no obvious
>>>> logic train. Indeed it may be that the lack of logic
>>>> train enables the thought?
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Whatever the genesis, the phrase wandered about my head
>>>> for some time, quite unattached, and it also happened
>>>> that I was working my way slowly through one of the
>>>> masterpieces of 20^th century western philosophy when a
>>>> fuzzy connection began to form. The work was that of
>>>> Alfred North Whitehead, and the title: “Process and
>>>> Reality.†I’ve been through thebook probably 4-5
>>>> times, and I am frank to confess that I don’t think I
>>>> really understandit. But then again I’veheard a
>>>> number of people with much greater credentials, tenure,
>>>> etc – say the same thing. But I did get that ithad
>>>> something to do with, “Everything is moving.†Andthe
>>>> more I thought and read, the more I felt that the good
>>>> philosopher had made a small mistake on his title. It
>>>> shouldn’t be “Process/and/ Reality,†but
>>>> rather“Process*is* Reality.â€
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Now, Anna Caroline we come to “structure,†or perhaps
>>>> Ishould say the fallacy of Structure? Yes I know –
>>>> we’ve all been taught that structure is the precursor,
>>>> the “determinator†of everything. My face looks as it
>>>> doesbecause of my bone structure. My life proceeds the
>>>> way it does because of my social structure. My business
>>>> works as it does because of the organizational structure.
>>>> And of course, meetings happen the way they do because of
>>>> meeting structure, which apparently is the prime domain
>>>> of “facilitators.†And even if we hadn’t
>>>> been“taught†all this, the primacy of structure would
>>>> appearto be blatantly obvious – as plain as the nose on
>>>> yourface.
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, it does seem to turn out that sometimes
>>>> the blatantly obvious is not necessarily so. For example
>>>> just looking at things it is pretty clear that the world
>>>> is flat, or at the least bumpy flat. And any fool can see
>>>> that we are the center of it all – Sun, moon, and stars
>>>> whiz around us. But when we think about it, as we have
>>>> been doing for the last 500-600 years, the obvious
>>>> isn’t so obvious.
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> It is reasonable to ask what would start to make us think
>>>> differently – to the point that we begin to question
>>>> theobvious, and even come to see things in a different
>>>> way? Taking a leap, I will suggest that it all begins
>>>> with the perception of anomaly. Things just don’t make
>>>> sense. Our eyes tell us one thing... but???? And then we
>>>> start making up stories to explain the apparently
>>>> unexplainable. We imagine different ways of looking at
>>>> things so that the nonsensical makes sense. Some of those
>>>> stories get pretty strange, but if they actually work –
>>>> that is to say, helpus to see in new and useful ways –
>>>> that’s great!
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> There is, of course, a proper term for the activity I
>>>> have been describing. It is called Theory Building. And
>>>> for whatever it is worth, “theory†comes from the
>>>> Greek “/theoreinâ//€ /– to see. In a word, theories
>>>> are ways of looking atthings – likely stories you might
>>>> say.
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Now, at long last (too long?) we come to the odd story I
>>>> was starting to tell, to the effect that Structure is
>>>> only a figment of our imagination, a flash frame of a
>>>> moment gone by. Interesting, and helpful under some
>>>> circumstances... but always partial and in a sense
>>>> illusory. What’s“really†happening is all flow.
>>>> Everything is moving –That’s Ralph’s story, and I
>>>> guess it is mine too.
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> So how did I get to such a weird condition? It was all
>>>> about anomaly – more particularly, the anomaly of Open
>>>> Space.Everything that I had ever learned told me that it
>>>> could not work. Unfortunately it did (work) – and not
>>>> just once, butevery time, hundreds of thousands of times.
>>>> Something was definitely weird. It seemed to me that I
>>>> had to re-consider all those things I thought I had
>>>> learned, beginning with the basics... such things as
>>>> Structure.
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Common sense would say that Open Space works because we
>>>> somehow created a structure that enabled it to work.
>>>> That’s theway things get done, or so I had been taught.
>>>> But that’snot the way things happened in Open Space.
>>>> Structure emerged along the way and only momentarily.
>>>> Worse yet it (structure) seemed to have little to do with
>>>> the obvious power, connections, creativity.... all of
>>>> which created structures, and passed them by. And
>>>> actually it always seemed to me that the “structuresâ€
>>>> I “saw†existed only because Iwanted to see them –
>>>> or perhaps that I “should†seethem. But they were only
>>>> momentary wisps, figments – neverto be mistaken for
>>>> what was really going on. Or so I’vebeen thinking.
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Harrison
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> *From:*OSList
>>>> [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org] *On
>>>> Behalf Of *Michael Herman via OSList
>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 03, 2015 6:31 PM
>>>> *To:* JL Walker; World wide Open Space Technology email
>>>> list
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> you remind me, harrison, of one morning news session
>>>> years ago, somewhere, probably OT... where ralph copleman
>>>> walked to the center of the circle and announced, all
>>>> serious and mischievous at the same time, "it's all
>>>> moving!" Â
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> then put the stick down and went back to his seat.Â
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Michael Herman
>>>> Michael Herman Associates
>>>> http://MichaelHerman.com
>>>> http://OpenSpaceWorld.org
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:47 PM, JL Walker via OSList
>>>> <oslist at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>> <mailto:oslist at lists.openspacetech.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking that maybe the antidote to the eventual
>>>> tyranny of structurelessness is to open space, again and
>>>> again, until true democracy can emerge.
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Juan Luis
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> *De:*OSList
>>>> [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>> <mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org>] *En
>>>> nombre de *Rosa Zubizarreta via OSList
>>>> *Enviado el:* sábado, 03 de octubre de 2015 12:19
>>>> *Para:* Daniel Mezick; World wide Open Space Technology
>>>> email list
>>>> *Asunto:* Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, this is a key piece... I see it as very similar in
>>>> some ways to what Ken Wilber wrote later,
>>>>
>>>> about the "shadow side of the green meme". (Each meme has
>>>> its own shadow, as well as its own gift...)
>>>>
>>>> So, I love "green". I love circles, I love non-hierarchy,
>>>> etc.
>>>> And, part of the "shadow side of the green meme" is how
>>>> ideologically anti-structure it can become...
>>>>
>>>> to the point where some people may not even agree that
>>>> OST does, in fact, offer a very simple and effective
>>>> structure.
>>>>
>>>> By way contrast, think of a situation where group of
>>>> people (who don't know about OST, and/or, who are having
>>>> a power struggle around "which process to use",
>>>> and/or.... ) might easily spending a whole weekend
>>>> arguing /about /"how to self-organize ourselves"... with
>>>> a great deal more pain and frustration and a great deal
>>>> less value.
>>>>
>>>> whereas, instead, IF someone knows about OST, and, a
>>>> clear invitation has been extended, and, there is enough
>>>> trust/suspension of disbelief so that participants are
>>>> willing to enter into that format,
>>>>
>>>> then, we end up with a very simple and elegant structure
>>>> that allows people to self-organize beautifully....
>>>>
>>>> at least that's how i see it! :-)
>>>>
>>>> with all best wishes,
>>>>
>>>> Rosa
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> */Rosa Zubizarreta/*
>>>>
>>>> /Developing Participatory and Co-intelligent Leadership
>>>> Author of *From Conflict to Creative Collaboration*
>>>> <http://www.conflict2creativity.com>/
>>>>
>>>> /For more resources and learning opportunities, visit
>>>> *<http://www.DiaPraxis.com>www.DiaPraxis.com
>>>> <http://www.DiaPraxis.com>*/
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Daniel Mezick via OSList
>>>> <oslist at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>> <mailto:oslist at lists.openspacetech.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS
>>>> by Jo Freeman aka Joreen
>>>>
>>>> I find this essay extremely interesting. I hope you do,
>>>> too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here is a pertinent quote, from the essay:
>>>> ".../the idea of "structurelessness" does not prevent the
>>>> formation of informal structures, only formal ones."
>>>>
>>>> /
>>>> Circa 1970. Context: the women's movement. Quick summary
>>>> of the main points: from the essay...
>>>>
>>>> ï‚·/During the years in which the women's liberation
>>>> movement has been taking shape, a great emphasis has been
>>>> placed on what are called leaderless, structureless
>>>> groups as the main -- if not sole -- organizational form
>>>> of the movement. /
>>>>
>>>> ï‚·/The idea of "structurelessness," however, has moved
>>>> from a healthy counter to those tendencies, to becoming a
>>>> goddess in its own right./
>>>>
>>>> ï‚·/Contrary to what we would like to believe, there is
>>>> no such thing as a structureless group. /
>>>>
>>>> ï‚·/This means that to strive for a structureless group
>>>> is as useful, and as deceptive, as to aim at an
>>>> "objective" news story, "value-free" social science, or a
>>>> "free" economy. A "laissez faire" group is about as
>>>> realistic as a "laissez faire" society; the idea becomes
>>>> a smokescreen for the strong or the lucky to establish
>>>> unquestioned hegemony over others. /
>>>>
>>>> ï‚·/This hegemony can be so easily established because
>>>> the idea of "structurelessness" does not prevent the
>>>> formation of informal structures, only formal ones. /
>>>>
>>>> ï‚·/For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved
>>>> in a given group and to participate in its activities,
>>>> the structure must be explicit, not implicit. /
>>>>
>>>> ï‚·/It is this informal structure, particularly in
>>>> Unstructured groups, which forms the basis for elites./
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just in case you have not yet encountered the full text
>>>> of this essay, here it is:
>>>>
>>>> THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS
>>>> by Jo Freeman aka Joreen
>>>> http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Daniel
>>>> http://www.OpenSpaceAgility.com/about
>>>> http://www.DanielMezick.com
>>>> 203 915 7248 <tel:203%20915%207248>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OSList mailing list
>>>> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>> <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org>
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>> <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org>
>>>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>>>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>>> Past archives can be viewed here:
>>>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OSList mailing list
>>>> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>> <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org>
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>> <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org>
>>>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>>>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>>> Past archives can be viewed here:
>>>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
>>>>
>>>> Â
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> OSList mailing list
>>>>
>>>> To post send emails toOSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email
>>>> toOSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>>
>>>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>>>
>>>> Past archives can be viewed
>>>> here:http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Daniel Mezick, President
>>>>
>>>> New Technology Solutions Inc.
>>>>
>>>> (203) 915 7248 <tel:%28203%29%20915%207248> (cell)
>>>>
>>>> Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
>>>> <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
>>>> <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.Â
>>>>
>>>> Examine my new book:Â The Culture Game
>>>> <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools
>>>> for the Agile Manager.
>>>>
>>>> Explore Agile Team Training
>>>> <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and
>>>> Coaching.
>>>> <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
>>>>
>>>> Explore the Agile Boston
>>>> <http://newtechusa.net/user-groups/ma/>Community.Â
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Daniel Mezick, President
>>>
>>> New Technology Solutions Inc.
>>>
>>> (203) 915 7248 <tel:%28203%29%20915%207248> (cell)
>>>
>>> Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
>>> <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
>>> <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
>>>
>>> Examine my new book:The Culture Game
>>> <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools
>>> for the Agile Manager.
>>>
>>> Explore Agile Team Training
>>> <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and
>>> Coaching.
>>> <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
>>>
>>> Explore the Agile Boston
>>> <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Michael Herman
>>> Michael Herman Associates
>>> http://MichaelHerman.com
>>> http://OpenSpaceWorld.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Daniel Mezick, President
>>
>> New Technology Solutions Inc.
>>
>> (203) 915 7248 <tel:%28203%29%20915%207248> (cell)
>>
>> Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
>> <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
>>
>> Examine my new book:The Culture Game
>> <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the
>> Agile Manager.
>>
>> Explore Agile Team Training
>> <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching.
>> <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
>>
>> Explore the Agile Boston
>> <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSList mailing list
>> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>> Past archives can be viewed here:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
>>
>
--
Daniel Mezick, President
New Technology Solutions Inc.
(203) 915 7248 (cell)
Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
<http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
Examine my new book:The Culture Game
<http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the
Agile Manager.
Explore Agile Team Training
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching.
<http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
Explore the Agile Boston <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20151007/1ae0def4/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the OSList
mailing list