[OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness
Michael M Pannwitz via OSList
oslist at lists.openspacetech.org
Wed Oct 7 14:16:06 PDT 2015
One of the structures, customs, ways of doing stuff, call it what you
prefer I have repeatedly noticed: A number of Members of the LIST I
never see on the LIST send responses to stuff I put on the LIST. When I
think a message would be great for the whole LIST to see, I suggest it
to the sender. Them Lurkers are definitely a "call it what you prefer"
element of our organisation.
Cheers from Berlin
mmp
On 07.10.2015 22:48, Michael Herman via OSList wrote:
> wasn't actually intended as personal feedback, daniel. was meant to be
> a comment on the territory we all share, even when we might, any of us,
> feel in the moment like an outsider, that disorientation is actually a
> part of being included in the experience of open space.
>
> as for the essay, i guess i'm still a little unclear about the
> connection. open space doesn't strike me as any sort of striving for
> structurelessness. and i've seen both formal and informal structure
> arise in open space. harrison's term in his "millennial organization"
> book and what i've seen happen is "appropriate levels of structure and
> control."
>
> the oslist doesn't seem structureless, either. there are all kinds of
> limiting and supporting structures that make it possible. and then
> there are the customs we've developed, like it's common and desired for
> people to reply to the whole list with answers to questions, and even
> personal stories and sidebars, rather than always taking that stuff to
> private emails. much of the informal stuff was captured in chris
> corrigan's oslist faq's i mentioned earlier. and these things change.
> the address changed. the admin changed. the archives moved but
> survived, thanks to harold. now we allow attachments. the archives
> were private and later became publicly searchable. new people show up
> all the time, and join in. the user's non-guide (ebook) captured one
> great moment in joining when julie smith showed up very new to all of
> this, asked some great questions, and sparked all kinds of conversation
> on many important dimensions of the practice.
>
> maybe your definition of structure will also define structureless. i
> guess i don't know what ever could be structureless, in line wiht chris'
> story... except that everything's moving, it's all flow, as harrison
> says. but maybe those two stories aren't at odds, either... some bits
> are just more dense or more slowly flowing than others, but it's all
> flow in the end. is flow structureless?
>
> is the tyranny of structurelessness just to say that everything's
> moving, and moving on, even the parts we really like, and that can make
> for some difficult experiences... that would also be nobody's fault, but
> just part of the shared condition? uncomfortable in spots, to be sure,
> but nobody's and no system's "fault" or "responsibility?"
>
> as mentioned earlier, OS and the circle don't make people equal. some
> will always be better, faster, stronger, more attractive, more connected
> than others. is thta a problem to be solved? i'm having some trouble
> connecting "elites," "movement," "authorization" and some other terms in
> the essay to my experience in open space and on the list. the essay
> seems to want to fix a problem, but one that's not familiar to me, at
> least not as a sort of thing to be solved.
>
> why is this essay important for you? how does it inform your
> understanding and practice of open space? or your participation on the
> oslist? are we a movement? are you an elite? is open space at risk of
> being taken over? help me make the connection(s)?
>
> i notice that you said in your first message that you find this
> "extremely interesting" but you've yet to say why.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Michael Herman
> Michael Herman Associates
> http://MichaelHerman.com
> http://OpenSpaceWorld.org
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Daniel Mezick <dan at newtechusa.net
> <mailto:dan at newtechusa.net>> wrote:
>
> Yo Michael,
>
> The whole "story-context-is-missing" thing is really just a sidebar
> to the important (and much wider) issues around authority.
>
> These authority-issues are raised by the subject essay, "The Tyranny
> of Structurelessness." What a great essay!
>
> Story-context is a really, really important topic though, especially
> if "missing-context" does have at least the potential to evoke
> feelings of exclusion, in at least some members of the list.
>
> Regarding some of the things you are saying:
>
> You say, "Exclusion is the illusion. A little bit of errant and
> temporary mental structure."
>
> I say, my current belief is that my feelings are not illusion
> whatsoever, nor are they error. Rather they are real and valid,
> human emotions. They are emotions which, when experienced fully, are
> in fact an essential aspect of living well.
>
>
> You say, "...I notice the word tyranny again in the subject. Is it
> not some kind of tyranny we all attempt over and over again when we
> expect and insist that the world explain itself to/for us?"
>
> I say, my current belief is that inquiry is not simply important, it
> is in fact essential. Inquiry is good.
>
>
>
> In any event, and as always, I do appreciate your feedback.
>
>
>
> I am now keen to get back to the main topic !
>
> I wonder how we might, in the here and now, go about defining the
> term "structure," for purposes of further discussing issues raised
> by this essay with much more clarity.
>
> That's a question I'm keen to explore with you, and the other
> members of this list, inside this thread.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
> http://www.Prime-OS.com
>
>
>
>
> On 10/6/15 11:56 AM, Michael Herman wrote:
>> Yes and Daniel, there are the words of a story and the
>> feeling/meaning of it. I considered writing a longer message in
>> the telling of this story, but I wanted to transmit as much of the
>> spirit/experience of it as I could.
>>
>> Ralph didn't offer any explanation of his observation that
>> morning. He did just like I said, got up in a morning news circle,
>> it was an OTgathering as I noted but that doesn't matter, it was
>> open space and morning news. He said his piece and sat down. The
>> experience for me, and others I have learned only later, was
>> stunning and disorienting, for sure.
>>
>> I thought to honor and convey this experience through some measure
>> of similar brevity in my retelling. Maybe this is what you picked
>> up on. The disorienting magic of Ralph's moment.
>>
>> There are moments in open space of surprise and disconnect, maybe
>> frustration or confusion or misunderstanding or disorientation and
>> even disappointment that arise in open space. This we all know and
>> have experienced. This, to me, is not so much a thing to be solved
>> but the nature of the territory. It just is.
>>
>> Ralph never did explain his statement, as far as I know. He had
>> something to say and he said it. That was his only job. After
>> that, each of us had to figure out for ourselves what, if
>> anything, to do with his story, to decide if it was wisdom or
>> wisecrack. The storyteller, I think, has only the responsibility
>> for finding and sharing what's true for him/her. The rest is up
>> to us.
>>
>> Maybe this points to the learning and challenge that we all have
>> in open space, namely learning to trust more and more that we
>> already are always included in a flow that is bigger and deeper or
>> whatever than we can see or understand or articulate sometimes.
>> Exclusion is the illusion. A little bit of errant and temporary
>> mental structure. Discomfort is not a problem (and can't be solved
>> by anyone!); it's a trail marker. Which is to say about exclusion
>> and missing out, "welcome!" The good news is, and the bad news
>> is, you're in! And, it's all still happening Now.
>>
>> As I scroll up to send tha now, I notice the word tyranny again in
>> the subject. Is it not some kind of tyranny we all attempt over
>> and over again when we expect and insist that the world explain
>> itself to/for us? Is this not something of our central challenge,
>> something all of us work with? The edge of open space is an end
>> of comfortable, conventional understanding? Or something?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 6, 2015, Daniel Mezick via OSList
>> <<mailto:oslist at lists.openspacetech.org>oslist at lists.openspacetech.org
>> <mailto:oslist at lists.openspacetech.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Harrison,
>>
>> Thanks for the tips on how to search OSLIST and Google, etc. I
>> did do those things actually. However, that's a bit of an
>> effort, especially searching the OSLIST archives. I guess I
>> could eventually pick up OSLIST culture that way, little by
>> little. I suppose an earnest person with loads of time could
>> sift through OSLIST archives to figure this culture out. The
>> hard way.
>>
>> However, like the SPIRIT book teaches, there is nothing like a
>> good story to convey culture. The kind of story with a
>> beginning, a middle and an end.
>>
>> I notice that, when you are the one referring to a certain
>> OS-mythos story, you usually tend to include the short list of
>> pertinent details, the essential details that provide the
>> essential context, so the reader can follow along, and engage.
>>
>> And I'm always grateful for that, as it helps me to follow
>> along, and get what you are referring to, and more fully
>> understand the story, and feel oddly included in the story.
>>
>>
>> Earlier, I express how not having the context tends to (for
>> me) arouse feelings of: exclusion, cluelessness, and a general
>> lack of membership in whatever "historic-OS-mythos-episode" is
>> being referred to. Sort of an "out group" feeling. You know?
>> Sometimes, I wonder what the poster might be thinking by
>> posting random fragments of a "you had to be there" kind of
>> story. Other times, I wonder if other readers are also feeling
>> these feelings. Or if it is "just me."
>>
>> And so: I am very grateful for your stories, in part because
>> you include the pertinent details, and in so doing, make me
>> (for one) feel included.
>>
>> So thanks for including the context in your stories. It makes
>> them fun, and easy to follow. OSLIST culture certainly has
>> it's quirks, and for me, your stories make this culture easier
>> to figure out, and navigate, and enjoy.
>>
>>
>> Getting back to the Tyranny of Structurelessness:
>>
>> Do you think these 3 assertions by the author are actually
>> true? Do these ideas have legs?
>>
>> * /This hegemony can be so easily established because the
>> idea of "structurelessness" does not prevent the formation
>> of informal structures, only formal ones./
>> * /For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved in a
>> given group and to participate in its activities, the
>> structure must be explicit, not implicit. /
>> * /It is this informal structure, particularly in
>> Unstructured groups, which forms the basis for elites./
>>
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 10/6/15 10:04 AM, Harrison Owen wrote:
>>>
>>> Dan, Google can often help.
>>> <https://www.google.com/#q=ralph+copleman>https://www.google.com/#q=ralph+copleman
>>>
>>>
>>> ho
>>>
>>> *From:*OSList [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org]
>>> *On Behalf Of *Daniel Mezick via OSList
>>> *Sent:* Monday, October 05, 2015 4:51 PM
>>> *To:* Harrison Owen; World wide Open Space Technology email list
>>> *Subject:* Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness
>>>
>>> Howdy Harrison,
>>>
>>> Thanks for describing the context of the Ralph Copleman
>>> story- I'm very thankful for that info.
>>>
>>> I notice that, lots of times here, there are references made
>>> to notable OST episodes, and situations from times past...
>>>
>>> ...the "OST-mythos" as it were.
>>>
>>> These mythical stories often have me wondering what I missed,
>>> and what I might now be missing. (Being clueless as I am.)
>>>
>>> I'm sure these story-fragment postings are not posted with
>>> intent to exclude anyone, or to be discourteous, or unkind.
>>> More like: some good old basic camaraderie is taking place
>>> between some old friends.
>>>
>>> Still: Do these "inside-story-fragments" on OSLIST tend to
>>> evoke feelings of exclusion in readers who were /not/ there
>>> at the time?
>>>
>>> Not sure.
>>>
>>> <CONFESSION>
>>>
>>> As for me, personally, I sometimes find myself experiencing
>>> curiously odd feelings of exclusion, when a told-fragment of
>>> an old OST-mythos story lacks explicit context. So I can
>>> follow the story, you know? The terms "outsider" or
>>> "clueless" or "not in the story" describe these feelings
>>> fairly well. "Not invited?"
>>>
>>> I sometimes wonder if some of the hundreds of /other/ members
>>> of OSLIST ever feel this way...or if it is "just me."
>>>
>>> </CONFESSION>
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/4/15 2:59 PM, Harrison Owen via OSList wrote:
>>>
>>> “Everythingis moving.† .... Michael -- I remember
>>> that moment verywell. And Dan, I’m not sure the
>>> context, etc, would helpvery much. But just for the
>>> record the odd phrase popped out at one of the
>>> International Symposia on Organization Transformation
>>> which happened to be taking place at a small college
>>> south of Seattle. I have no idea why Ralph said what he
>>> did, and I’m not sure Ralph did either. But then againa
>>> lot of marvelous stuff seems to burst out with no obvious
>>> logic train. Indeed it may be that the lack of logic
>>> train enables the thought?
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Whatever the genesis, the phrase wandered about my head
>>> for some time, quite unattached, and it also happened
>>> that I was working my way slowly through one of the
>>> masterpieces of 20^th century western philosophy when a
>>> fuzzy connection began to form. The work was that of
>>> Alfred North Whitehead, and the title: “Process and
>>> Reality.†I’ve been through thebook probably 4-5
>>> times, and I am frank to confess that I don’t think I
>>> really understandit. But then again I’veheard a
>>> number of people with much greater credentials, tenure,
>>> etc – say the same thing. But I did get that ithad
>>> something to do with, “Everything is moving.†Andthe
>>> more I thought and read, the more I felt that the good
>>> philosopher had made a small mistake on his title. It
>>> shouldn’t be “Process/and/ Reality,†but
>>> rather“Process*is* Reality.â€
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Now, Anna Caroline we come to “structure,†or perhaps
>>> Ishould say the fallacy of Structure? Yes I know –
>>> we’ve all been taught that structure is the precursor,
>>> the “determinator†of everything. My face looks as it
>>> doesbecause of my bone structure. My life proceeds the
>>> way it does because of my social structure. My business
>>> works as it does because of the organizational structure.
>>> And of course, meetings happen the way they do because of
>>> meeting structure, which apparently is the prime domain
>>> of “facilitators.†And even if we hadn’t
>>> been“taught†all this, the primacy of structure would
>>> appearto be blatantly obvious – as plain as the nose on
>>> yourface.
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, it does seem to turn out that sometimes
>>> the blatantly obvious is not necessarily so. For example
>>> just looking at things it is pretty clear that the world
>>> is flat, or at the least bumpy flat. And any fool can see
>>> that we are the center of it all – Sun, moon, and stars
>>> whiz around us. But when we think about it, as we have
>>> been doing for the last 500-600 years, the obvious
>>> isn’t so obvious.
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> It is reasonable to ask what would start to make us think
>>> differently – to the point that we begin to question
>>> theobvious, and even come to see things in a different
>>> way? Taking a leap, I will suggest that it all begins
>>> with the perception of anomaly. Things just don’t make
>>> sense. Our eyes tell us one thing... but???? And then we
>>> start making up stories to explain the apparently
>>> unexplainable. We imagine different ways of looking at
>>> things so that the nonsensical makes sense. Some of those
>>> stories get pretty strange, but if they actually work –
>>> that is to say, helpus to see in new and useful ways –
>>> that’s great!
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> There is, of course, a proper term for the activity I
>>> have been describing. It is called Theory Building. And
>>> for whatever it is worth, “theory†comes from the
>>> Greek “/theoreinâ//€ /– to see. In a word, theories
>>> are ways of looking atthings – likely stories you might
>>> say.
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Now, at long last (too long?) we come to the odd story I
>>> was starting to tell, to the effect that Structure is
>>> only a figment of our imagination, a flash frame of a
>>> moment gone by. Interesting, and helpful under some
>>> circumstances... but always partial and in a sense
>>> illusory. What’s“really†happening is all flow.
>>> Everything is moving –That’s Ralph’s story, and I
>>> guess it is mine too.
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> So how did I get to such a weird condition? It was all
>>> about anomaly – more particularly, the anomaly of Open
>>> Space.Everything that I had ever learned told me that it
>>> could not work. Unfortunately it did (work) – and not
>>> just once, butevery time, hundreds of thousands of times.
>>> Something was definitely weird. It seemed to me that I
>>> had to re-consider all those things I thought I had
>>> learned, beginning with the basics... such things as
>>> Structure.
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Common sense would say that Open Space works because we
>>> somehow created a structure that enabled it to work.
>>> That’s theway things get done, or so I had been taught.
>>> But that’snot the way things happened in Open Space.
>>> Structure emerged along the way and only momentarily.
>>> Worse yet it (structure) seemed to have little to do with
>>> the obvious power, connections, creativity.... all of
>>> which created structures, and passed them by. And
>>> actually it always seemed to me that the “structuresâ€
>>> I “saw†existed only because Iwanted to see them –
>>> or perhaps that I “should†seethem. But they were only
>>> momentary wisps, figments – neverto be mistaken for
>>> what was really going on. Or so I’vebeen thinking.
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Harrison
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> *From:*OSList
>>> [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Michael Herman via OSList
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 03, 2015 6:31 PM
>>> *To:* JL Walker; World wide Open Space Technology email list
>>> *Subject:* Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> you remind me, harrison, of one morning news session
>>> years ago, somewhere, probably OT... where ralph copleman
>>> walked to the center of the circle and announced, all
>>> serious and mischievous at the same time, "it's all
>>> moving!" Â
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> then put the stick down and went back to his seat.Â
>>>
>>>
>>> Â
>>> --
>>>
>>> Michael Herman
>>> Michael Herman Associates
>>> http://MichaelHerman.com
>>> http://OpenSpaceWorld.org
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:47 PM, JL Walker via OSList
>>> <oslist at lists.openspacetech.org
>>> <mailto:oslist at lists.openspacetech.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was thinking that maybe the antidote to the eventual
>>> tyranny of structurelessness is to open space, again and
>>> again, until true democracy can emerge.
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Juan Luis
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> *De:*OSList
>>> [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org
>>> <mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org>] *En
>>> nombre de *Rosa Zubizarreta via OSList
>>> *Enviado el:* sábado, 03 de octubre de 2015 12:19
>>> *Para:* Daniel Mezick; World wide Open Space Technology
>>> email list
>>> *Asunto:* Re: [OSList] The Tyranny of Structurelessness
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> Yes, this is a key piece... I see it as very similar in
>>> some ways to what Ken Wilber wrote later,
>>>
>>> about the "shadow side of the green meme". (Each meme has
>>> its own shadow, as well as its own gift...)
>>>
>>> So, I love "green". I love circles, I love non-hierarchy,
>>> etc.
>>> And, part of the "shadow side of the green meme" is how
>>> ideologically anti-structure it can become...
>>>
>>> to the point where some people may not even agree that
>>> OST does, in fact, offer a very simple and effective
>>> structure.
>>>
>>> By way contrast, think of a situation where group of
>>> people (who don't know about OST, and/or, who are having
>>> a power struggle around "which process to use",
>>> and/or.... ) might easily spending a whole weekend
>>> arguing /about /"how to self-organize ourselves"... with
>>> a great deal more pain and frustration and a great deal
>>> less value.
>>>
>>> whereas, instead, IF someone knows about OST, and, a
>>> clear invitation has been extended, and, there is enough
>>> trust/suspension of disbelief so that participants are
>>> willing to enter into that format,
>>>
>>> then, we end up with a very simple and elegant structure
>>> that allows people to self-organize beautifully....
>>>
>>> at least that's how i see it! :-)
>>>
>>> with all best wishes,
>>>
>>> Rosa
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>>
>>> */Rosa Zubizarreta/*
>>>
>>> /Developing Participatory and Co-intelligent Leadership
>>> Author of *From Conflict to Creative Collaboration*
>>> <http://www.conflict2creativity.com>/
>>>
>>> /For more resources and learning opportunities, visit
>>> *<http://www.DiaPraxis.com>www.DiaPraxis.com
>>> <http://www.DiaPraxis.com>*/
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Daniel Mezick via OSList
>>> <oslist at lists.openspacetech.org
>>> <mailto:oslist at lists.openspacetech.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS
>>> by Jo Freeman aka Joreen
>>>
>>> I find this essay extremely interesting. I hope you do, too.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is a pertinent quote, from the essay:
>>> ".../the idea of "structurelessness" does not prevent the
>>> formation of informal structures, only formal ones."
>>>
>>> /
>>> Circa 1970. Context: the women's movement. Quick summary
>>> of the main points: from the essay...
>>>
>>> ï‚·/During the years in which the women's liberation
>>> movement has been taking shape, a great emphasis has been
>>> placed on what are called leaderless, structureless
>>> groups as the main -- if not sole -- organizational form
>>> of the movement. /
>>>
>>> ï‚·/The idea of "structurelessness," however, has moved
>>> from a healthy counter to those tendencies, to becoming a
>>> goddess in its own right./
>>>
>>> ï‚·/Contrary to what we would like to believe, there is
>>> no such thing as a structureless group. /
>>>
>>> ï‚·/This means that to strive for a structureless group
>>> is as useful, and as deceptive, as to aim at an
>>> "objective" news story, "value-free" social science, or a
>>> "free" economy. A "laissez faire" group is about as
>>> realistic as a "laissez faire" society; the idea becomes
>>> a smokescreen for the strong or the lucky to establish
>>> unquestioned hegemony over others. /
>>>
>>> ï‚·/This hegemony can be so easily established because
>>> the idea of "structurelessness" does not prevent the
>>> formation of informal structures, only formal ones. /
>>>
>>> ï‚·/For everyone to have the opportunity to be involved
>>> in a given group and to participate in its activities,
>>> the structure must be explicit, not implicit. /
>>>
>>> ï‚·/It is this informal structure, particularly in
>>> Unstructured groups, which forms the basis for elites./
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just in case you have not yet encountered the full text
>>> of this essay, here it is:
>>>
>>> THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS
>>> by Jo Freeman aka Joreen
>>> http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Daniel
>>> http://www.OpenSpaceAgility.com/about
>>> http://www.DanielMezick.com
>>> 203 915 7248 <tel:203%20915%207248>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSList mailing list
>>> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>>> <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org>
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>>> <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org>
>>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>> Past archives can be viewed here:
>>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSList mailing list
>>> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>>> <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org>
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>>> <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org>
>>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>> Past archives can be viewed here:
>>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
>>>
>>> Â
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> OSList mailing list
>>>
>>> To post send emails toOSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send an email toOSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>
>>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>>>
>>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>>
>>> Past archives can be viewed here:http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Daniel Mezick, President
>>>
>>> New Technology Solutions Inc.
>>>
>>> (203) 915 7248 <tel:%28203%29%20915%207248> (cell)
>>>
>>> Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
>>> <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
>>> <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.Â
>>>
>>> Examine my new book:Â The Culture Game
>>> <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools
>>> for the Agile Manager.
>>>
>>> Explore Agile Team Training
>>> <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and
>>> Coaching. <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
>>>
>>> Explore the Agile Boston
>>> <http://newtechusa.net/user-groups/ma/>Community.Â
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Daniel Mezick, President
>>
>> New Technology Solutions Inc.
>>
>> (203) 915 7248 <tel:%28203%29%20915%207248> (cell)
>>
>> Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
>> <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
>>
>> Examine my new book:The Culture Game
>> <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools
>> for the Agile Manager.
>>
>> Explore Agile Team Training
>> <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and
>> Coaching. <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
>>
>> Explore the Agile Boston
>> <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>>
>> Michael Herman
>> Michael Herman Associates
>> http://MichaelHerman.com
>> http://OpenSpaceWorld.org
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Daniel Mezick, President
>
> New Technology Solutions Inc.
>
> (203) 915 7248 <tel:%28203%29%20915%207248> (cell)
>
> Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
> <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
>
> Examine my new book:The Culture Game
> <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the
> Agile Manager.
>
> Explore Agile Team Training
> <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching.
> <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
>
> Explore the Agile Boston
> <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
> Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
>
--
Michael M Pannwitz
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
++49 - 30-772 8000
Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 405 resident Open
Space Workers in 68 countries working in a total of 143 countries
worldwide: www.openspaceworldmap.org
More information about the OSList
mailing list