oslist will end soon -- it's time to deliberate, decide and act
sdaigle4 at comcast.net
sdaigle4 at comcast.net
Sat Dec 25 04:42:19 PST 2010
Wow Harold. The precious gift that you are giving to this community with
such loving attention and that wonderful sense of humor of yours plus the
extraordinary work of Michael over so many years are truly Christmas gifts
that never stop giving. Thank you so much to both of you. Suzanne
Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
-----Original message-----
From: Harold Shinsato <harold at shinsato.com>
To: OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
Sent: Thu, Jan 1, 1970 00:00:00 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: oslist will end soon -- it's time to deliberate, decide and act
Hi Raffi,
You're welcome. Thanks for insisting that I take a closer look. Bottom line
- no - this is not a problem and I don't think we need to process more
messages first. The conversion is working perfectly. But there is something
to consider.
The ListServ software collects the messages as they come in and creates a
separate archive file for each month. Looking over the 54 messages that
Michael Herman posted online to http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist.log9904
there's a message definitely marked as if it were from June 1999. So if you
take the messages at their word - the message is really from June 1999. So
the conversion did not introduce any errors. (You can check this yourself at
Michael's link.)
But based on the context, the one message with the June date stamp looks
like the person who sent it had put an invalid time stamp on their message.
I get messages like this sometimes from people who don't set the clock on
their computer properly.
The Mailman software does not collect the messages into separate files for
each month. Mailman stores the archived messages all in a single mbox file.
So the date sorting is very dependent on the timestamp on the messages being
accurate to sort them properly.
So even though the conversion happened properly - it might be worthwhile
going over all the ListServ archives and making a guess at the correct
timestamp. The message was written somewhere between April 17 and April 20,
1999 based on the message thread evidence. Hopefully it didn't happen that
often, as it's a bit of detective work for each message.
Happy Holidays!
Harold
On 12/24/10 5:10 PM, Raffi Aftandelian wrote:
> Harold, thanks for this. I'm really grateful that you have taken this
time,
> along with Michael Herman, to research a post-Boise home for OSlist.
>
> And just to clarify:
>
> You're saying that in your test run you converted one month, April 1999.
And
> that you're confident that the stray message from June 1999 (which isn't
> really from June 1999) should not be an indication of a problem?
>
> I don't know if you'd have the chance to do so, I'm wondering if you >
think it would be worthwhile to convert a few more months just to > make
sure that
> this conversion would work?
>
> happy holidays and belated yalda!
>
> appreciatively,
> Raffi
>
*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20101225/55a3b0ad/attachment-0016.htm>
More information about the OSList
mailing list