A Practice of Peace (Tova Averbuch)

[Fr Brian S Bainbridge]

Dear Julie
Thanks for the material evoked by the session with Fr Oleska.  Good sense
involved.
The Fifth option - "Here's where we are now. We don't know what it is yet"
seems to hold the greatest hope for the future of our world and for peace, I
suspect.
The real difficulty, for those of us living outside the US, is that so much
of what is being suggested relating to Peace from the US seems less than
consistent with that position.  Rather, it feels like imposition and control
and an almost ruthless requirement to conform to US rules.  Sometimes it
masquerades as WTO, sometimes as UN, sometimes as World Bank, and sometimes
as IMF.  And often it is preached as Globalization, as some recent deep
research shows.  As often happens, the preaching and the practice don't
appear to match and the recent decisions about steel simply demonstrate same
very clearly.  The "unum" mentioned is clearly a US "unum", not a world
"unum".
Maybe the real change that is needed in this dimension of peace-making is to
do with a change of heart within, and I think Open Space helps that by the
honouring and appreciating of spirit and the practice of letting-go.
Cheers and blessings,   BRIAN.

Julie Smith wrote:

> I had the pleasure last week of attending a presentation from Father
> Oleska, one of our state and national treasures.  Father Oleska is known
> for his insight and wisdom around communication and cross-cultural
> issues.  He is also a true believer in the power of story, and uses his
> personal stories to engage and entertain at the same time that he
> reveals important truths.  He is an inspiring and amazing man.
>
> As he was talking, he reminded us that one of the core ideas the United
> States was founded on is the principle of "E. Pluribus Unum," which is
> Latin for "From Many, One."  That idea is so core to us that it's
> printed on our money.  As I sit here this morning, I wonder if that's
> another way to think about peace.  I wonder whether E. Pluribus Unum is
> another way of expressing a desire for peace in the world, or perhaps is
> even a useful definition of peace.  From many, one.
>
> Father Oleska then talked about our social experiment with that lofty
> goal.  When he looks at history, he finds five responses to the
> difficulties we encounter when we try to make that shift from many to
> one.  In this case, he's talking about the shift from many cultures to
> one culture, from many peoples to one people.
>
> He says our five responses so far have been:
>
> 1.  Kill those who are different (so those who are left are One, an
> Unum)
> 2.  Remove those who are different (again, those remaining are an Unum)
> 3.  Assimilate those who are different (the melting pot)
> 4.  Accept all our differences (pluralism) (unfortunately, he joked,
> with this response we got "from many, many")
> 5.  ??? Here's where we are now.  We don't know what it is yet.
>
> He didn't spend much time trying to define where it is we are now, or
> where it is he thought we should go. He wasn't a bit theoretical or
> political or even philosophic or religious.  He just kept telling us
> stories.  He made us laugh and cry and along the way he helped us
> understand his story and the stories of those he has known.
>
> When I think about the lessons I learned from Father Oleska, I think his
> message was to get to know each other, one person at a time.  Spend time
> with each other, tell your stories, begin to reach a deeper
> understanding of each other.  And then it occurs to me that perhaps we
> are being challenged to move beyond that old adage "Know Thyself" to
> "Know Each Other."
>
> And now, back on that spiral of expanding consciousness, I think perhaps
> for me some of the markers on the path look like this:
>
> Know thyself (as a separate self)
> Know each other
> Know thyself (as One)
>
> And..... perhaps the "Know each other" stage naturally raises issues of
> chaos and complexity, because it IS chaotic and complex..... and the
> third stage of "Know thyself (as One)" is the simplicity that comes
> after complexity.
>
> Or how about this:
>
> Know thyself [From many separate selves]
> Know each other [,]
> Know thyself [One Self]
>
> And the [,] is where we are now..... that pause in time signified by the
> comma..... and Open Space is one of the ways we do the work that is
> needed in the pause, the getting to know each other that is necessary to
> make the transition between the other two.
>
> For me, that peace we're reaching for resides in the integration of
> these three stages.  From many, one.
>
> This has been quite a ramble.... thanks to you who made it all the way
> to the end.
>
> Julie
>
> *
> *
> ==========================================================
> OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> ------------------------------
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu,
> Visit:
>
> http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: briansb.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 174 bytes
Desc: Card for Fr Brian S Bainbridge
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20020420/c7de1bf0/attachment-0017.vcf>