Fw: Boris Kagarlitsky, Moscow Times
Artur F. Silva
artsilva at mail.eunet.pt
Fri Sep 28 14:47:00 PDT 2001
[This position, from a Russian sociologist, worths reading. I don't know
if it makes any sense or not; you will know better, I think - Artur]
>"Bin Laden? Better Be Sure"
> by
>Boris Kagarlitsky, Moscow Times
>
>
>
>
> The terrorist attack on New York has
> already been compared to
> Pearl Harbor and the loss of the Kursk
> submarine. Mikhail
> Gorbachev likened it to Chernobyl, which
> is probably a very
> accurate analogy in terms of the shock
> and ignominy experienced
> by the U.S. administration. In both
> cases, we saw incompetence
> and helplessness initially, followed by
> desperate attempts at
> official face-saving.
>
> There is, however, one analogy that does
> not seem to have
> occurred to anyone: the burning of the
> Reichstag. The anti-Arab
> and anti-Moslem hysteria that has
> followed around the globe in
> the wake of the catastrophe simply calls
> out for comparison with
> the events of the 1930s. The U.S.
> authorities immediately started
> the search for the guilty among Arabs,
> Osama bin Laden cropped
> up almost immediately as prime suspect
> and alternative versions
> have barely been entertained. In the
> minutes immediately following
> the explosions, it seems there was no
> doubt whatsoever regarding
> the "Arab" source of the attacks.
> However, the more evidence
> and arguments adduced in support of the
> "Arab version," the
> more shaky it seems to become. In a
> television appearance
> immediately after the explosions, the
> well-known pundit
> Vyacheslav Nikonov noted that the guilty
> would undoubtedly be
> found, and if not, they would be
> "nominated," adding cynically: "It
> would be in Russia's interest if the
> Taliban and bin Laden were
> nominated." To give him his due,
> Alexander Gordon -- who
> spoke on two TV programs -- pointed out
> that it could be
> far-right militia groups (such as those
> behind the Oklahoma City
> bombing) and not Islamic terrorists at
> all. Analysts have
> emphasized how easy it would be to carry
> out each individual
> element of the terrorist operation:
> smuggling knives aboard a
> plane, breaking into the cockpit, etc.
>
> However to coordinate all these actions
> in different parts of the
> country without making a single serious
> blunder is devilishly hard.
> The crime committed on Sept. 11 must have
> required enormous
> efforts in management, control and
> logistics. The strength of
> Islamic terrorism is in the simplicity of
> organization and its
> unpredictability. All groups operate
> autonomously. Even the destruction of
> command centers doesn't
> have a major impact, insofar as every one
> of Allah's warriors is
> capable of acting on his own. The attacks
> on New York and
> Washington were very carefully
> coordinated, the minutest details
> were thoroughly thought through, and at
> no stage were there
> serious lapses. It would appear that the
> operation was organized
> and carried out by people who had free
> passage around the
> country and were considered to be above
> suspicion. If they are
> professionals, they did not acquire their
> experience in
> underground terrorist groups. It cannot
> be excluded that the
> attacks were organized by forces within
> the United States, and
> this would have to be people with
> considerable military
> experience. Why is it that no seems even
> to consider a conspiracy
> by far-right groups as a possibility? The
> masterminds could easily
> have covertly used people of Arab
> nationality to carry out the
> attacks. Whoever it is behind the
> Washington and New York
> attacks, in Russia and Israel they have
> already played a role
> comparable to the burning of the
> Reichstag. Far-right politicians --
> "upholders of the values of western
> civilisation" -- have already
> spoken out calling for revenge. Over and
> over, one and the same
> thing is repeated: "Moslems are subhuman
> barbarians and you
> cannot conduct negotiations with them.
> They are not like us, and
> thus our criteria of democracy and human
> rights do not apply to
> them." "No need to fear unpopular
> measures," some say. "No
> need to limit ourselves to democratic
> conventions," others chime
> in. At a minimum they are after: arrests
> without warrants, mass
> deportations and wide-scale searches.
> Already reports are
> coming from the United States of racist
> attacks against Islamic
> communities. It is clear that mass
> repressions will lead to mass
> resistance. That is how you make enemies.
> Do those who are
> trying to scare us with the Moslem threat
> really not understand
> that? They understand it full well. They
> simply believe that a final
> solution is possible -- if not globally,
> then at least on a more
> limited territory. As a maximum, they are
> baying for ethnic
> cleansing and genocide.
>
>
>
> 26/09/2001 . 23:56
>
>Boris Kagarlitsky is a Moscow-based sociologist.
*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu,
Visit:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
More information about the OSList
mailing list