Story of a small OS

[Birgitt Williams]

Hi Chris,
this is a terrific story and I like your recommendation about a large room
:-)

About the comment that it was "light", it is my experience that when a
facilitator sits for the opening, no matter how small the group thereby the
discomfort of the facilitator, participants don't go as deeply as they do
when the facilitator does the obvious walking of circle (shaman's
walk-feminine energy) and into the centre (hero's walk-masculine energy). I
understand the importance of the walk from my study of the ICHING. The book
of changes. The situations come in threes, the first is masculine, the
second is feminine energy, and the third is integrated and so on through all
64. Something about 64 to do with our DNA too.

Birgitt

Birgitt Williams
Make Genuine Contact!
Dalar Associates: organizational
effectiveness consultants

Striving for Success? Ready to exceed
your expectations?

Contact us for consulting services, training,
conference and meeting facilitation,
and keynote speaking.

www.openspacetechnology.com <http://www.openspacetechnology.com>


-----Original Message-----
From: OSLIST [mailto:OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU]On Behalf Of Chris
Corrigan
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 3:46 AM
To: OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
Subject: Story of a small OS


Hi friends:

I ran a small one day OS today, and thought I would share the story here
as there are occaisionally requests for how to run small ones.

The group was a unit in a larger federal government office.  In their
daily lives the unit members mostly interact with people from other
units, and not with each other.  As a result, the unit has somethig of a
"muskox" mentality -- a metaphor derived from an animal that forms a
circle with others for protection by facing outwards.  In this case,
facing outwards means that the unit members collaborate with others, but
rarely within in their unit.

The OS was around the question of how the unit could respond to some
office wide policy initiatives, so it forced the group members to focus
on the life of the unit rather than their individual projects.  This was
the original reason I suggested OS to the Director.

The plan for the day was three one hour dialogue sessions, followed by a
lunch break and a visit from the office's CEO.  My plan was to have the
reports completed over lunch and during the CEO meeting and ready for
some convergence in the afternoon.

We had nine people, about half of whom had done an OS.  The circle was
too small to walk around so I sat in a chair with the rest of them, but
I leaned in a little at the beginning to do my opening.  We had 12
agenda items come forward.  When it was time to sign up, the group
merged some items together and ended up with six, then they decided that
they all wanted to go to all of them, so they stayed together as a group
and worked over the next three hours on the issues.  Time definitely
blurred, and as there were no competing sessions, the OS principles
relating to starting and ending were in clear evidence.  They talked as
long as they needed too, and covered all the issues, which eventually
got merged into four reports.

The space remained open during lunch and the arrival of the CEO, who
joined the circle and picked up where the group had left off.  She spent
two hours with the group in some pretty free flowing dialogue, while I
prepared the rest of the room for convergence.

When the CEO left, the group reconvened in the original circle (they
moved between this circle and a table which they spent the morning
meeting around -- not my choice, but what happened was...anyway it
worked for them) and we did a full convergence of the four topic areas.
When I asked for a volunteer to convene the convergence, the one true
butterfly volunteered, gave the group a half an hour and was draconian
in getting them focussed on the task at hand.  This was exactly what the
group wanted, and it ensured that they got finished on time, without
rehashing issues.

Everything ran so smoothly that I was able to email the conference
proceedings back to their office (four blocks away) before they had
packed up and left.

Comments in the closing included one I found interesting.  One woman,
who was a little sceptical that the group should hold an OS (even though
she was an advocate of the process) stated that she felt that the day
was "light -- not in content, but in feeling."  I noticed this too, and
put it down to the fact that the discussions were very collegial, truly
dialogic in a Bohm-ian sense, and that the process worked.  I'm sure OS
had a lot to do with this.

Doing OS in a small group is definitely possible, but for the
facilitator there are some special challenges.  I was very visible
throughout the whole day as I tried to make myself disappear, but
staying in the room made me stick out and in leaving I was conspicuous
in my abscence.  A couple of people noticed this and felt uncomfortable
with how much I was charging vs how little I appeared to be doing.  I
just smiled.  They were truly a self-facilitating group, so there was
little for me to do anyway, but I did feel uncomfortable.  I wonder how
it would have been if there was a lot of conflict and they felt like
they needed a facilitator.  I would have been between a rock and a hard
place there. At any rate, it's not like a large conference, where you
can just slip away.  Even picking up coffee cups was distracting to
them.

In truth, my work was really done when I did the opening because it got
the items that needed to be talked about out in the open.  From there,
it became a long conversation around those points.  I don't think they
would have come up with an identical agenda if we had used another
meeting process.  That was where I made my money, I think (not to be too
crass about it!).

Another lesson is that holding the space for nine people is as taxing as
holding the space for 250.  I figured this would be the case, so I
didn't skimp on my preparation, and I'm glad I didn't.  I needed all my
wits and strength to be quiet in that room for 6.5 hours.

One advantage of working in a small group is that you get a lot more
flexibility with time, and it meant that we were able to do more
convergence than I initially thought possible, and it meant that
everyone could participate in that.

So for those of you contemplating very small OS events, take heart, it
can be done.  My one recommendation is to use a fairly large room with
lots of space in it so you can fade away when you need to.  There's also
something nice about a small group meeting in large space.  They tend to
become hushed and considerate and respectful, like a small congregation
in a cathedral.  They chunk down the space to suit their needs but
remain aware of the large amount of space around them.  It's a little
humbling, and makes for a useful environment to diffuse control issues.

Hope this is useful.

Chris

--
CHRIS CORRIGAN
108-1035 Pacific Street
Vancouver BC
V6E 4G7

Phone: 604.683.3080
Fax: 604.683.3036

(GO LEAFS GO!)