"Modified Open Space"

Jody Orr jorr at worldchat.com
Tue Apr 21 21:16:43 PDT 1998


Birgitt,

Thanks to all who are making this such a vital dialogue. I particularly
want to honour the observations from Kay of the deceptive simplicity of
Open Space and the challenges which come with this simplicity and Larry's
commitment to encouraging "true" connection to Spirit.

Time and again, what comes clear to me is that when the principles and law
abide, Spirit emerges. I support your intervention in the first story and
am not troubled by the third story. It is the second story which concerns
me...it  suggests an Open Space which went awry and when Open Space events
go awry and/or principles and law are abandoned - for a wide variety of
reasons and sometimes even after the event -  damage to organizations and
systems - to say nothing of the people who live their lives within them -
can occur. Whether good intentions going in can compensate for damage
coming out is open for discussion. This concern has nothing to do with
“purity” of practice: it has to do with “doing no harm”. To the extent that
learning more about setting the context, preparing the ground, and opening
and holding space may better prepare us to "do no harm", the community of
Open Space practitioners needs to continue its work of creating a body of
knowledge through research and story-telling and sharing. I have for some
time, as you know, been convinced and am still convinced that learning,
sharing learning, and growing a body of practice, experience and knowledge
is the most effective vehicle for maximizing "safe space" for Open Space.
That individual Open Space events will go awry and that damage may occur as
a result may be only one more manifestation of the shadow: we need to
acknowledge it and be prepared to heal and nurture where we can.

There is, I think, a significant difference between “rigidity” and “purism”
(which we were warned against in earlier responses to your question) and
the experiential learning and retention of that which works and reflects
the essentials, the principles, the intuitive understanding of how energy
is working in the circle, etc. Within this envelope, there is, as you
pointed out, tremendous scope for individual creativity in how space is
opened and held and even in how effective we might each individually be
from time to time...thank goodness...what a boring world it would be if we
all did it the same way!

So, while I share your concerns, the very principles of Open Space itself
suggest that we need to be open and responsive to outcome, even where the
outcome is problematic and calls for healing.

Spirit be with you,

Jody



More information about the OSList mailing list