<div dir="ltr">if you are asking if it's my experience that public and private events are different, i can say yes, sometimes they are. i think there can be different mixes of those four conditions. i can also say that i don't find the public/private distinction a useful predictor of what to expect. it might be that number of hours or breakout sessions has something to do with it. it might be that number of people matters. lots of potential indicators, i imagine.<div><br></div><div>leaving that aside, i'm not sure at all that classifying meetings or events in this way helps me know what to do differently going into it. i always have to be ready for anything, at least that's my experience of things. i do think that where those conditions are highest, facilitating might be easiest. the events tend to be longer and i can do less sooner. but there aren't any fixed rules about that. sooner is completely relative and needs to be defined every time.</div><div><br></div><div>as for intent and advancing the work, i wasn't doubting or questioning your intention to advance the work. i just didn't hear a question so much as maybe the beginning of telling us what advancing would be. i heard what sounded to me like statements, asking for agreement. it seemed that agreement to first statements might have logical implications that i hadn't yet heard. </div><div><br></div><div>my "maybe" question is whether those agreements are necessary at all. public or private aside, some situations have more of those conditions than others. that's surely true. it's worth noticing the relative levels in the run-up to an event. i don't think broad agreement about public/private as the indicator is necessary to have a conversation about what to do when these things run high. or am i missing something? </div><div><br></div><div>i am curious what anyone can say about what are the *direct* indicators that tell you that complexity or diversity or passion might be high? before or during an event? where do you feel or see or taste it? and what do you do differently when you sense it? </div><div><br></div><div>if your default setting is that public and private are different, how do you set them up differently? is what you do in public events not ost, but in orgs it is? </div><div><br></div><div>i find my own practice is pretty much the same everywhere, the inner sensing i bring to the situation. the quality of attention. different things happen every time, and some of them are the things i do differently. but the space that i point to is always the same. is it different for you?</div><div><br></div><div>m</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"> <br>--<br><br>Michael Herman<br>Michael Herman Associates<br>312-280-7838 (mobile)<br><br><a href="http://MichaelHerman.com" target="_blank">http://MichaelHerman.com</a><br><a href="http://OpenSpaceWorld.org" target="_blank">http://OpenSpaceWorld.org</a><br><br></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Daniel Mezick <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dan@newtechusa.net" target="_blank">dan@newtechusa.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class="">
<br>
<br>
<div>On 4/26/15 2:53 PM, Michael Herman
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">it seems to me that the questions that might be
raised a neighborhood or professional conference can be every
bit as complex, the people every bit as diverse, and the passion
just as high as in any organization where folks are getting paid
to show up. <br>
</div>
</blockquote></span>
yes and I suspect (strongly) that all things being equal, the
private/org OST events have more of the preconditions in place, more
often, than public events, especially with respect to Agile
conferences, where I have some direct experience.<span class=""><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">the think organizations might be better at is
manufacturing a sense of urgency. perhaps they do that by
constricting flow with deadlines and other constraints. <br>
</div>
</blockquote></span>
yes and so?<span class=""><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>coming from the other direction, it might be said that in
more diffused settings, like communities and conferences,
having the focus and bounding that an invitation and circle
and meeting date provide are as beneficial as the opening in
an organization. <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></span>
yes, and all other things being equal, once again, i think this is
unlikely in my view. the cohesion and intrigue and history of
relationships and cultural stories by and between the members is
likely to much richer inside organizations, since the people have
closer proximity, higher frequency of interactions, over longer
period of time etc. just saying<span class=""><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>this leaves aside the messiness of trying to decide where
private becomes public. what about when companies open space
with clients. what is it when the mayor of harrisonburg or
the city of aspen or the school board in peoria convenes the
gathering(s)? <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></span>
yes and i did directly address this exceptionin the original post.
communities and communities of practice being the obvious
hybrid/grey area. that said, once again all other things being
equal, i currently believe the private event is richer. <br>
<br>
consider the public event where unconference and barcamp are often
used instead of OST. why? perhaps because cohesion & commitment
is lower in public vs private events...all other things being equal
once again that is....<span class=""><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>i guess i don't understand why it matters to determine if
opening space is more or less effective in organization or
professional conference. and i'm not sure we can even know,
even if it did matter. <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></span>
yes and it does matter. it matters a lot. it matters when we try to
develop more precise language to describe what we are talking about
when we discuss OST.<span class=""><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>in 2002, i facilitated only just a slice, one track, of the
agile/xp conference, for instance. it was messy, for sure.
my briefing was from the podium in front of a ballroom
theater of 300 seated, having just heard three hours of
keynotes. the wall and posters and all the trimmings were
around the corner and down the hall in another room that
nobody'd seen yet. the actual posting of topics didn't happen
until after they went to lunch and some of them came over to
the room i'd prepared. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>it seemed to work and not. it was a little weird for me
and yet there was much of the familiar energy and
self-organizing. that said, i was quite surprised, EIGHT
years later, one of the agile alliance board members told me
he thought that it had been hugely successful and with
important results that were continuing. <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></span>
yes, and novelty is a wonderful thing. right? i wonder how much
novelty was produced that day, and how many people (what percentage
of them....70? 80? 95?) were introduced to open space that day, thus
generating said novelty<span class=""><br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>that's an unscientific sample and it wasn't the only
contributing factor, but that we did it did seem to matter,
and contribute something to the connection between agile and
open space. <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></span>
yes and the agile community has done little in terms of
disciplined/methodical/scientific experimenting, studying,
generating case studies and documenting the results of creatively
using OST in agile adoptions. as it stands, very little evidence has
been generated that might indicate frequent use of OST to facilitate
the pain of process-change in an agile context. rather we continue
to use OST in mere public-Agile-conference events. this is now
changing and more rapidly.<span class=""><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>IF we all agreed that there was something very different
about public and private os meetings, WHAT would that
accomplish or imply? <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>what would we do differently? what difference would it
make in our practicing? <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></span>
We might consider the distinctions to a) advance the state of the
art, b) develop more know-how in both situations, and c) maybe just
maybe get better at bringing development and transformation to
organizations, especially in an agile-process-change context, and
especially in large, slow-to-change organizations that represent the
largest challenges to success with rapid and lasting development and
transformation. that is my odd fascination, and my intent in raising
the issue generally.<span class=""><br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>would we stop facilitating conferences or community events?
probably not, i think. would we open differently in
organizations and communities? well, i think we already
probably open a bit differently in every different place we
go. it's always starts with whatever people are there in a
new place where we're invited to work. i'm not sure where
this can lead us. <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></span>
yes, and that is a great starting point, is it not? close to ideal
perhaps...<span class=""><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>wondering, daniel, is this an exploration of uncharted
territory or are you laying the groundwork for a larger
story. IF what you say is absolutely true, where do we go?
can we go there even if the answer is "maybe?" <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></span>
yea and in general, there is an allergy around the use of precise
language. the vague language with fewer terms and words and words
with multiple meanings can be the cause of many sorrows for those
trying to learn this stuff. consider the newb on OSLIST how it
trying to grok this stuff. How does vague language that does not
make distinctions between this and that context serve that new
student? as it stands, there is no agreed-upon definition for OST,
because OST is a spirit that defies definition. and even when it
does not, there are plenty of people that are happy to to the
defying. the five preconditions for good OST provide a starting
point for discussion. what you are really asking is "what is your
intent Daniel?" and the intent is to advance the work. <br><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<br>
<br>
Daniel <br></font></span><div><div class="h5">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>m</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div> <br>
--<br>
<br>
Michael Herman<br>
Michael Herman Associates<br>
<a href="tel:312-280-7838" value="+13122807838" target="_blank">312-280-7838</a> (mobile)<br>
<br>
<a href="http://MichaelHerman.com" target="_blank">http://MichaelHerman.com</a><br>
<a href="http://OpenSpaceWorld.org" target="_blank">http://OpenSpaceWorld.org</a><br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:43 PM,
Daniel Mezick via OSList <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:oslist@lists.openspacetech.org" target="_blank">oslist@lists.openspacetech.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Yo Harrison, <br>
<br>
Where are you lately hearing about 'scaling up' OST? <br>
<br>
I'm interested in knowing the origin of that. <br>
<br>
Daniel <br>
<div>
<div> <br>
<div>On 4/26/15 12:12 PM, Harrison via OSList wrote:<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">To
add a bit... The 4 (actually 5)
“preconditions” were simply what I, and
others, had observed to be the situation. I
can’t actually remember, but I think my
original motivation was to question what
seemed to be the conventional wisdom regarding
what it took to have a good meeting. I think
we all know the drill – there should be a
clear agenda, closely ordered procedure,
something close to absolute control, and the
like. With thoughts like these in mind, Open
Space was not only counterintuitive, but
wrong, dangerous, and obviously heretical.
What we were experiencing was definitely a
horse of a different color. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">And
yes, Jeff, there is certainly no “requirement”
that all conditions be at maximum red alert.
That said, if none are present there would
seem to be little reason have a meeting, let
alone Open Space. After all who would want to
waste the time when there was no business
issue, everything was crystal clear, everyone
thought exactly the same way, no passion or
conflict, and the sense of urgency
non-existent? Sounds like a non-starter to me.
Then again it constantly amazes me that every
day in organizations all over the world folks
hold meetings just because you are supposed
to. Is it any wonder that people are bored,
disengaged, and cynical?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">But
actually what really got me excited was when I
realized that my “5 Preconditions” almost
exactly paralleled the essential preconditions
for self organization as described by Stuart
Kauffmann and others. That made a connection
which produced my greatest learning in and
about Open Space. It is all self organization.
It is not a process we/I created, invented, or
whatever. All we actually “do” is to invite
people to remember what they have been doing
for ever. Well at least for the last 13.7
billion years. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">And
just for a tag line .... to those who might be
thinking about “scaling up” Open Space, I
would suggest you save your energy. It’s
already happened. It is all self organizing.
It is all open space. Of course it is true
that things get pretty sloppy and gooey when
we set about organizing a self organizing
system. Oh well.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Harrison</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Winter
Address</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">7808
River Falls Drive</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Potomac,
MD 20854</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><a href="tel:301-365-2093" value="+13013652093" target="_blank">301-365-2093</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Summer
Address</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">189
Beaucaire Ave.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Camden,
ME 04843</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><a href="tel:207-763-3261" value="+12077633261" target="_blank">207-763-3261</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Websites</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><a href="http://%20www.openspaceworld.com" target="_blank"> www.openspaceworld.com</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><a href="http://www.ho-image.com" target="_blank">www.ho-image.com</a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">OSLIST
</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Consolas;color:#1f497d">To
subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of OSLIST Go to:<a href="http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org" target="_blank">http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org</a></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
OSList [<a href="mailto:oslist-bounces@lists.openspacetech.org" target="_blank">mailto:oslist-bounces@lists.openspacetech.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Jeff Aitken via
OSList<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, April 26, 2015 11:31
AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Daniel Mezick; World wide Open
Space Technology email list<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [OSList] OST: Public
vs Private events: apples and oranges?</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Daniel. When Harrison's
four conditions came out way back when, I
imagined them as a way to tell a client that
even in the most challenging situation it's
quite possible that Open Space will work very
well. In other words, don't hesitate to consider
it, even if you're afraid things are just too
messy to try this strange new process.</p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Having hosted and seen many
great open spaces in which the scores were
low, so to speak, I never took seriously that
these are absolute preconditions. To me they
are a kind of inoculation against a
prospective sponsor being afraid to make that
phone call or send that email. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">With lots of appreciation
for your good work</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jeff</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Lagunitas, California</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
<br>
-------- Original message --------<br>
From: Daniel Mezick via OSList <br>
Date:04/26/2015 6:20 AM (GMT-08:00) <br>
To: World wide Open Space Technology email list
<br>
Subject: [OSList] OST: Public vs Private events:
apples and oranges? <br>
<br>
Greetings All,<br>
<br>
...I notice these well-worn, well-understood set
of starting conditions for great Open Space, on
Wikipedia...hmm...</p>
<p><WIKIPEDIA><br>
Hundreds of Open Space meetings have been
documented.<sup><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Space_Technology#cite_note-4" target="_blank">[4]</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Space_Technology#cite_note-5" target="_blank">[5]</a></sup> Harrison Owen
explains that this approach works best when
these conditions are present,<sup><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Space_Technology#cite_note-OST-3" target="_blank">[3]</a></sup> namely high
levels of</p>
<ol start="1" type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal"><i>Complexity</i>, in
terms of the tasks to be done or outcomes
achieved;</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><i>Diversity</i>, in terms
of the people involved and/or needed to make
any solution work;</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><i>Conflict, real or
potential</i>, meaning people really care
about the central issue or purpose; and</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><i>Urgency</i>, meaning
that the time to act was "yesterday".</li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"></WIKIPEDIA><br>
<br>
<br>
In an organization, we could work with formally
authorized leaders to gauge the magnitude of
each dimension. So for example we could gauge or
rank the magnitude, with 1 being lowest and 10
being the highest magnitude for gauging each
dimension. For a really nice opportunity to use
Open Space, we might be looking for a combined
score of, say, 32 or higher (out of a possible
40)<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
The Public Conference Event<br>
<br>
Now let's consider the PUBLIC conference event.
What is the typical combined score in a public
conference... for these 4 elements? I am
guessing the combined score is something like 20
or lower for the typical conference event. Maybe
25 out of a perfect 40? The cohesion is just
(generally speaking!) <i>so much lower</i> in a
public vs org-based (private) event...<br>
<br>
<br>
<HERESY><br>
And that is why I think OST is for "development
and transformation in organizations" (that
actual subtitle of the SPIRIT book) and that it
is not at all as effective, in terms of impact,
when implemented in a public conference. <br>
</HERESY><br>
<br>
I am guessing the scores for the 4 dimensions
are almost always be lower in a public vs.
private event. <br>
<br>
Certainly that is my general subjective
observation, based on a small sample of direct
experience (less than 20 experiences doing OST
inside corporations...)<br>
<br>
...Yes: some exceptions do exist. As is almost
always the case. Right? That said, I feel these
exceptions prove the general rule... that
private events have a much higher combined
score, all else being equal.<br>
<br>
Ironically, the OST format was originally
formulated to ease the effort required to
arrange and execute public conference events. <br>
<br>
And then....<br>
<br>
<br>
Daniel <br>
<br>
</p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">-- <br>
<br>
</p>
<p>Daniel Mezick, President</p>
<p>New Technology Solutions Inc.</p>
<p><a href="tel:%28203%29%20915%207248" value="+12039157248" target="_blank">(203)
915 7248</a> (cell)</p>
<p><span><a href="http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/" target="_blank">Bio</a></span><span>. <a href="http://newtechusa.net/blog/" target="_blank"><span>Blog</span></a>. <a href="http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/" target="_blank"><span>Twitter</span></a>.</span><span><span style="color:black"> </span></span></p>
<p><span>Examine my new book:</span><span><span style="color:black"> </span></span><span><a href="http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/" target="_blank"><span>The Culture Game </span></a></span><span>:
Tools for the Agile Manager</span><span>.</span></p>
<p>Explore Agile Team <a href="http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/" target="_blank"><span>Training</span></a>
and <a href="http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/" target="_blank"><span>Coaching.</span></a></p>
<p>Explore the <a href="http://newtechusa.net/user-groups/ma/" target="_blank"><span>Agile Boston </span></a>Community.<span> </span></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<pre>_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to <a href="mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org" target="_blank">OSList@lists.openspacetech.org</a>
To unsubscribe send an email to <a href="mailto:OSList-leave@lists.openspacetech.org" target="_blank">OSList-leave@lists.openspacetech.org</a>
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
<a href="http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org" target="_blank">http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org</a>
Past archives can be viewed here: <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<span> <br>
<div>-- <br>
<p>Daniel Mezick, President</p>
<p>New Technology Solutions Inc.</p>
<p><a href="tel:%28203%29%20915%207248" value="+12039157248" target="_blank">(203) 915
7248</a> (cell)</p>
<p><span><a href="http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/" target="_blank">Bio</a></span><span>. <a href="http://newtechusa.net/blog/" target="_blank"><span>Blog</span></a>. <a href="http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/" target="_blank"><span>Twitter</span></a>.<span> </span></span></p>
<p><span>Examine my new book:<span> </span><a href="http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/" target="_blank"><span>The Culture Game </span></a></span><span>:
Tools for the Agile Manager</span><span>.</span></p>
<p>Explore Agile Team <a href="http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/" target="_blank"><span>Training</span></a> and <a href="http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/" target="_blank"><span>Coaching.</span></a></p>
<p>Explore the <a href="http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/" target="_blank"><span>Agile Boston </span></a>Community.<span> </span></p>
</div>
</span></div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
OSList mailing list<br>
To post send emails to <a href="mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org" target="_blank">OSList@lists.openspacetech.org</a><br>
To unsubscribe send an email to <a href="mailto:OSList-leave@lists.openspacetech.org" target="_blank">OSList-leave@lists.openspacetech.org</a><br>
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:<br>
<a href="http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org" target="_blank">http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org</a><br>
Past archives can be viewed here: <a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org" target="_blank">http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div>-- <br>
<p>Daniel Mezick, President</p>
<p>New Technology Solutions Inc.</p>
<p><a href="tel:%28203%29%20915%207248" value="+12039157248" target="_blank">(203) 915 7248</a> (cell)</p>
<p><span><a href="http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/" target="_blank">Bio</a></span><span>. <a href="http://newtechusa.net/blog/" target="_blank"><span>Blog</span></a>. <a href="http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/" target="_blank"><span>Twitter</span></a>.<span> </span></span></p>
<p><span>Examine my new book:<span> </span><a href="http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/" target="_blank"><span>The Culture Game </span></a></span><span>: Tools for the Agile Manager</span><span>.</span></p>
<p>Explore Agile Team <a href="http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/" target="_blank"><span>Training</span></a> and <a href="http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/" target="_blank"><span>Coaching.</span></a></p>
<p>Explore the <a href="http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/" target="_blank"><span>Agile
Boston </span></a>Community.<span> </span></p>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>