<p>I've never used any form of feedback. It only reinforces actor-spectator, producer-consumer and the like that come old worldview of reductionism we are to avoid.</p>
<p>There seems to be one stage and we all are participants of the great dance of Siva of our Cosmic Conrciousness.</p>
<p>mh's comment seems much attactive to me. </p>
<p>Thank you ;-))</p>
<p>Spirit powered by OST</p>
<p>spark</p>
<p>Director<br>
Open Space Institute of Korea<br>
<a href="http://openspace.kr">http://openspace.kr</a><br>
</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">2011. 5. 25. 오전 12:42에 "Michael Herman" <<a href="mailto:michael@michaelherman.com">michael@michaelherman.com</a>>님이 작성:<br><br>i have always advised against feedback and evaluation forms, harold, because i can only imagine two main kinds of feedback: the food was too cold/room was too hot (which really doesn't matter) and there should have been a session/design for this or for that (which really just pushes responsibility for their experience back to the hosts). the only kind of feedback or evaluation that seems useful would be to help suggest that this was worth doing, so as to support funding for more of the same, but anyone funding more of them ought to be able to evaluate the proceedings themselves to decide if the event worked. when a form of some kind is an absolute non-negotiable must do, i suggest three questions of this sort: what did you see happening during the event? what got done because of the event? and, given that, what are the issues or opportunities you would put on the wall next time? the answers to these more directly evaluate the work of the group and feed directly into the writing of future invitation(s). in this way, there is no break in the action, ownership, responsibility, etc. there's a bit more, and some different questions, posted here: <a href="http://www.michaelherman.com/cgi/wiki.cgi?EvaluatingOpenSpace" target="_blank">http://www.michaelherman.com/cgi/wiki.cgi?EvaluatingOpenSpace</a><br>
<br>m<br><br clear="all"> <br>--<br><br>Michael Herman<br>Michael Herman Associates<br>312-280-7838 (mobile)<br><br><a href="http://MichaelHerman.com" target="_blank">http://MichaelHerman.com</a><br><a href="http://ManorNeighbors.com" target="_blank">http://ManorNeighbors.com</a><br>
<a href="http://OpenSpaceWorld.org" target="_blank">http://OpenSpaceWorld.org</a><br><br><br><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><p><font color="#500050">On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Harold Shinsato <<a href="mailto:harold@shinsato.com">harold@shinsato.com</a>> wrote:</font></p><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">
<p><font color="#500050">><br>> What do Open Space facilitators think about soliciting "feedback" as part of an improvement proc...</font></p>_______________________________________________<br>
OSList mailing list<br>
To post send emails to <a href="mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org" target="_blank">OSList@lists.openspacetech.org</a><br>
To unsubscribe send an email to <a href="mailto:OSList-leave@lists.openspacetech.org" target="_blank">OSList-leave@lists.openspacetech.org</a><br>
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:<br>
<a href="http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org" target="_blank">http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
OSList mailing list<br>
To post send emails to <a href="mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org">OSList@lists.openspacetech.org</a><br>
To unsubscribe send an email to <a href="mailto:OSList-leave@lists.openspacetech.org">OSList-leave@lists.openspacetech.org</a><br>
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:<br>
<a href="http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org" target="_blank">http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></p>