<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Harrison wrote in "A first step from
Rome":</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><EM>... Since my time 10 years ago in South Africa, it has been clear to me
that OS has enormous power for what we might call conflict resolution, but it is
a resolution that does not eliminate conflict. If anything the conflict is
magnified, but space is provided so that the conflict, and the energy it
contains, may become a positive force.</EM></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>It really is about "holding", isn't it?
About creating, and simply (!) by being fully
present preserving, the temenos within which people are allowed, even
encouraged, to be fully who they are so that "the third", the new, the
transcendent other possibilities, can emerge. And when people are "opened",
they can give themselves permission to share deeply and thereby create community
- at least while they are still in the protected space! </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV><EM>... All we do in Open Space is to create the conditions under which a
completely natural process can start or re-start. If true, this is really good
news, for it would mean that we already have at our disposal the "tools"
necessary for peace. We have only to be fully what we are. </EM></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>If the process (self organisation) is "completely
natural", why does it need to be "started"? Surely it must be going on all the
time. If that is so, then perhaps we need some kind of a modifier here;
like "at a conscious level" or "activate" or ... </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Also, when I read your post I was reminded
of various related ways in which the concept of the "safe container"
(the "permeable circle" we create for groups in OS) is used in the language
of both individual and group therapy. <STRONG>Is
OS "therapy"?</STRONG> (as opposed to simply "therapeutic")? If it is,
should it be practised by anyone? Psychologists are required to have at
least some knowledge of the terrain of the psyche, even if a major part of
their activity is listening. Are we not then required to have some
knowledge of group dynamics and other "facilitator skills" to engage in our
practice of OS? Especially if we are to dabble in such profoundly important
arenas as world peace?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Just some thots for rumination, or
not...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Namaste</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Winston</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>