[OSList] Trello Boards & Open Space

[Tony Budak]

Hi Michael,

Thanks so much for taking time to send a fascinating reply. It's a bit 
over the top for me to quickly comprehend. I do see the critical thought 
that went in to the "Task Cards".  It's is simply "super". Thanks again. 
I will study your thoughts.

Thanks for the great point emphasizing, my miss use of explain as in 
experience. Yes of course, doing with as an experience to live is my 
deep intention, but my use of words were not good. Yes, the language is 
so very important, Thank again.

Hope some day to interview you. All my contact info is here:
Please CLICK the following to set up meeting details.
https://pickatime.acuityscheduling.com/

Thanks for creating our tomorrows,
Tony


On 8/14/2019 2:27 AM, Michael M Pannwitz via OSList wrote:
> Looking at the invitation to share, I share the "Task Cards for 
> Setting up an Open Space event" (first published in 2006 with 6 
> editions, the latest in 2013), structured in 3 stages: "To do!", "In 
> progress!" and "Done!".
> It provides Task Cards for three stages of an OST event (41 in yellow 
> for setting up, 18 in blue for the time the OST is running and 10 in 
> green for the Outlook and Action Planning phase.)
> The sixth edition of the  2013 edition "set" comes with a two page "A 
> User's Guide" (all editions were published both in English and German, 
> some other language versions appeared in Chinese, Polish, Ukrainian, 
> Dutch...).
>
> This does not "explain" OST. It allows for an "experience" for those 
> that set up an OST event (usually 3 or a few more, depending on the 
> size of the event, in Würzburg with 2000+ participants we were 12).
> Even if none of such a group know much or nothing about OST they can 
> selforganize their work in setting up the event effectively, having fun.
>
> Greetings from Berlin
> mmp
>
>
> Am 14.08.2019 um 05:07 schrieb Tony Budak via OSList:
>> 2- And share if you know about a Trello Board explaining Open Space 
>> Tech  as  in "to do, doing, done" with OST as the Board content, 
>> empty process only?
>