[OSList] Trust
John Engle
john at haitipartners.org
Sat Feb 1 08:41:54 PST 2014
Love it, Harrison!
John Engle
www.HaitiPartners.org
202-236-6532
Haiti: 3136-6495
Sent from iPhone
> On Feb 1, 2014, at 11:31 AM, "Harrison Owen" <hhowen at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Brendan said: “And in my view , all germinating from that initial transfer of trust between mentor and sponsor” Right on! I don’t think it makes a bit of difference how elegantly one “does” the Open Space. It is really all about TRUST. When I said that anybody with a good heart and good mind can “do it,” that is just a long winded way of saying what I’ve always found to be true. Expertise is interesting. Integrity and Trust are essential. A new comer to the OS world, opening space for the very first time, muffing some lines, and forgetting others – can do every bit as well as a 20 year veteran. The coin of the realm is Integrity, authenticity, trust. But none of that should be news, for that trio is the bedrock of all positive human encounter, I think. Which may just be another way of pointing out that OS is not some special process we do, it is just life lived well. Or something.
>
> ho
>
>
> Harrison Owen
> 7808 River Falls Dr.
> Potomac, MD 20854
> USA
>
> 189 Beaucaire Ave. (summer)
> Camden, Maine 04843
>
> Phone 301-365-2093
> (summer) 207-763-3261
>
> www.openspaceworld.com
> www.ho-image.com (Personal Website)
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of OSLIST Go to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>
> From: oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org] On Behalf Of Brendan McKeague
> Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 12:57 AM
> To: World wide Open Space Technology email list
> Subject: Re: [OSList] Sponsor PreWork Conversation (long)
>
> A very interesting question Chuni Li...
>
> The sponsor was being mentored by one of my colleagues in our local Open Space community of practice (Wave Riders) who suggested to him that OS was the right method/model for the task at hand. As his coach (the formal role as perceived by the organisation), my colleague encouraged the sponsor to get in touch with me to avoid any perceived conflict of interest. The sponsor researched OS for himself first and then engaged me to provide the specialist knowledge....Harrison often says that anyone with a good heart and head can open space - and I agree - while at the same time, I acknowledge that 'Open Space wisdom' is often helpful, if not necessary, in situations of increased complexity and potential conflict.
>
> After his initial attraction to OS in theory, and as part of his research, the sponsor then ran a mini Open Space within his own jurisdiction to see how it worked in reality - he wished to speak from his lived experience when engaging with his higher-uppers. He also watched a few of the growing library of YouTube clips that are so wonderful for educating potential sponsors.
>
> Now totally convinced, the transfer of trust was complete at various levels....trusting the process (OST works) AND trusting the facilitator (who was aligned with the essence of OST - i.e living in it) AND trusting that both facilitator and process were 'fit-for-purpose' in this context.
>
> And in my view , all germinating from that initial transfer of trust between mentor and sponsor
>
> Hope this story helps
>
> Cheers Brendan
>
>
>
> On 31/01/2014, at 1:10 PM, chunili2000 at yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
> Thank you Brendan for taking the time to organize and share this information - so precious and such a generous gift!
>
> I am curious about the sponsor who "put his neck out" to make the event happen.
> Had he experienced OST before? Did you have to "convince" him? What made him willing to "jump through the hoops?" Was it the OST process or was it you that he trusted?
>
> Chuni Li
> New Jersey
>
> From: Brendan McKeague <mckeaguebrendan at gmail.com>
> To: World wide Open Space Technology email list <oslist at lists.openspacetech.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 9:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [OSList] Sponsor PreWork Conversation (long)
>
> You're very welcome Tricia - this List continues to live the invitation issued by Harrison all those years ago - to share what we learn...
>
> An addendum to the story is that the sponsor is now preparing to host mini Open Space meetings on the key themes that have emerged from the Book of Proceedings. This is very much within his own responsibility range so no convincing or permissions now required. And some of the 'higher-uppers' who attended the event were very impressed by what happened that they will carry this positive story back to the State Committee as evidence. 'Whatever happens is the only thing....'
>
> I continue to be guided and sustained by Margaret Wheatley's invitation to activists to 'let go of the need to make a difference'....
>
> and it seems to me, that when I don't NEED to make a difference, and engage from another place within me, that is when I do!
>
> Ah the paradox of it all....
>
> Cheers Brendan
>
>
>
> On 31/01/2014, at 4:31 AM, Tricia Chirumbole wrote:
>
>
> Thanks so much Brendan for taking the time to share this! I have saved your information for my own training and I am likely to plagiarize at some point :)
>
> Tricia Chirumbole
> US: +1-571-232-0942
> Skype: tricia.chirumbole
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Diane Gibeault <diane.gibeault at rogers.com> wrote:
> Well said Brendan! These are the kind of questions people new to OS who plan on offering, organizing or facilitating an event, want to be ready to answer. Thank you for that brief and effective way of sharing your informative answers.
>
> Diane
>
> From: Brendan McKeague <mckeaguebrendan at gmail.com>
> To: OS Listserve <oslist at lists.openspacetech.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 12:32:33 AM
> Subject: [OSList] Sponsor PreWork Conversation (long)
>
> Hi folks
>
> I've recently completed a one-day OST meeting with around 150 participants. It went very well and the sponsor was delighted (and much relieved) as he had 'put his neck out' with his 'higher-uppers' all along the way in order to have the event in the first place. One of the hoops he had to jump through beforehand was to to present a business case and justification for using OST in this context....I've recorded some of the email conversation that we've had as we progressed the discernment towards decision - over about three months. I thought some co-learners might be interested in parts of the to-ing and fro-ing dialogue - and would love to hear your comments around the questions this first-time user of OST is asking....or rather, being compelled to ask.
>
> Cheers
> Brendan
>
>
> Q: Does OST work with bigger numbers - the work shop will be large with an estimated 150+ diverse state and local government, industry, NGO and possibly some citizens attending.
> R: Open Space Technology (OST) is applicable regardless of numbers and diversity - indeed, we often find that the more stakeholder complexity, the better it works. I have worked with up to 350 participants and colleagues elsewhere with over 2000.
>
> The workshop is part of the finalisation of the Draft Strategic Plan and is being held to respond to the various propositions and issues raised in the public comment phase early this year. I have very briefly outlined the draft objectives and role of the selected facilitator below:
>
> Objective:
> The Strategic Plan is a new format for xxxxxx planning that challenges the current status quo of planning. Further consultation is required to provide a greater level of understanding of the ‘systems’ concept, and seek input on content and implementation issues. Main objectives include:
>
> · To build a collaborative environment ;
> R: OST certainly creates the opportunity for this - with the benefit of no predetermined agenda, all participants are invited to collaborate in co-creating the agenda around what's really important to them.
>
> · provide a greater understanding of the legislation impetus;
> R: OST allows participants to diverge and engage with others who have similar questions/issues in order to clarify understandings and pursue ideas that matter to them
>
> · genuine input and actions to assist in the finalisation of the Strategic Plan
>
> R: OST invites those who wish to contribute according to interest (passion) and responsibility - and then to offer to be part of ongoing actions beyond the event itself
>
> Main role for Facilitator:
>
> · Organisation of 150 stakeholders – some groups will be considered high risk.
> R: In OST, the participants self-organise and self-manage around what they care about - its a marvellous, fluid way to enable genuine/transparent
> collaboration, participation, inclusivity and emergence - thereby diminishing the likelihood of distraction by the disgruntled or a hi-jacking by the heavies
>
> · Creating a strategic, dynamic and collaborative process in and out of the workshop
> R: OST is a world-leading technology for this type of process
>
> . memorable, positive, inspiring – has to have the same takeaway as previous (Deliberative Democracy) forum i.e. participation was worthy of time, feel inspired, have made a difference -
> R: no process (or facilitator) in the world can guarantee these outcomes - unfortunately for me! OST can create the space where they are most likely to show up, provided that the sponsors have done their preparation properly - i.e. asked the right question, issued the right invitation, created the right space....then, the folks who care to show up in response do the rest by themselves. The power of a great OST mtg comes from the release of passionate energy when people are given the freedom to do what they really care about
>
> · Participants must go home with a greater more positive understanding (including impetus for use) of the SPS and systems thinking
> R: its very difficult to enforce the 'must go home with' aspiration when working with a group of mature (and diverse) adults. I can however say, from my experience of facilitating over 250 OST mtgs around the country in the last 15 years, that OST does provide everyone with the opportunity to participate at the level they chose, to ask the questions they bring with them, to engage with others who care about similar issues, to record their conversations, to contribute to action outcomes and to learn more about the topic about which they're meeting. And in all of that, they usually have a lot of fun too!
>
>
> · Defining clear objectives and parameter of discussion
> R: Once again, this is the work of the sponsors beforehand - we call these 'the givens' that form part of the invitation in OST - the container in which 'the space is open' - then let the people get to work around what they came to do
>
>
> · Day round up
> R: OST usually finishes with a Closing Circle for comments from participants and sponsors
>
> Dear Brendan,
>
> In an attempt to manage stakeholders expectations and ensure effective facilitation of diverse ~150 stakeholders within the broad scope (theme: Making the Planning Strategy a Success) , could you please kindly advise based on the desired outcomes (below) as to whether any other facilitation method would achieve the same outcomes as Open Space Technology (OST).
>
> · Time and labour efficient
> R: I know of no other process that will get 150 people working on what they want to work on together as quickly as OST; with the opening explanation and agenda creation taking about 45-50mins, the whole 150 participants can get down to work quickly on issues that are important to them.
>
> · Memorable and inspiring
> R: This is a product of participation on the day. The participants will create their own agenda around what's important to them and so they are invited to take responsibility for what they offer and engage with i.e. if it is not memorable and inspiring, then it may be that they have not responded fully to the invitation and they are in the wrong place - they can use the Law of Mobility to move elsewhere - or even leave if what's on offer is not why they came. Hence the importance of creating a clear, transparent and irresistible invitation for those who wish to make this Strategy a success. It is extremely important for the Sponsors to be familiar with, and endorse, the guarantees of an OST meeting - see attached explanation.
>
> · collaborative
> R: There are many levels of collaboration. Mature collaboration is about engaging with others - who may have very similar or very different views- and taking time to listen well, to speak truthfully about issues that are important and to be open to what emerges. Lesser forms/models of collaboration adopt coercion, compliance and competition as a container for obtaining predetermined desired outcomes. OST provides a container for self-organising around what is identified as important by those who wish to (or even, 'have to') do something about implementing this strategy. The OST process models the intention of seeking more mature collaboration around complex issues involving multiple stakeholders.
>
> · Enables strategic thinking
> R: The Planning Strategy has been developed - i.e. the diagnostics have been completed - based on various previous consultations. Now is the time for moving into implementation and operationalising the outcomes. This requires a dialogical process - where those responsible for implementation have opportunities to interpret, clarify, be creative, innovative and consider how they are going to do this within their own circles of influence. As I understand it, it's exploratory and open - there is not one uniform way of making this work successfully - it there is, then OST is not needed - people are told what to do and resourced to do it. OST provides space for creativity, diverse views and novel ideas to be named and explored. This cannot be legislated in advance - it needs to emerge from the confluence of energy, knowledge, skills, experiences and potentially contentious views of those who show up. OST is the most transparent process for this, with inbuilt principles of self-determination that enable high levels of passionate energy, high levels of learning and high levels of 'fun' to show up on the day.
>
> · Rapid consensus
> R: This is another question entirely. In a one-day meeting of 150 diverse stakeholders, what are you seeking 'rapid consensus' on?
> I would need to hear more from you about your purpose and intentions here. In my experience, when consensus is an expectation in such a short time-frame with so many people, there are too often 'winners and losers' and people can easily get bogged down in detail around language interpretation, aggressive defensiveness and even destructive competition to try to force a neat outcome. There are other, often more appropriate, ways of creating and sustaining alignment with the Strategy into the future (e.g. by creating and supporting 'communities of practice' around key themes emerging from the OST meeting)
>
>
> R: Thanks for asking these key clarifying questions. I realise how important this conference is in terms of creating a platform for implementation of the Planning Strategy. I agree that the process on the day needs to be the best match for your purpose.
>
> I have inserted a few comments and attached a brief 2 page explanation of OST and its 'guarantees'.
>
> In a nutshell, OST is not driven by 'predetermined outcomes' (my words) - it is about creating space for engagement and emergence with those who will be doing the work of implementation. It is a self-organising dialogical process that, in my opinion, is most suitable for this stage of your Planning Strategy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20140201/68dba9b2/attachment-0008.htm>
More information about the OSList
mailing list