[OSList] The Mind Map in the Planning Meeting

[Michael M Pannwitz]

Dear Hege,
the mind map phase simply allows everyone who cares to share around a 
specific day (the day after from which you look back at the os event) 
what they think/feel/enivision that has changed, is different, new 
perspectives and what is happening on the day after the event.
In doing so everyone also gets a glimpse, a notion, an impression of 
what aspirations, hopes, visions, dreams etc are present in the group.
This whole phase takes less than 20 minutes.
In the next phase, participants individually offer a "heading" for the 
event. After having done that and everybody having heard the lets say 15 
different "headings" they break up into 5 groups of three (randomly)with 
the task that each trio finds its own heading.
These 5 headings are shared and weighed (not voted on).
Against all this background, they take a break.
After the break, they go into a fishbowl phase where three volunteers 
have the task to come up with THE heading for the event they are 
planning in the presence of the whole group with a structured way for 
the group that is "watching" to paricipate.
After they have arrived at THE heading they share their ideas on who all 
needs to be at the event to reach the things they put down in the 
mindmap under the heading they found. After that its Nuts and Bolts and 
a closing circle reflecting on the last 3,5 hours....

More precisely to your questions
1. In my experience the results of the Planning Meeting via all the 
stuff they do for 3,5 hours is entirely sufficient... however, it will 
keep emerging continuously und even during the OST event itself...the 
mind map pretty close to the beginning of the Planning Meeting is just 
the beginning of getting a better grip on what the common ground is on 
the Theme
2. If the OST gathering is not yet precisely set but it is clear that it 
actually will happen, the Planning Meeting makes sense and will work 
with all the parts contained in it. Before the Planning Meeting I have a 
contract to facilitate the event and, in my practice, the first part of 
my fee (25%) has been paid before the Planning Meeting (the second 25% 
is due after the Planning Meeting and the last 50% after the event 
itself with possible Next Meetings included). Actually, the decision to 
have the meeting usually is taken quite a bit ahead of the Planning 
Meeting, shortly after the Contact Meeting (where the sponsor decides 
whether all the prerequisites are in place for an OST meeting... for the 
Contact Meeting I dont charge a fee).
Now, I am aware of the fact, that sometimes my relationship with a 
sponsor is not by my book (the name of my book is "Meine open space 
Praxis, if you read German, I recommend it, of course... it also has 
100+ color pictures which many have found useful in following the 
process). However, this is rare. Mostly, because I know that skipping 
any of the steps (Contact always occurs, of course, but the need for a 
Contact Meeting and a Planning Meeting and some other things I insist on 
such as taking a look at the space before the event) means trouble 
ahead. When the stuff a sponsor has to deal with is so hot that the 
event should take place immediately it can happen that on the night 
before the event the Planning Meeting takes place...which is also 
possible with all the participants of the event...it always requires 3,5 
hours, regardless of the number of participants...from the design you 
can see that the phase "Who should be at the event..." can only be dealt 
with in a very limited way, since all that will participate already were 
invited in some way and are already present... except for those that 
come to the conclusion after the Planning Meeting that this is not the 
event they enivisionde it to be and leave.
3. People coming to the Planning Meeting need to know nothing about OST, 
which is also true for everyone coming to the event itself (that has led 
to invitations that say extremely little about OST and only some of the 
stuff that happens such as that the agenda will be created by the 
participants themselves and worked on in break out sessions that are 
selforganized...)

My most central experience with the entire planning process (everything 
that happens with the sponsor and the Planning Group that was invited by 
the sponsor and of which the sponsor is part of) is not that they came 
up with a grand mindmap or a terrific theme or a perfect list of who all 
should come but that they transformed from a number of people who came 
for various reasons to the meeting into a "larger sponsor", an 
effectively collaborating group to deal with the many tasks between the 
Planning Meeting and the OST event and a powerful advocate for the event.
Some of the remarks in the 5-Minute closing circle under the heading of 
"How was it, what did I experience in this meeting?" were
---I have worked as a manager for 30 years and must have been to 
thousands of meetings, this one has been the most productive I have been 
to and it was fun
---I have been to many meetings that made little sense to me and in 
which I could not really participate, this is the first meeting that got 
me so excited and involved that I actually spoke up and agreed to work 
with the trio that will design the final invitation tomorrow
---When I came here this morning I was tired and had no real clue what 
would happen, now I am refreshed and have a good picture of the event we 
planned and can talk about it to others
---I came just to listen and see what others would say but when I had to 
complete the sentence in the beginning "I am here today, to..." I knew 
it was going to be different, usually I am asked in an introduction 
"why" I am here
---After this meeting I can go out and invite people and actually tell 
them what it will be about
---Looking forward to come to the conference we have planned
---We achieved a lot, time flew and it was fun

So, what is the purpose of the Planning Meeting?
I like the way that Eiwor put it:
"...often feel that the planning meeting is where the space is really 
opened. The rest is ritual."

Considering not only the impact the Planning Meeting has and the clarity 
and direction it brings to the group and the quantum jump from various 
levels of interest to a lively selforganized group taking charge but 
also the assistance I as facilitator get from such a group in being more 
able to hold space (be utterly present and completely invisible) 
suggests I would be crazy not to insist on a Planning Meeting

Greetings from Berlin
mmp

On 12.06.2013 11:01, Hege Steinsland wrote:
> Thank you Michael for such a rich answer. It`s great that you so
> willingly share your experience.
>
> What confuses me a bit is that I keep hearing its so important in the
> prework to make sure that OS is the right tool at the time, and that
> the conditions  are right. Its also important to be clear about the
> purpose. So I suppose I feel I have to be open to the possibility
> that we will conclude OS is not what we want to do... and to make the
> group say something about the purpose as well.
>
> So I guess I have three questions: In your experience - is it not
> necessary to clear the purpose more than what the mindmap covers
> according to vision and goals? and Would the mindmap work even when
> the concrete meeting is not set, that is actually going to happen
> during the meeting itself?
>
> Do people need to know anything at all about OS to do this mindmap?
>
> All the best, and thanks from Hege 11. juni 2013 kl. 22:39 skrev
> Michael M Pannwitz <mmpannwitz at gmail.com>:
>
>> Dear Hege, thanks for your question on the design of the mind map.
>>
>> Before addressing your specific question I talk a bit more about
>> the entire Planning Meeting design assuming that this will also
>> show more clearly the purpose of the mind map phase itself. Also, I
>> want to point out that as we kept experiencing Planning Meetings we
>> continuously worked on the design for more than a decade now and
>> learnt more about some of the theoretical background on why some
>> things were important and how to improve on them. All the time, I
>> am aware that the Planning Meeting is not an OST event... it does,
>> however, allow for many opportuninities to "remember" open space,
>> get an inkling, without this being pointed out in any manner, of
>> the principles, the Law, the Admonition, the force of
>> selforganisation... and some other things as for instance the
>> Differentiation/Integration theory (D/I Theory...in German
>> Aufgliedern/Zusammenfügen, A/Z Theorie) that I was introduced to by
>> Marvin Weisbord/Sandra Janoff (they deal with this in great detail
>> in "Don't Just Do Something, Stand There!" which is also available
>> in a German translation which I gave the title "Einfach mal Nichts
>> tun!" ... a great read for folks in the facilitation mode).
>>
>> Ok, here a bit of the Planning Meeting design:
>>
>> The Planning Meeting starts with a break, about 15 Minutes, in
>> which people chat, partake from the neverending lush buffet, have a
>> look at the list of participants that is posted... and finally
>> follow the lead of the sponsor and me as we sit down in the
>> circle.
>>
>> After each member of the Planning Group has introduced himself
>> (this is the first thing they do, sitting in a circle, after the
>> very brief welcome by the sponsor,  responding very briefly to
>> three things I have written on a large poster: My name is... / I
>> work as..at... / Now I'm here to...)
>>
>> (This takes about 12 seconds per participant, so with a group of 15
>> no more than 3 to 4 minutes BUT it is a very important 3 to 4
>> minutes in which everyone speaks, is heard and seen, gives some
>> very simple information which requires not a great deal of
>> reflection AND its the first opportunity to work with the D/I
>> theory: every time a group differentiates, in this case with 15
>> participants into 15 "subgroups" that instantaneously "integrate"
>> in the whole group of 15 the group "focuses" on itself and its
>> resources and improves its capability for collaboration...)
>>
>> I ask them to get up and move the chairs into a half-circle so they
>> all face the work-surfaces also set up in a half circle (this is
>> the second time they do something themselves, actually rearranging
>> the geometry of the seating design... they do form a circle again
>> at the end of the Planning Meeting for the closing circle, facing
>> each other again).
>>
>> (As we started working with Planning Meetings we did have everyone
>> sit in a half circle, me standing next to the poster with the three
>> questions. This seemed to work well until one day a participant,
>> who had not answered the 3 questions came up to me in the break
>> later on in the meeting, saying. "I was not going to follow your
>> instruction as I was sitting in front of you and you were there as
>> the teacher directing me to do something." This was a grand
>> feedback which got us to start with a circle with me sitting in it,
>> too - why had we not seen that from the beginning? - even though it
>> exists only for a few minutes and is then rearranged, luckily
>> allowing for an experience of the group of actually doing something
>> for a few minutes at the very beginning of the meeting which is
>> always accompanied by laughter, smiles, chatter)
>>
>> After they have arranged the chairs in a half-circle and sit down I
>> go through the Planning Meeting design asking at the end whether
>> the design is ok for them. I do point out that if anyone has to
>> leave before the end of the meeting that they just do that (The
>> Law).
>>
>> After that, I uncover the mindmap and see to it that it is in the
>> center of the work surface that the group is facing (the work
>> surface usually consists of 3 to 5 pinwalls)... the poster with the
>> design moves to the edge of the work surface always visible for
>> everyone.
>>
>> Now to your question: I prepared the mind map poster (it is usually
>> two large A1 flipchart papers pasted together and mounted on a
>> pinwall) ahead of the meeting with the typical little cloud in the
>> center of the mind map showing the date of the first workday after
>> the event, for instance "Monday, September 16, 2013" I step up to
>> the mind map saying something like this: "I invite you to go on a
>> journey to the day after the event you are planning in September,
>> this will be Monday, September 16. From this day in the future you
>> look back on the event that took place in the previous three days.
>> You might be at work, in your office... wherever... imagine what is
>> happening now, what is different, what perspectives have opened up
>> for you, your project, your group, your community? If something
>> comes to your mind that you care to share, you step up, grab this
>> marker (I am holding it in my hand), draw a line from the center (I
>> draw a line, just that, no words) and use a few words to write it
>> on the line and say it out loud to the group and then return to
>> your chair. Now I stand next to the mind map, holding up the
>> marker, ready to let the fist person that comes up, grab it. From
>> this point onward I say nothing... true to "Dont just do something,
>> stand there"... it usually takes not more than 20 seconds before
>> the first person comes up, grabs the marker, writes something on
>> the line, repeats it out loud to the group, puts the marker on the
>> stool next to the mind map where I placed a small box with other
>> markers (black, blue, green and red marker) or, sometimes, stands
>> as I did holding the marker waiting for the next person to step
>> up.
>>
>> (In the beginning I used to write things on the mindmap until,
>> happily, I facilitated a Planning Meeting in English for Ukrainians
>> where most did understand English and could follow the few things I
>> said but could not express stuff well in English, so I soon gave up
>> and asked them to write their things on the mind map in their
>> mother tongue themselves... what a relief. They not only got up,
>> moved to the mind map, touched it and put their thoughts on it but
>> also connected theirs with other strings or expanded on other
>> strings by adding stuff. It was clear this would be the way to go
>> in from there on.)
>>
>> As the mind map expands, people who already put something up, get
>> up again expanding on their original input or expanding on the
>> input of others or adding a new string... often intentionally using
>> certain colors, adding symbols, connecting things. Each mindmap I
>> have seen is unique and always immediately identifiable by group
>> members as theirs. As things ebb I ask "Is it over?", sometimes it
>> is, sometimes a few more things go up. In all, it takes between 12
>> and 18 minutes, pretty independent of the size of the Planning
>> Group. After the mind map is finished I do three more things.
>> First, I point out that though the mindmap is a two-dimensional
>> picture of what the situation will be on the day after the event
>> they will probably also see more dimensions reflecting their
>> aspirations, dreams, visions, hopes, believes... secondly, I say
>> that the mindmap will be in the room for the entire meeting for
>> them to consult in the following steps of the Planning meeting and
>> can be expanded on any time and thirdly I move into the "My Theme"
>> phase.
>>
>> (Further Phases are "Our Theme", "Who all needs to be at the
>> conference", "Nuts and Bolts" and the closing circle under the
>> heading "How was it today?").
>>
>> Greetings from Berlin mmp
>>
>> On 01.06.2013 19:15, Hege Steinsland wrote:
>>> Michael - I would love to see how you design the mindmap? Do you
>>> just write the question in the middel and let people write out
>>> from that, or do you do something more than that?
>>>
>>> Hege
>>>
>>> 31. mai 2013 kl. 18:16 skrev Michael M Pannwitz
>>> <mmpannwitz at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Dear Patricio, the "Day after" contributions are collected by
>>>> the participants themselves on a poster-sized (A1) mind map...
>>>> everyone who wants to add something to the mindmap gets up,
>>>> walks to the poster and puts it there in his/her own writing or
>>>> expands on a strand of the mind map... pretty independent of
>>>> the size of the group this takes 12 to 18 minutes. This happens
>>>> very close after the beginning of the Planning Meeting and is
>>>> the first "self-organized" step (I just stand next to the mind
>>>> map holding a felt tipped marker... if no body steps up the
>>>> Planning Meeting shuts down, well, to tell the truth, this has
>>>> never happened).
>>>>
>>>> The neat thing about this mind map is that the sponsor or
>>>> whoever is in charge for documentation rolls up the mind map
>>>> (and the other documents that are created) and posts it again
>>>> at the review meeting of the Planning Group shortly after the
>>>> event. On the average, somewhat rough, 85% of the stuff that
>>>> went onto the mind map (aspirations, descriptions of the
>>>> future, perspectives...) are considered by the Planning Group
>>>> to have actually been actualized. Not any other approach I know
>>>> of that has such a record.
>>>>
>>>> Aside from it being used for "evaluation", the mind map is
>>>> also posted again at the "Next Meetings" of which there is at
>>>> least one about 10 weeks after the event (this Next Meeting is
>>>> already announced with date and time and place in the initial
>>>> invitation to the event that the Planning Group created). Its a
>>>> very quick way to find ones way back to the event... all that
>>>> is required is that it is posted at the Next Meeting(s), no
>>>> need to comment or speak on it.
>>>>
>>>> On another level, the mind map action leaves a deep imprint
>>>> (not that I had envisioned this but it showed up in working
>>>> with it): members of the group wanting to contribute to the
>>>> mind map STAND UP... WALK FROM THEIR CHAIR TO THE MIND MAP...
>>>> TOUCH IT AND WRITE ON IT PERSONALLY... AND WALK BACK TO THEIR
>>>> CHAIR (sometimes taking a little detour via the buffet to get
>>>> coffee or an apple, after all, this was exhausting). In other
>>>> words, its the first step in taking physical ownership of whats
>>>> happening... a foretaste of open space (mind you, the Planning
>>>> Meeting is not an os event, its a step by step structured and
>>>> guided event with the "little" difference that nothing happens
>>>> at the Planning Meeting that the participants dont do
>>>> themselves... this has its dark side: They actually are
>>>> planning their own event and if the sponsor is not properly
>>>> briefed that they WILL do this and assume leadership and that
>>>> he needs to understand this, big problems might appear).
>>>>
>>>> Have a great day mmp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 31.05.2013 14:27, Patricio Bastian wrote:
>>>>> Dear Elder,
>>>>>
>>>>> to helpanswer yourconcern.............“I specially like your
>>>>> starting looking to the Day After....What is happening the
>>>>> day after the event? Which perspectives do I see now? What
>>>>> has changed? This, I´ll try next time, yes! “
>>>>>
>>>>> I mentionthat I'm developing my dissertation with that
>>>>> question.
>>>>>
>>>>> I enclose the approach:
>>>>>
>>>>> *Problem Formulation*
>>>>>
>>>>> The general question asks whether the Open Space is an
>>>>> effective technique to produce sustainable organizational
>>>>> change and if it is superior to other organizational
>>>>> intervention techniques, which are based on smaller groups
>>>>> and a highly structured setting with a view of the
>>>>> objectives. This question can generally be divided into the
>>>>> following questions:
>>>>>
>>>>> • Are individuals able to self-organize when subjected to an
>>>>> unstructured context? • Open Space Is capable of producing
>>>>> organizational responses that the Organization needs? • Do
>>>>> organizational change (to have occurred) sustainable over
>>>>> time? • Do on these indicators than traditional techniques in
>>>>> terms of efficiency and effectiveness?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Research Objectives
>>>>>
>>>>> General Purpose*
>>>>>
>>>>> Evaluate the effectiveness of the technique of Open Space,
>>>>> representing intervention techniques in large groups, to
>>>>> produce an organizational change that accounts for internal
>>>>> and external demands of the Organization.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Specific Objectives*
>>>>>
>>>>> • Analyze the operation of the Open Space and organizational
>>>>> skill. • Measure and analyze the impact that technology has
>>>>> on the organization. • Compare the Open Space with other
>>>>> organizational intervention technique. • Contribute empirical
>>>>> and theoretical analysis of intervention techniques in large
>>>>> groups.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, I appreciate your comments to the discussion in
>>>>> my thesis. Your input is a valuable aid.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you, thank you very much.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> *Patricio Bastian Duarte*
>>>>>
>>>>> **
>>>>>
>>>>> *Note: *Mynative language isSpanish. Pleaseexcusetypos
>>>>>
>>>>> *De:*oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>>> [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org] *En nombre
>>>>> de *Eleder_BuM *Enviado el:* viernes, 31 de mayo de 2013
>>>>> 5:50 *Para:* Michael M Pannwitz; World wide Open Space
>>>>> Technology email list *Asunto:* Re: [OSList] What to do when
>>>>> a conflicted and important part is missing?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Michael!
>>>>>
>>>>> I´ll say that till now, I used to hold much less detailed
>>>>> preparation meetings.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would just come, say hello, and, more or less,...
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. explain briefly OST for the ones that don´t know it: best
>>>>> conditions, how the event will go on, what the resulsts
>>>>> are,...
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. open a wide conversation to get to the core of their
>>>>> invitation. Then I would write a draft and fix it with the
>>>>> core group during the days after.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. Spend dome time thinking on the invitation process:
>>>>> who&hows,...
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. speak about all the logistics, place, food, materials,
>>>>> helped by a mind-map in which I have organized all this info
>>>>>
>>>>> And it has worked ok so far.
>>>>>
>>>>> Knowing that your more detailed and paused focus worked
>>>>> hundred of times makes me open to try (some part of) it next
>>>>> time.
>>>>>
>>>>> I specially like your starting looking to the Day
>>>>> After....What is happening the day after the event? Which
>>>>> perspectives do I see now? What has changed? This, I´ll try
>>>>> next time, yes!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It´s weird for me, anyway, to spend a 10:00-16:00 time slot
>>>>> in the preparation,... and it really makes sense, the
>>>>> sponsors and the facilitator start opening space in a calm
>>>>> and passionate way from the preparation meeting!
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks so much for your wise advice and rich information
>>>>> pieces,
>>>>>
>>>>> best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Eleder
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/5/30 Michael M Pannwitz <mmpannwitz at gmail.com
>>>>> <mailto:mmpannwitz at gmail.com>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Eleder, the core idea of the planning meeting is that
>>>>> its not me as facilitator to do stuff that the sponsor of the
>>>>> event (and his planning group) can do themselves. So the
>>>>> first step is to find out who the sponsor is. This might
>>>>> sound silly, but in real life it is often surprising that it
>>>>> is not clear at all. If you find, that you yourself are the
>>>>> sponsor you can stop worrying and find a facilitator for your
>>>>> event. If you know you are not the sponsor and know who the
>>>>> sponsor is, tell him/her that, after it is clear it is going
>>>>> to be an event using OST (which means the prerequisites are
>>>>> in place, this must not be clear to you but the sponsor needs
>>>>> to find out), that a planning group needs to gather. This
>>>>> group should in some way mirror the
>>>>> organisation/community/group that is expected to gather in
>>>>> the open space event. Usually, the planning group consists of
>>>>> 5 to 20 people. They need to be invited by the sponsor to the
>>>>> planning meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, here is the design of the planning meeting which takes
>>>>> 3,5 hours either before lunch or later in the morning with
>>>>> lunch as a break or in the afternoon or early evening...
>>>>> preferrably in the space in which the os also is planned
>>>>>
>>>>> 10:00   Break, Arriving, Coffee …..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 10:30   Welcome by the sponsor who introduces the facilitator
>>>>> for the following steps
>>>>>
>>>>> Introducing ourselves   All Introducing the agenda
>>>>> Facilitator
>>>>>
>>>>> 10:45   The Day After What is happening on "Monday, June 17,
>>>>> 2013, the day after the event? Which perspectives do I see
>>>>> now? What has changed?
>>>>>
>>>>> The group itself creates a Mindmap with their
>>>>> thoughts/inputs
>>>>>
>>>>> 11:15   My Theme for the Open Space event Individually 3
>>>>> minutes, All announce their themes               2 minutes,
>>>>> Work in subgroups                       15 minutes Reporting
>>>>> to the whole group            5 minutes Weighing the Themes
>>>>> 10 minutes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Break beginning at noon Time for a look at the large meeting
>>>>> room and lunch
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2:00    Our Theme / provisional Characteristics of an
>>>>> action-orienting theme…. A small group (3 to 5) of volunteers
>>>>> sit in front of the entire group and designs the theme for
>>>>> the meeting,  provide an extra chair for inputs from the
>>>>> large group, fish-bowl style.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2:45    Who all needs to be at the conference? So that the
>>>>> expectations expressed for the day after under the chosen
>>>>> theme will actually be met Brainstorm, identify participants
>>>>> essential for the process Check the Theme, still ok?
>>>>>
>>>>> 3:15 Nuts and Bolts Collect things to do Who will take care
>>>>> of what?
>>>>>
>>>>> 3:45 How was it today
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 4:00 End
>>>>>
>>>>> This design has been used hundreds of times and works with
>>>>> any group, even teachers, lawyers, scientists and mixtures of
>>>>> them and especially well with children and in neighborhood
>>>>> groups in all cultures around the globe.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will seperately send you a pdf documentation with pictures
>>>>> of a planning meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings from Berlin mmp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 30.05.2013 16:56, Eleder_BuM wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael, you say,... /"if they in fact meet and follow the
>>>>> simple design I have described on this list."/ / /could you
>>>>> tell us more about  this design?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks so much for your attention,
>>>>>
>>>>> Eleder
>>>>>
>>>>> ____
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________ OSList
>>>>> mailing list To post send emails to
>>>>> OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>>> <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org> To unsubscribe send
>>>>> an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>>>>> <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org> To subscribe
>>>>> or manage your subscription click below:
>>>>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>> OSList mailing list To post send emails to
>>>>> OSList at lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email
>>>>> to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or
>>>>> manage your subscription click below:
>>>>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>>
--
>>>> Michael M Pannwitz Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany ++49 -
>>>> 30-772 8000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 410
>>>> resident Open Space Workers in 72 countries working in a total
>>>> of 143 countries worldwide: www.openspaceworldmap.org
>>>> _______________________________________________ OSList mailing
>>>> list To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org To
>>>> unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage
>>>> your subscription click below:
>>>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>>>
--
>>>>
>> Michael M Pannwitz Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany ++49 - 30-772
>> 8000
>>
>>
>>
>> Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 411 resident
>> Open Space Workers in 72 countries working in a total of 143
>> countries worldwide: www.openspaceworldmap.org
>>
>> -- Michael M Pannwitz Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany ++49 -
>> 30-772 8000
>>
>>
>>
>> Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 411 resident
>> Open Space Workers in 72 countries working in a total of 143
>> countries worldwide: www.openspaceworldmap.org
>

-- 
Michael M Pannwitz
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
++49 - 30-772 8000



Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 411 resident Open 
Space Workers in 72 countries working in a total of 143 countries 
worldwide: www.openspaceworldmap.org