[OSList] Hong Kong June 13 or 14: who likes to meet?

Michael M Pannwitz mmpannwitz at gmail.com
Tue Jun 4 08:23:01 PDT 2013


Dear Gail,
will not be in HongKong or in Taipei
but
I am always interested in Great Surprises!

Greetings from Berlin where we will have our next Stammtisch on July 
1... so drop by if in town!!

mmp

On 04.06.2013 15:27, Gail West wrote:
> Hi Gijs,
>
> Sorry I won't be in Hong Kong.  Would love to see you and have a good
> visit and catch up!
>
> We're having our monthly OS Learning Exchange on this Saturday in
> Taipei.  Why not drop by here before your Hong Kong committments ?  We
> have great surprises here as well
>
> Gail
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Gijs Mega <gijs at megainternational.com.hk
> <mailto:gijs at megainternational.com.hk>> wrote:
>
>     Hi everyone,
>
>     I am planning to be in Hong Kong next week Thursday/Friday and
>     "prepared to be surprised".
>     Is anyone around for a casual talk or does anyone have a suggestion
>     .....?
>
>     Hope you are all well,
>
>     Best wishes,
>     Gijs
>
>
>                                          Gijs van Wezel, Facilitator
>     Inspirational Business Group Meetings at lake side, 1 hr from
>     shanghai city
>     www.megainternational.com.hk <http://www.megainternational.com.hk>
>
>
>     On Jun 2, 2013, at 1:15 AM, Hege Steinsland
>     <steinslandhege at gmail.com <mailto:steinslandhege at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>      > Michael - I would love to see how you design the mindmap?
>      > Do you just write the question in the middel and let people write
>     out from that, or do you do something more than that?
>      >
>      > Hege
>      >
>      > 31. mai 2013 kl. 18:16 skrev Michael M Pannwitz
>     <mmpannwitz at gmail.com <mailto:mmpannwitz at gmail.com>>:
>      >
>      >> Dear Patricio,
>      >> the "Day after" contributions are collected by the participants
>     themselves on a poster-sized (A1) mind map... everyone who wants to
>     add something to the mindmap gets up, walks to the poster and puts
>     it there in his/her own writing or expands on a strand of the mind
>     map... pretty independent of the size of the group this takes 12 to
>     18 minutes. This happens very close after the beginning of the
>     Planning Meeting and is the first "self-organized" step (I just
>     stand next to the mind map holding a felt tipped marker... if no
>     body steps up the Planning Meeting shuts down, well, to tell the
>     truth, this has never happened).
>      >>
>      >> The neat thing about this mind map is that the sponsor or
>     whoever is in charge for documentation rolls up the mind map (and
>     the other documents that are created) and posts it again at the
>     review meeting of the Planning Group shortly after the event. On the
>     average, somewhat rough, 85% of the stuff that went onto the mind
>     map (aspirations, descriptions of the future, perspectives...) are
>     considered by the Planning Group to have actually been actualized.
>     Not any other approach I know of that has such a record.
>      >>
>      >> Aside from it being used for "evaluation", the mind map is also
>     posted again at the "Next Meetings" of which there is at least one
>     about 10 weeks after the event (this Next Meeting is already
>     announced with date and time and place in the initial invitation to
>     the event that the Planning Group created). Its a very quick way to
>     find ones way back to the event... all that is required is that it
>     is posted at the Next Meeting(s), no need to comment or speak on it.
>      >>
>      >> On another level, the mind map action leaves a deep imprint (not
>     that I had envisioned this but it showed up in working with it):
>     members of the group wanting to contribute to the mind map STAND
>     UP... WALK FROM THEIR CHAIR TO THE MIND MAP... TOUCH IT AND WRITE ON
>     IT PERSONALLY... AND WALK BACK TO THEIR CHAIR (sometimes taking a
>     little detour via the buffet to get coffee or an apple, after all,
>     this was exhausting).
>      >> In other words, its the first step in taking physical ownership
>     of whats happening... a foretaste of open space (mind you, the
>     Planning Meeting is not an os event, its a step by step structured
>     and guided event with the "little" difference that nothing happens
>     at the Planning Meeting that the participants dont do themselves...
>     this has its dark side: They actually are planning their own event
>     and if the sponsor is not properly briefed that they WILL do this
>     and assume leadership and that he needs to understand this, big
>     problems might appear).
>      >>
>      >> Have a great day
>      >> mmp
>      >>
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> On 31.05.2013 14 <tel:31.05.2013%2014>:27, Patricio Bastian wrote:
>      >>> Dear Elder,
>      >>>
>      >>> to helpanswer yourconcern.............“I specially like your
>     starting
>      >>> looking to the Day After....What is happening the day after the
>     event?
>      >>> Which perspectives do I see now? What has changed? This, I´ll
>     try next
>      >>> time, yes! “
>      >>>
>      >>> I mentionthat I'm developing my dissertation with that question.
>      >>>
>      >>> I enclose the approach:
>      >>>
>      >>> *Problem Formulation*
>      >>>
>      >>> The general question asks whether the Open Space is an effective
>      >>> technique to produce sustainable organizational change and if it is
>      >>> superior to other organizational intervention techniques, which are
>      >>> based on smaller groups and a highly structured setting with a
>     view of
>      >>> the objectives. This question can generally be divided into the
>      >>> following questions:
>      >>>
>      >>> • Are individuals able to self-organize when subjected to an
>      >>> unstructured context?
>      >>> • Open Space Is capable of producing organizational responses
>     that the
>      >>> Organization needs?
>      >>> • Do organizational change (to have occurred) sustainable over
>     time?
>      >>> • Do on these indicators than traditional techniques in terms of
>      >>> efficiency and effectiveness?
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> *Research Objectives
>      >>>
>      >>> General Purpose*
>      >>>
>      >>> Evaluate the effectiveness of the technique of Open Space,
>     representing
>      >>> intervention techniques in large groups, to produce an
>     organizational
>      >>> change that accounts for internal and external demands of the
>     Organization.
>      >>>
>      >>> *Specific Objectives*
>      >>>
>      >>> • Analyze the operation of the Open Space and organizational skill.
>      >>> • Measure and analyze the impact that technology has on the
>     organization.
>      >>> • Compare the Open Space with other organizational intervention
>     technique.
>      >>> • Contribute empirical and theoretical analysis of intervention
>      >>> techniques in large groups.
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> Of course, I appreciate your comments to the discussion in my
>     thesis.
>      >>> Your input is a valuable aid.
>      >>>
>      >>> Thank you, thank you very much.
>      >>>
>      >>> Sincerely,
>      >>>
>      >>> *Patricio Bastian Duarte*
>      >>>
>      >>> **
>      >>>
>      >>> *Note: *Mynative language isSpanish. Pleaseexcusetypos
>      >>>
>      >>> *De:*oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org>
>      >>> [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org>] *En nombre de
>     *Eleder_BuM
>      >>> *Enviado el:* viernes, 31 de mayo de 2013 5:50
>      >>> *Para:* Michael M Pannwitz; World wide Open Space Technology
>     email list
>      >>> *Asunto:* Re: [OSList] What to do when a conflicted and
>     important part
>      >>> is missing?
>      >>>
>      >>> Hi Michael!
>      >>>
>      >>> I´ll say that till now, I used to hold much less detailed
>     preparation
>      >>> meetings.
>      >>>
>      >>> I would just come, say hello, and, more or less,...
>      >>>
>      >>> 1. explain briefly OST for the ones that don´t know it: best
>     conditions,
>      >>> how the event will go on, what the resulsts are,...
>      >>>
>      >>> 2. open a wide conversation to get to the core of their
>     invitation. Then
>      >>> I would write a draft and fix it with the core group during the
>     days after.
>      >>>
>      >>> 3. Spend dome time thinking on the invitation process: who&hows,...
>      >>>
>      >>> 4. speak about all the logistics, place, food, materials,
>     helped by a
>      >>> mind-map in which I have organized all this info
>      >>>
>      >>> And it has worked ok so far.
>      >>>
>      >>> Knowing that your more detailed and paused focus worked hundred
>     of times
>      >>> makes me open to try (some part of) it next time.
>      >>>
>      >>> I specially like your starting looking to the Day After....What is
>      >>> happening the day after the event? Which perspectives do I see
>     now? What
>      >>> has changed? This, I´ll try next time, yes!
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> It´s weird for me, anyway, to spend a 10:00-16:00 time slot in the
>      >>> preparation,... and it really makes sense, the sponsors and the
>      >>> facilitator start opening space in a calm and passionate way
>     from the
>      >>> preparation meeting!
>      >>>
>      >>> Thanks so much for your wise advice and rich information pieces,
>      >>>
>      >>> best,
>      >>>
>      >>> Eleder
>      >>>
>      >>> 2013/5/30 Michael M Pannwitz <mmpannwitz at gmail.com
>     <mailto:mmpannwitz at gmail.com>
>      >>> <mailto:mmpannwitz at gmail.com <mailto:mmpannwitz at gmail.com>>>
>      >>>
>      >>> Dear Eleder,
>      >>> the core idea of the planning meeting is that its not me as
>     facilitator
>      >>> to do stuff that the sponsor of the event (and his planning
>     group) can
>      >>> do themselves.
>      >>> So the first step is to find out who the sponsor is. This might
>     sound
>      >>> silly, but in real life it is often surprising that it is not
>     clear at all.
>      >>> If you find, that you yourself are the sponsor you can stop
>     worrying and
>      >>> find a facilitator for your event.
>      >>> If you know you are not the sponsor and know who the sponsor
>     is, tell
>      >>> him/her that, after it is clear it is going to be an event
>     using OST
>      >>> (which means the prerequisites are in place, this must not be
>     clear to
>      >>> you but the sponsor needs to find out), that a planning group
>     needs to
>      >>> gather.
>      >>> This group should in some way mirror the
>     organisation/community/group
>      >>> that is expected to gather in the open space event. Usually, the
>      >>> planning group consists of 5 to 20 people.
>      >>> They need to be invited by the sponsor to the planning meeting.
>      >>>
>      >>> Ok, here is the design of the planning meeting which takes 3,5
>     hours
>      >>> either before lunch or later in the morning with lunch as a
>     break or in
>      >>> the afternoon or early evening... preferrably in the space in
>     which the
>      >>> os also is planned
>      >>>
>      >>> 10:00   Break, Arriving, Coffee …..
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> 10:30   Welcome by the sponsor who introduces the facilitator
>     for the
>      >>> following steps
>      >>>
>      >>>        Introducing ourselves   All
>      >>>        Introducing the agenda  Facilitator
>      >>>
>      >>> 10:45   The Day After
>      >>>        What is happening on "Monday, June 17, 2013, the day
>     after the
>      >>> event? Which perspectives do I see now? What has changed?
>      >>>
>      >>> The group itself creates a Mindmap with their thoughts/inputs
>      >>>
>      >>> 11:15   My Theme for the Open Space event
>      >>>        Individually                            3 minutes,
>      >>>        All announce their themes               2 minutes,
>      >>>        Work in subgroups                       15 minutes
>      >>>        Reporting to the whole group            5 minutes
>      >>>        Weighing the Themes                     10 minutes
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> Break beginning at noon
>      >>> Time for a look at the large meeting room and lunch
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> 2:00    Our Theme / provisional
>      >>>        Characteristics of an action-orienting theme….
>      >>>        A small group (3 to 5) of volunteers sit in front of the
>     entire
>      >>> group and designs the theme for the meeting,  provide an extra
>     chair for
>      >>> inputs from the large group, fish-bowl style.
>      >>>
>      >>> 2:45    Who all needs to be at the conference?
>      >>>        So that the expectations expressed for the day after
>     under the
>      >>> chosen theme will actually be met
>      >>>        Brainstorm, identify participants essential for the process
>      >>>        Check the Theme, still ok?
>      >>>
>      >>> 3:15 Nuts and Bolts
>      >>>        Collect things to do
>      >>>        Who will take care of what?
>      >>>
>      >>> 3:45 How was it today
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> 4:00 End
>      >>>
>      >>> This design has been used hundreds of times and works with any
>     group,
>      >>> even teachers, lawyers, scientists and mixtures of them and
>     especially
>      >>> well with children and in neighborhood groups in all cultures
>     around the
>      >>> globe.
>      >>>
>      >>> I will seperately send you a pdf documentation with pictures of a
>      >>> planning meeting.
>      >>>
>      >>> Greetings from Berlin
>      >>> mmp
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> On 30.05.2013 16:56, Eleder_BuM wrote:
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> Michael, you say,...
>      >>> /"if they in fact meet and follow the simple design I have
>     described on
>      >>> this list."/
>      >>> /
>      >>> /could you tell us more about  this design?
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> Thanks so much for your attention,
>      >>>
>      >>> Eleder
>      >>>
>      >>>    ____
>      >>>
>      >>> _______________________________________________
>      >>> OSList mailing list
>      >>> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org>
>      >>> <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org>>
>      >>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>     OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org>
>      >>> <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org>>
>      >>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>      >>>
>     http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>>
>      >>> _______________________________________________
>      >>> OSList mailing list
>      >>> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org>
>      >>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>     OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org>
>      >>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>      >>>
>     http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>      >>>
>      >>
>      >> --
>      >> Michael M Pannwitz
>      >> Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
>      >> ++49 - 30-772 8000 <tel:%2B%2B49%20-%2030-772%208000>
>      >>
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 410
>     resident Open Space Workers in 72 countries working in a total of
>     143 countries worldwide: www.openspaceworldmap.org
>     <http://www.openspaceworldmap.org>
>      >> _______________________________________________
>      >> OSList mailing list
>      >> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org>
>      >> To unsubscribe send an email to
>     OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org>
>      >> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>      >> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > OSList mailing list
>      > To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org>
>      > To unsubscribe send an email to
>     OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org>
>      > To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>      > http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>      >
>     _______________________________________________
>     OSList mailing list
>     To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org>
>     To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>     <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org>
>     To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>     http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> /Gail West, ICA/
> /3F, No. 12, Lane 5, Tien Mou W Rd
> Taipei, Taiwan 111
> Ph) 8862) 2871-3150/
> email) icataiw at gmail.com <mailto:icataiw at gmail.com>
> Skype) gwestica
> www.icatw.com <http://www.icatw.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>

-- 
Michael M Pannwitz
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
++49 - 30-772 8000



Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 410 resident Open 
Space Workers in 72 countries working in a total of 143 countries 
worldwide: www.openspaceworldmap.org



More information about the OSList mailing list