[OSList] 1,000 participants in 4 hours

[Michael M Pannwitz]

Dear Kari,
if an invitation is sent to all that the Planning Group (sponsor 
included) want to be at the event under the approach/question "who 
should be at the event so that the stuff we expect from the event under 
the Heading we came up with for the event will happen?" those receiving 
the invitation respond to the invitation the way one would usually 
respond: accept or decline (selfselection).
Huge advantage of this selfselection is that the people picking up their 
spirit and body to come are the right people.
People that come because they ought to, feel they have to, are forced to 
etc. are also selfselecting themselves.
And all that show up hear my words about "The Law" and my invitation to 
"obey" it (at least twice in the event)... listening to their feedback I 
find that most folks find it liberating when they follow The Law, and 
stay and participate (passionately).
Now, this is not really an answer to your question on the selection of 
the 1000 people.
The event that HO refers to occasionally (the event with 2108 
participants) took place at the end of a five day conference with 3500 
folks in attendance. In the invitation to the conference people wanting 
to attend the OST part had to sign up for it seperately (this determined 
how many cushions we bought and how much food was supplied and how many 
toilets had to be set up etc.) and pay an additonal fee.
In this way, following the invitation meant putting down some extra 
money, filling out a form with their contact data for the documentation 
all in addition to the decision that they wanted to be part of it. These 
kinds of commitments are perhaps trivial but many sponsors are trying to 
avoid to attach those commitments to the invitation to make it "easier" 
for people to come... also a form of control.

Like the breeze from Iceland which actually arrived during the night and 
brought a refreshingly cool morning
Greetings from Berlin
mmp

On 11.07.2013 07:55, Kári Gunnarsson wrote:
> A question here
>
> I have been a bit confused about the selection process for open space.
> In my last possibly large gathering, there I was opening up the idea
> to my client that we should have a self-selection of participants in
> the open space by use of open invitation letters to the possible
> participants. My client did not like that.
>
> How have these 1000 people been selected to take part in the open
> space and dose that mater in any way?
>
> with a breeze from Iceland
> Kári
>
> On 10 July 2013 19:56, Harrison Owen <hhowen at verizon.net> wrote:
>> Sharon Joy -- What a joy (excuse the pun) to see you here! You do have a
>> hand full, but it will be fun. With large groups, my biggest concern is
>> always to have enough space. And 1000 people do need some major room to
>> maneuver, particularly when the time is short. Two spaces are critical: in
>> the center of the circle, and at the wall. With that many people I would
>> look for a center open space of 100 feet across. It is more than likely that
>> you will have 100-150 people all rushing to the center, and that will become
>> quite confusing if they don’t have any room. And at the wall – remember that
>> there will be a time when you have 1000 people all trying to read what is up
>> there (issues) and make their session selections. If the wall is too short,
>> the people will bunch up, and when people are standing 5-6 deep, it will get
>> frustrating and things will move slowly. My rule of thumb is 6 inches of
>> wall per participant. That way people will never be more than 2-3 deep. You
>> can get away with less wall, but, but you do pay a price. In terms of time
>> periods I would suggest 1 ½ hours for the opening, 2 -- 1 hour Sessions, and
>> a half hour for the close, maybe even less. It is all “doable” but I do have
>> to ask: Why just 4 hours?
>>
>>
>>
>> I suspicion the answer is something like – there will be speeches and
>> presentations in the morning, which presumably will provide the people with
>> the necessary inspiration and information to do the job. However, every time
>> I have been in a situation like that, the information provided was never
>> enough, and the inspiration imparted simply didn’t do the job. More to the
>> point, there is an implicit statement made which I find most troubling. It
>> would seem that the wisdom of the several “presenters” somehow was equal to
>> and/or took precedence over the collective wisdom and experience of 1000
>> people. Of course this could be true, but if it is, I seriously doubt that
>> Opening Space will do all that much good. Probably better to just fire
>> (terminate) the lot. On the other hand, if that 1000 person collective
>> wisdom is of the sort and depth I suspect it to be – the allocation of time
>> is, if nothing else, short sighted and disrespectful. It might seem that the
>> “idiots and children” will be allowed a little play time after the experts
>> and adults have set the stage. Am I suggesting that you and your colleagues
>> thought this way? Definitely not. But that is a possible conclusion based on
>> the facts on the ground. And I have definitely experienced situations where
>> the “thought” not only occurred, but was totally conscious. Worst case was a
>> CEO of a large American corporation who was heard to say, “Never turn the
>> asylum over to the inmates.” The Asylum, of course was the company, and the
>> “inmates” were all the employees. Is it any wonder that creativity and
>> innovation at that company were virtually non-existent, and that employee
>> morale was dismal? Thankfully the company is now out of business.
>>
>>
>>
>> Doubtless I have gone way too far here, and knowing you Sharon Joy, I know
>> that such thoughts would never enter your mind. That said, I find that
>> sometimes what we do speaks so much louder than what we think or say. And
>> even worse when our actions are the direct antithesis of our real
>> intentions.
>>
>>
>>
>> Harrison
>>
>>
>>
>> Harrison Owen
>>
>> 7808 River Falls Dr.
>>
>> Potomac, MD 20854
>>
>> USA
>>
>>
>>
>> 189 Beaucaire Ave. (summer)
>>
>> Camden, Maine 04843
>>
>>
>>
>> Phone 301-365-2093
>>
>> (summer)  207-763-3261
>>
>>
>>
>> www.openspaceworld.com
>>
>> www.ho-image.com (Personal Website)
>>
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of OSLIST
>> Go to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>
>>
>>
>> From: oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org
>> [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org] On Behalf Of Sharon Joy Chao
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 8:39 PM
>> To: oslist at lists.openspacetech.org
>> Subject: [OSList] 1,000 participants in 4 hours
>>
>>
>>
>> Need to figure a way of convening a thousand government people to go through
>> an exploratory discussion on high performance system, all under 4 hours.
>>
>> This happens next week down south in the city of Cebu. The focus is on the
>> Philippine government service, its performance management system and how it
>> can be truly essential, responsive and life-giving.
>>
>> Gail West, my OS mentor friend, has provided me with some incredible
>> suggestions on how to proceed and she also advised me to post on OSList.
>>
>> Any thoughts on how best to proceed with a cast of thousand in 4 hours time?
>>
>> Maraming Salamat.
>>
>> ========================================
>> Sharon Joy Berlin Chao
>> SEAMEO INNOTECH
>> Commonwealth Avenue, U.P. Diliman, Quezon City
>> Metro Manila 1101 Philippines
>> Phone (632) 924-7681, 9267900
>> Fax (632) 928-7692
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSList mailing list
>> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>
>
>
>

-- 
Michael M Pannwitz
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
++49 - 30-772 8000



Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 410 resident Open 
Space Workers in 72 countries working in a total of 143 countries 
worldwide: www.openspaceworldmap.org