[OSList] number of topics and number of timeslots, presence board members

Chris Corrigan chris at chriscorrigan.com
Tue May 29 16:01:37 PDT 2012


Jeroen...and back to one part of your original question...

In groups of up to 50 I usually prepare breakout space enough for half of
those people to host topics over the course of the event.  Therefore a
group of 40 needs 20 breakout spaces.  Spread over two timeslots, that
means 10 breakout spaces.  Spread over three timeslots, well why not?
 Still 10 spaces.  You can never have too much space.

For groups 50-100 I assume something like 30 sessions will be held.  For
group of 100-200, up to 50 sessions will be held.  200-500, perhaps 80.
 Groups bigger than 500 can generate sessions at a rate of 15% of the total
number of people:  600 will produce up to 90, 800 might produce 120 and so
on.

So a formula...

0-50 = 50%
50-100 = 30%
100-200 = 25%
200-500 = 20%
600+ = 15%

How does that equate with other's experience?  Pannwitz Sr. keeps good
records...does that match?

Of course these are approximate ranges, but that helps me prepare.  Always
err on the side of preparing too many spaces.

Chris

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Linda Stevenson <stevenson8899 at msn.com>wrote:

>  Hi, Jeroen,
>
> I have used the following information successfully with clients - some of
> it may be of some use to you tomorrow, especially the last sentence!
>
> Good luck,
> Linda
>
>
>
> *Self-Organization and Open Space Technology*
>
> ** **
> The phenomenon of self-organization is not new. It has been around a few
> billion years. However, the intentional focus on self-organization
> utilizing Open Space Technology with organizations and communities, with
> just a 25 year history, is relatively new.****
>
> Self-organization and complexity theory were first talked about by
> scientists. It simply means that groups and communities as they come
> together have an inherent capability to organize “all by themselves.” From
> bacteria, bees, ant colonies, and now groups of people - what they all have
> in common is the ability to engage, collaborate, and create higher, more
> successfully adaptive, levels of functioning.****
>
> Open Space Technology is designed to leverage that natural power of
> self-organization to create more effective organizations and communities.
> Such a process requires not only a new way of thinking about process, but
> also about leadership and facilitation.
>
>
> **Originated by Harrison Owen, the Open Space process has been used
> throughout the world in organizations of every kind and size from 5 to
> 3,000 participants. He began designing Open Space Technology when, after
> spending a year and a half helping to shape and organize a large
> international conference, the evaluations indicated that the best part of
> the highly structured event were the coffee breaks! ****
>
> That was an “ah-ha”moment for Harrison who then set out to design a
> process that was so elemental it could not fail and just as compelling as a
> really good coffee break. With the help of some friends and colleagues
> Open Space emerged.In hindsight, the coffee break and Open Space are
> quite simply highly effective and efficient examples of deliberately
> tapping into the power of self-organization – the natural ability of groups
> and communities to creatively collaborate and successfully adapt. The
> elegance and simplicity of the process as well as the powerful
> collaborations and the effective results always surpass expectations.*****
> ***
> **
>
> Margaret Wheatley describes the relevance of self-organization to
> organizations and communities as follows:
>
> *In self-organization, structures emerge. They are not imposed. They
> spring from the process of doing the work. These structures will be
> useful but temporary. We can expect them to emerge and recede as needed. *
> **
>
> *It is not the design of a specific structure that requires our attention
> but rather the conditions that will support the emergence of necessary
> structures. When we work with organizing-as-process rather than
> organization-as-object, it changes what we do. Processes do their own
> work. Our wonderful abilities to self-organize are encouraged by openness. We,
> like all life, can anticipate what is required of us, connect with those we
> need, and respond intelligently.*
>
> The success of Open Space Technology depends on establishing and trusting
> that the following “conditions” can set the stage for self-organization:**
> **
>
>
>    1. An important issue ****
>    2. Levels of complexity ****
>    3. Rich diversities of opinions and participants****
>    4. Plenty of passion****
>    5. Potential for conflict****
>    6. Genuine sense of urgency****
>
>
> Given the complexity of any human system, the process itself may sound too
> simple, but the results are unbelievably effective and efficient. OST
> always works, provided the initial “conditions”are met and the integrity of
> the process is honored.
>
> Open Space thrives on new connections, new learning, and new ways of being
> together. From finding common ground and experiencing trust, there emerge
> more effective collaborations, structures, and leadership through continued
> partnerships and communication based on passion and taking responsibility
> for any next steps which are identified during the process.
>
> Opening such a collaborative space will allow the discovery of not only
> the issues and opportunities, but also the greater capacities needed.  It
> also can unleash the creative leadership potential, talents and resources
> of everyone involved while allowing them to take responsibility for the
> emergent outcomes. Everyone involved will become the champions for
> necessary change. As Margaret Wheatley insightfully points out *“people
> don’t resist change, they resist having it imposed on them.” *In other
> words, people don’t get behind something they were not involved in helping
> to create. ****
>
> ** **
>
> > Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 23:03:43 +0200
> > From: jrn.rmrs at gmail.com
> > To: oslist at lists.openspacetech.org
>
> > Subject: Re: [OSList] number of topics and number of timeslots, presence
> board members
> >
> > Hi Linda,
> >
> > thanks for the offer. Tomorrow I have a talk with members of the
> > projectgroup. I'll keep you posted on the outcome and depending on the
> > outcome of this talk I might take you up on your offer.
> >
> > all the best
> >
> > jeroen
> > _______________________________________________
> > OSList mailing list
> > To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> > To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> > http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>
>


-- 
---
CHRIS CORRIGAN
Facilitation - Training - Process Design
Open Space Technology

Weblog: http://www.chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot
Site: http://www.chriscorrigan.com

*Upcoming workshops*
*
*
*
Art of Hosting
November 12-15, 2012, Bowen Island, BC, Canada.
(email me for more information)
*
*
*
YET: the improv-based facilitation course you have always wanted to take!
2012, Bowen Island, BC, Canada
(email me for more information)

*
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20120529/caf9f37f/attachment-0008.htm>


More information about the OSList mailing list