[OSList] number of topics and number of timeslots, presence board members

[Dr. Christian Kemper]

Dear wonderful list members, dear Jeroen,

just want to add my two cents after finishing a three day os with a 
school community i had the honour to facilitate - and just to confirm 
all your experienced numbers (following the german saying that the 
exeption confirms the rule): 1.42 topics per person (either child or 
parent or teacher or whatever)!
:-)

It is so great to open space for children and much older people. They 
filled the gym and the whole area with so much energy - it was just 
unbelievable. And they decided finally (as one of their projects) to 
welcome each and every child from now on, practising inclusion, and 
stopping exclusion which is still usual in german schools.
In between a child aged 7 came to the facilitation team saying "thank 
you for the festival" - and ran just away to another small group hard 
working and discussing how to exceed the normal length of lessons in 
school to have more time to get into the themes...

Thank you to the whole list,
blessings
Christian

Dr. Christian Kemper | inbetweener huven.kemper GbR |
Laufenbergstrasse 38 | D-53173 Bonn |
M. 0049 . 174 . 921 66 11 | T. 0049 . 22 8 . 33 60 28 44 |
ck at inbetweener.eu | www.inbetweener.eu



Am 31.05.2012 09:55, schrieb jeroen ermers:
> To all (who responded to my questions on number of topics/number of timeslots),
>
> thank you for all your replies, besides the swiftness of your answers
> i especially appreciated the depth of the answers. It made me feel
> being part of sort of a family (who needs new social media with an
> effective "old school" bulletin board like this? :-))
>
> the OST meeting i was referring to by the way has been cancelled, the
> organisation has just announced to start a reorganisation in which
> this OST meeting does not fit well (at least not at this moment in
> time).
>
> jeroen
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Raffi Aftandelian
> <raffi_1970 at yahoo.com>  wrote:
>> chris-jan, salam!
>>
>> i didn't quite follow --  your numbers are based on events of what length?
>>
>> thanks!
>> raffi