[OSList] FW: Welcome to the 5th principle in order to remain 4
Ria Baeck
ria.baeck at vitis-tct.be
Wed Jun 8 23:49:17 PDT 2011
I know that the work at Saybrook University is inspired by the work of
the Powers of Place Initiative, headed by Sheryl Erickson. There is a
website with a very huge list of resources
http://www.powersofplace.com/
and an online community with a list of transformational places (PlaceBook):
http://powersofplace-workspace.ning.com/
With love,
Ria
On 8/06/11 17:22, donna.read at managing4wellness.org wrote:
> Well, I'm not sure that place should not be included. There is some
> really interesting work being done in the OS Department at Saybrook
> University on the "power of place." If anyone is interested, I'll go
> dig it out. Best, Donna
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [OSList] FW: Welcome to the 5th principle in order to remain
> 4
> From: "Harrison Owen" <hhowen at verizon.net <mailto:hhowen at verizon.net>>
> Date: Tue, June 07, 2011 2:14 pm
> To: "'World wide Open Space Technology email list'"
> <oslist at lists.openspacetech.org
> <mailto:oslist at lists.openspacetech.org>>
>
> I think I’ve found the secret. It is not so much what I said – but
> what we all said which was “carried along” as a continuation of
> the thread. So the answer is Delete, Delete, Delete.
> Maybe?
> Harrison//
> Jorge – Welcome! And don’t stay away so long!!
> Two principles about “time.” You’re right! But are both necessary?
> I thought so at the time (bad pun J). The principles (all of them)
> popped into my head over a period of years as I noticed the
> strange things that happened in Open Space – and particularly the
> strange things that appeared to perplex people. I found myself
> enunciating the principles as a way of pointing out what they were
> likely to run into and to suggest that, strange as it might seem,
> everything would work out just fine.
> The first Principle should make the point. Everybody was always
> concerned that the “right” people come to a meeting. Usually they
> meant those people with the political position, the appropriate
> authority, or the right expertise. The experience, however, went
> in a very different direction. Often it seemed like that even if
> NONE of the “right” people showed up still very useful things
> happened. I confess it took me a while to figure out why that
> might be true – but from the start, it just seemed like a fact of
> life. Counter-intuitive as it might seem, “Whoever comes is the
> right people.”
> The two “time” Principles showed up for similar reasons. Obviously
> they are both about time, but very different sorts of time. There
> is “beginning” time and “ending” time. And people seemed very
> concerned about each, but for different reasons. I noticed that
> folks were often sweating the fact that we might not start “on
> time.” But I also noticed that whenever we started, everything
> seemed to work out just fine – hence, “Whenever it starts is the
> right time.”
> Ending time is a different creature. And most people just really
> don’t want to talk about it. In extreme situations that sort of
> time is called “death.” But even in more proximate situations,
> “ending” is something we would rather not confront. Hopefully,
> things will just go on forever. But the don’t! All of this
> becomes quite difficult when we spend a lot of time and effort
> keeping something going, when in fact it is already ended. Dead so
> to speak. Companies that have seen better days and should just
> retire from the field of battle with a good funeral just keep
> plugging away, wasting massive amounts of human energy and Spirit.
> In truth they would do everybody a favor, themselves included, if
> they would just admit the obvious, It’s over! Hence the Principle:
> “When it is over, it’s over.”
> There is really nothing very arcane and deep theory about these 5
> Principles. Just funny things I’ve noticed that sometimes seem to
> get in people’s way as they move in Open Space. The Principles
> don’t actually change a thing. What’s going to happen will. But
> when folks have a “heads-up” it seems to make it a little easier
> for them.
> Harrison
> Harrison Owen
> 7808 River Falls Dr.
> Potomac, MD 20854
> USA
> Phone 301-365-2093
> www.openspaceworld.com <http://www.openspaceworld.com>
> www.ho-image.com <http://www.ho-image.com> (Personal Website)
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives
> of OSLIST Go
> to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
> *From:*oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org
> <mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org>
> [mailto:oslist-bounces at lists.openspacetech.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Jorge amigo
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 07, 2011 10:11 AM
> *To:* 'Jorge amigo'; 'World wide Open Space Technology email list'
> *Subject:* Re: [OSList] Welcome to the 5th principle in order to
> remain 4
> Dear community
> I would like to delve a little deeper on the idea that I have
> raised with the title "Welcome the 5th principle in order to
> remain 4”.
> First, tell you I appreciate and value the open space is OSLIST
> virtual. I am basically a peripheral participant OSLIST. Very few
> times I've written something, but I am a legitimate peripheral to
> live in freedom and responsibility to participate from time to
> time on subjects that interest me.
> And this has been the case. The appearance of the reflections and
> comments on the 5 th Principle has interested me. I believe that
> the talks that have emerged on this new principle have been a
> great contribution to cultivate the spirit of the OS, for to
> flourish his essence.
> The foundations for the incorporation of this new principle seem
> solid and have been exhibited with clarity by Harrison Owen and
> others. This new principle, - which has always been there-, makes
> me much sense incorporate it into the opening of OS, because it
> provides an essential distinction to the experience of the spirit
> of the OS.
> But it was his appearance that made me take a fresh look to each
> of the other Principles. I wondered what was the equivalent
> contribution of each one, which led me to review the focus and the
> ideas associated with each.
> The focus of the first principle is people. The recognition that
> whatever is done will be done by people who are there. In our
> practice as facilitators, with my dear friend Juan Luis,
> enunciated this principle as "somos los que estamos, estamos los
> que somos" an expression that our culture promotes the idea that
> those are the best people to carry out the task . This focus
> responds to the who / whom
> The focus of the second, the action is, what is happening, what
> people do, the experience of what I will do - we will do, I do -
> we do, I did – we did. The lived process, the successful product.
> It responds to what
> For me, the focus of the third and fourth principle is only one,
> is time. Present as one principle helps to raise awareness of the
> relationship we have with time. From the experience of time to
> create, to learn. To start and finish. The title of this merger
> could be "when it starts, it starts, When it is over, it is over."
> This focus responds to when
> And there is the new principle, which brings the experience of
> space itself. The place of meeting, whatever, will always be an
> appropriate place. There is the worry about whether he could be in
> a better place, once there, this is the right place. Responds to
> where.
> That's how I came to wonder the idea of welcoming the principle
> 5 in order to remain 4.
> But also in terms of form, I like the idea of 4 to 5 Principles.
> I think four is more harmonious with the circle of the OS figure.
> Shape 4 shows key dimensions of life: the 4 cardinal points, the 4
> seasons, the 4 basic elements and others. Finally, also, that less
> is more.
> But maybe I'm not seeing something important to justify the two
> principles associated with the time necessary and useful to
> present them separately. If so, please ask me what they indicate.
> OS has been effective so far as it is and I believe that the
> Principles are 4 or 5, does not add anything significant. In any
> case, try my idea in the next OS to provide.
> Finally, reflect on the subject I have found attractive, I
> recreated the spirit of OS.
> A hug for everyone and we hope in Chile, the right place for the
> next Wosonos.
> Jorge Amigo
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> <mailto:OSList at lists.openspacetech.org>
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> <mailto:OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org>
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList at lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to OSList-leave at lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20110609/7fee231b/attachment-0008.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 22288 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20110609/7fee231b/attachment-0008.png>
More information about the OSList
mailing list