Youth Leaders

John's Email jfs.rapp at gmail.com
Sat Oct 9 19:09:52 PDT 2010


Why reading early, Tree?  This is the Biggest intrusion on childhood.  
Most humanity -- esp historically -- Heard stories.



On Oct 9, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Tree Fitzpatrick <therese.fitzpatrick at gmail.com 
 > wrote:

> You are certainly entitled to your beliefs, everyone who has  
> commented.
>
> Eleven year olds who are organizing anti-war demonstrations have not  
> been given a childhood that might have allowed that child to  
> continue his/her inner development to become even better able to  
> achieve a fully realized adult person. There are biological reasons  
> why the human being develops so much more slowly than, say, a horse.  
> It is not just about physical . . there are inner aspects to being  
> human that cannot be rushed. A central, tragic, mistake is the kind  
> of thinking many are reflecting here, talk about all children  
> developing at different stages . .
>
> why not let all humans drink alcohol from age fifteen?
>
> why do we have the voting age at 18 and why was it at 21 for so long?
>
> because the human being is not a full adult until age 21 and, even,  
> older. .. it's not just about emotional and physical maturity. We  
> are spiritual beings.
>
> It is our spiritual beings that are most stunted when we allow  
> children to enter adult decision making and adult simulation at  
> younger and younger ages.
>
> It is child abuse, in my opinion, to have events like the TED  
> event. . . I know nobody at that event would agree with me. IMO, and  
> I do get to have it, inviting children to sit on the boards of  
> things like TED and the Jane Goodall institute or, my goodness,  
> citizen/community policy bords, amounts to cultural and child abuse.  
> Do we want fully evolved human beings to carry the human race into  
> the future? or do we want working clones for corporations?
>
> I want fully evolved human beings and to get those, we need to keep  
> children asleep in childhood.That means no television, no internet.  
> It means reading. It means adding in their heads, not calculators.  
> And it means not pressuring children to raise money for charity and  
> antiwar demonstrations.
>
> Everyone can believe whatever they want.  Let's see how the world  
> does with children who spend their childhoods in front of television  
> and now, online.
>
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Pat Black <patoitextiles at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
> Hello Tree
> I have never agreed and disagreed more strongly with the same  
> thought before.  It took me some time to sit with your ideas as I  
> unpacked my own reaction to your statements.  I do not believe I  
> misunderstand your beliefs about how you think childhoods should be  
> protected and sheltered and I don't disagree with you in theory.   
> They should be protected and sheltered. There is no going back to  
> stolen childhoods and childhood can be stolen. I do think childhoods  
> can be stolen  under the guise of protection and shelter.
>    I do think there are developmental stages and that it's important  
> for us to go through all those stages as we grow because we will use  
> those stages as scaffolding as we become ourselves.  Having said  
> that I also believe that we all come to be with a different set of  
> tools and brilliant abilities.  Those unique qualities of self allow  
> us to move through different developmental stages with different  
> abilities and different times.  Here is where I take exception with  
> what you are proposing and Waldorf for that matter.  Each brings our  
> own time to the equation.  Some are ready to take on experiences  
> interacting with adults and their world in very competent ways at  
> very young ages.  In fact, they need to have those experiences to  
> find the self they came to be.  I know for myself I was already  
> organizing anti-war events by the time I was 11.  No one expected,  
> pushed or even encouraged me to this.  I felt compelled by what I  
> saw in the world and a deep need to change it.  I am grateful that  
> as difficult as it was for my parents to allow me to do these things  
> because they kept me on the path to myself.  My daughter was crying  
> about flowers picked that didn't want to be picked by the time she  
> was 2, raising money for pre-schools in Central America by the time  
> she was 7 and comfortably reading essays she wrote to political  
> demonstration with crowds of 50,000 people by the time she was 11.   
> My son on the other hand is 22 and still not ready to navigate the  
> world as an adult.  He needs more time.  The issue for me is not  
> whether I think a young person should participate in certain venues  
> normally occupied by adults.  The issue is where the children are  
> driven to go.  What do the children think?  Are they there because  
> their own heart has passion and commitment or are they there because  
> someone else thinks that is where they should be?  Childhood should  
> be protected and sheltered.  I agree with that.  I also think it  
> needs to be driven by the child's passion and commitment not the  
> adults sense of what is appropriate for a child.  I am thinking  
> about the recent hoopla about the 16 year old girl who wanted to  
> sail around the world and all the talk about child abuse.  There was  
> a time when she was out of radio contact and all the world was a  
> twitter about what happened to her because the loss of contact came  
> after a bad storm in the Pacific where she was.  After some days  
> they found the boat and team rescued her.  Her mast broke in the  
> storm and with that her satellite communications were down.  The  
> questioners went on and on to her about her safety and whether she  
> was alright and whether she should be out in a boat sailing by  
> herself and her reply was "It was just a storm".  This child can  
> only become herself through the sea and if you deny her the sea you  
> deny her herself.
> I am just saying it is for the child to chose the direction and the  
> speed and the adults to do what they can to facility the possibility.
> Pat Black
>
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Tree Fitzpatrick <therese.fitzpatrick at gmail.com 
> > wrote:
> Michael, and other comments. .. I don't think anyone commenting  
> actually understood what I tried to say so I conclude that I failed  
> to communicate.
>
> Young humans are not yet fully evolved humans. What all young people  
> need, including the most precocious of them, including ones that get  
> asked to sit on the board of the Jane Goodall Institute, is to be  
> children.  It is only by being children than humans can become fully  
> realized adults.
>
> The world needs fully realized adults to achieve our shared, highest  
> destiny. When we push children out of childhood and into the adult  
> realm, those people rarely, if ever, get space later in life to go  
> back and fill in the gaps of what was missing.
>
> Michael, yes, indeed, children can bring a lovely element to any  
> open space. . . but that does not mean that it is right.  Children  
> should not be asked to participate in adult matters.  Ever.
>
> The damage contemporary society does to childhood is a very serious,  
> long-term consequence to humanity. If we do not keep children asleep  
> in childhood so they might do the inner work of their inner beings,  
> we will have a human future full of unrealized 'grown ups'.  It is  
> casual, nonsensical folly to bring children -- unformed adults --  
> into adult discussions. It is wrong on a gagillion levels.
>
> We are all so caught up in rushing towards the future. One thing we  
> humans cannot 'rush' is the slow development and incubation of fully  
> realized human beings:  that development takes place in childhood.  
> It is irrationally folly to bring children into adult decisions.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Michael M Pannwitz  
> <mmpanne at boscop.org> wrote:
> Dear Tree,
> from where I sit (public) decision making as presently practiced,  
> for instance in Germany, is ineffective, creates larger problems, is  
> lobby-infested, dogmatic, expensive, not even a good show... who  
> would want to be part of that?
> What I have experienced often in "formal" open space events and in  
> the "normal" open space of everyday life (like the 1,5 year old  
> daughter of a neighbor visiting and taking over our household, very  
> effectively involving us in her life and experiments, curious,  
> decisions?-easy for her....pure joy)is that kids of all ages thrive  
> in it.
> But then, thats not decision making in the sense of sitting on a  
> "board" of whatsoever.
> Day-care children, grade school kids, highschool kids, teenagers...  
> are the greatest gift to an open space event, so I encourage their  
> taking part and it seems to always have been productive, fun,  
> healthy...
>
> Have a great day
> Greetings from Berlin
> mmp
>
> Tree Fitzpatrick schrieb:
> There are many things off kilter in human culture. One thing that I  
> think is
> off kilter is that adult humans now routinely encourage non-adult  
> humans to
> participate in things like 'public decision making'.  Where did we  
> get the
> assumption that a young person has the capacity of a fully evolved  
> adult
> human to make informed decisions that might have long term  
> consequences on
> the child, other children, the community, the culture, etc? Children  
> are not
> yet adult.
>
> We encourage children to 'awaken' to adulthood far too early.
>
> I am appalled that many now take it for granted that children (a non- 
> adult
> is still a child) should sit on something like the Board of  
> Directors of
> something like the Jane Goddall Institute (whatever that is, I imagine
> Ashley meant Jane Goddall).
>
> This is a major flaw, I think, in evolving culture and it has  
> endlessly
> complex repercussions.
>
> Children's job is to be children, to developo their own personhood  
> fully so
> that they will one day take a place in adult community. Children  
> awaken to
> adult considerations much too early. TElevision has been a huge  
> culprit in
> this regard and now, of course, the internet.
>
> A child's main work is being a child. It's just not right to  
> cavalierly get
> youth input into decisioins that children cannot, just cannot,  
> really know.
> A twelve year old, a sixteen year old, is not mature enough to make  
> complex
> public decisions and it is wrong to ask them to:  asking children to
> participate in grown up life as peers with the adults dishonors  
> children
>
> I get my main attitudes about children from having sent my child to a
> Waldorf School and having been a student of Rudolf STeiner for over  
> twenty
> years. Much of what is wrong with human culture can be traced to the
> practice of stunting youthful inner development under the guise of  
> awakening
> children too early to adult concerns. This is why we now have an  
> education
> system in USA that is focussed on test scores instead of the inner
> development of children. There is a story in today's NYTImes about how
> publishers are publishing less picture books and how parents  
> pressure four
> years olds to listen to long stories and skip picture books so they  
> will
> have better test scores later. . . this dynamic is connected to  
> including
> youth in public decisinmaking.
>
> I know this is a very popular trend and I know Ashely Cooper is deeply
> invested in the world and I know she is a good caring person intent on
> making positive contributions in the world.
>
> I get to have my opinion, yes?  I am worried about the millions of  
> humans
> who are children today who are not cloud-gazing and spending their  
> summers
> hunting rocks and birds' nests and who are told, when they are  
> twelve, that
> they can contribute to public decisions. Grown up humans have a duty  
> to
> children:  to let them be children. Otherwise what we are creating  
> is an
> army of humans who are not fully developed humans who will make good  
> wage
> slaves for the elite billionaires running the tea part movement.  
> Thinking
> caring loving people should not participate in pushing children into  
> the
> adult arena while children.
>
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:51 PM, ashley cooper
> <mail.easilyamazed at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> Hello Open Space friends,
>
> I have fallen off of the OSlist for awhile, but I wanted to share  
> with you
> a talk from a recent TEDx event that I hosted,  
> TEDxNextGenerationAsheville<http://www.tedxnextgenerationasheville.com/ 
> >.
>
> This event was all about spotlighting the ideas of young people and  
> giving
> them a public stage from which to share and be heard. It was also an
> invitation for there to be more collaboration between youth and  
> adults.
> Chase Pickering spoke about the role of youth in leadership and how  
> young
> people can contribute to public decision-making and serve on Board of
> Directors (which he did with the Jane Goddall Institute). If you are  
> in a
> position to invite a youth to serve on your board of directors or  
> advisory
> board or encourage the clients you work with, please consider Chase's
> advice!
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27IJpZVP1qs
>
> You can also watch Birke Baehr's talk about the food we eat. He is  
> an 11
> year old who is passionate about food and whose talk has gone viral  
> and been
> viewed over 200,000 times in less than 2 weeks.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7Id9caYw-Y
>
> Sending fondest regards from Asheville, NC, USA,
> Ashley
>
> P.s. If you would like to respond to me personally, please send it to
> easilyamazed at gmail.com . I have not been checking this account  
> regularly.
> Thank you.
> * * ==========================================================
> OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU ------------------------------ To
> subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of
> oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
> http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about
> OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Michael M Pannwitz, boscop eg
> Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
> ++49-30-772 8000
> mmpanne at boscop.org
> www.boscop.org
>
>
> Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 407 resident  
> Open Space Workers in 69 countries working in a total of 141  
> countries worldwide
> Have a look:
> www.openspaceworldmap.org
>
> *
> *
> ==========================================================
>
> OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> ------------------------------
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
> http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
>
> To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
> http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
>
>
>
> -- 
> Love rays,
> Tree Fitzpatrick  (check out my new address)
>
>
> . . . the great and incalculable grace of love, which says, with  
> Augustine, "I want you to be," without being able to give any  
> particular reason for such supreme and unsurpassable affirmation.   
> -- Hannah Arendt
>
> 2175 Kittredge St Apt 615
> Berkeley, CA 94704
> 510-665-4825
> * * ========================================================== OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU 
>  ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change  
> your options, view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html 
>  To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
>
> * * ========================================================== OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU 
>  ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change  
> your options, view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html 
>  To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
>
>
>
> -- 
> Love rays,
> Tree Fitzpatrick  (check out my new address)
>
>
> . . . the great and incalculable grace of love, which says, with  
> Augustine, "I want you to be," without being able to give any  
> particular reason for such supreme and unsurpassable affirmation.   
> -- Hannah Arendt
>
> 2175 Kittredge St Apt 615
> Berkeley, CA 94704
> 510-665-4825
> * * ========================================================== OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU 
>  ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change  
> your options, view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html 
>  To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20101009/02e0629d/attachment-0016.htm>


More information about the OSList mailing list