Christopher Alexander & the space we are shaping
douglas germann
76066.515 at compuserve.com
Sun Sep 6 10:20:07 PDT 2009
Hi--
Still reading Christopher Alexander and finding lots of parallels to OS:
Most important of all, it was the space (more than the building)
which was being formed. That flies against 20th-century
awareness, which places too much emphasis on buildings. What
mattered about the building is the contribution it makes to the
formation of shaped, coherent, public space. That was where the
inspiration came from, and it was that—later—which made it
possible to make the building beautiful. Christopher Alexander,
The Nature of Order: An Essay on the Art of Building and The
Nature of the Universe, Book Three: A Vision of a Living World,
p 138
In another instance, he says that in designing a home, it is best to
design the garden first: when that is placed in the most health-giving,
nurturing spot, then the house is made that much better, that much more
wonderful. Garden first!
The question this raises for me for OS is: most often the communities in
which we are opening space want to accomplish some *thing*. This thing
is Alexander's building. But he does not look first at the building;
rather he tries to shape public space--give it volume, life. What are we
trying to shape when we open space?
It is easy for me to throw in a glib "we simply are there to open
space," but I think the inquiry needs to go deeper than that. What is
the shape of opened space? What makes it coherent? What are the factors
which give it shape?
:- Doug.
*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
More information about the OSList
mailing list