Open Space with an National Sporting Team (long)

Brendan McKeague mckeague at iprimus.com.au
Wed May 14 21:14:33 PDT 2008


Hi folks
A friend of mine here in Western Australia, Sandy 
Gordon, a sports psychologist at one of the local 
universities, has been experimenting with the use 
of Open Space since he first encountered the 
process (and me!) a few years ago. He's recently 
written an interesting article in the Feb 2008 
edition of InsPsych, the bulletin of the 
Australian Psychological Society about his 
combination of Appreciative Inquiry and Open 
Space with a national Cricket team.....a 
fascinating story.....thanks Sandy....and I 
wonder if there are any other stories about the 
use of OS with professional, or other, sporting teams...???
Cheers
Brendan
(Howzat! = cricket slang for 'How is that, umpire'?)

Enhancing the team work of the Sri Lankan cricket team
A case study of applying Appreciative Inquiry

By Dr Sandy Gordon FAPS
School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, The 
University of Western Australia

  This case study describes a strengths-based 
approach to enhancing the teamwork of the Sri 
Lankan cricket team prior to their April-July 
2006 tour of England. As the team’s sport 
psychologist I was asked to facilitate the first 
team meeting upon our arrival in London. I chose 
the theme ‘What gives life to Sri Lankan Cricket 
when it is at its best?’ and used a combination 
of ‘Appreciative Inquiry’ (AI), including ‘Naming 
Elephants’ and ‘AI 4-D Cycle’, and ‘Open Space Technology’.

  The Appreciative Inquiry process
Appreciative Inquiry (AI) was first 
conceptualised in 1980 by doctoral student David 
Cooperrider and his thesis supervisor Sruresh 
Srivasta, who had both been engaged in an 
organisation change project. Instead of detailing 
root causes of failure, they learned to focus on 
the root causes of success, and called their 
approach ‘Appreciative Inquiry’. AI is 
underpinned by core principles and core processes 
that are understood to have emerged from 
theoretical and research foundations grounded in 
social constructionism, the ‘new’ sciences (e.g., 
positive psychology, chaos theory and 
self-organising systems), and research on the 
power of imagery (Cooperrider, Whitney, & 
Stavros, 2005). For the purposes of this article, 
AI is regarded as a positive, strengths-based 
operational approach to change, learning and 
development that seemed suitable to enhancing teamwork in professional cricket.

Various models and approaches for applying AI 
have emerged including the ‘4-D Cycle’, which is 
widely used and can be as rapid and informal as a 
conversation with a colleague, or as formal as a 
four-day organisation-wide process. In order of 
presentation, the four key processes in the AI 4-D cycle are:

1.      Discovery: Identifying the ‘best of what 
has been or what is’ and supporting the clients’ belief in a positive future
2.      Dream: Creating a clear results-oriented 
vision in relation to discovered potential and 
encouraging clients to conceive images of possibilities
3.      Design: Creating possibility propositions 
of the newly expressed dream and assisting 
clients in bringing the dream into focus
4.      Destiny: Strengthening the affirmative 
capability of clients and helping them recognise the dream in the present.

At the centre of the cycle is the ‘affirmative 
topic choice’ or theme, which is the starting 
point and most strategic aspect of any AI process.

  Appreciative Inquiry Coaching (AIC) is the 
practical application of the core AI principles 
and is highly effective for various coaching 
purposes, e.g., leadership, development, and 
working relationships. Table 1 lists the 
assumptions of both AI and AIC about life, people 
and the change process itself, which form the 
basis of Orem, Binkert, and Clancy’s (2007, p. 
26) model of Appreciative Coaching.

  Table 1. Assumptions of Appreciative Inquiry 
and Appreciative Coaching Inquiry
(Orem, Binkert, & Clancy, 2007)
·            In every society, organisation, 
group or individual something works
·            What people focus on becomes their reality
·            Reality is created in the moment, 
and there are multiple realities
·            The act of asking questions of an 
organisation, group, or individual influences the 
group or individual in some way
·            People are more confident and 
comfortable in their journey to the future (the 
unknown) when they carry forward parts of the past (the known)
·            If people carry parts of the past 
forward, those parts should be what is best about the past
·            It is important to value differences
·            The language people use creates their reality

Sri Lankan teamwork breakdown
Having been appointed to Sri Lankan Cricket in 
June 2005 and toured with the team in Sri Lanka 
and Australia later that year, I observed that 
most players did not speak up when opportunities 
arose at meetings, and younger players in 
particular didn’t appear to either want to or 
know how to say what they felt. This was just one 
example of poor teamwork and effectively shut 
down possibilities for innovative ideas from 
younger players who possessed exciting potential. 
I suggested to the coach that, prior to an AI 
team meeting, that I engage the players in 
‘Naming Elephants’ (Hammond & Mayfield, 2004), 
which is a metaphor for  making implicit issues 
explicit, bringing certain Sri Lankan Cricket 
‘undiscussables’ into the open, or having ‘difficult conversations’.

The intent of the workshop was to learn how to 
name and recognise unnamed ‘Elephants’, to 
understand the primary benefit of naming them 
(i.e., innovation and taking action), and to 
learn from each other, not to attack or blame. 
The rules were simple: expect and respect 
different points of view; avoid trying to 
identify who wrote what; and avoid naming names – 
if the ‘Elephant’ is a person, only describe his 
behaviour and its impact on Sri Lankan Cricket.

For Step 1 of the workshop, I asked them: “What 
are the ‘things’ we aren’t openly talking about 
as a team that you think we should be talking 
about?”. Players wrote one ‘undiscussable’ per 
sheet of paper in pencil and could write as many 
as they liked in 5-10 minutes before returning 
all sheets to me. In Step 2, I read out each 
sheet and together we grouped those items that 
seemed related and came up with a name for each 
category. In 10-15 minutes I also asked the 
players to clarify what the ‘Elephant’ category 
looked like in behavioural terms and its impact 
or cost to Sri Lankan Cricket. Finally in Step 3, 
I spent 10-15 minutes enquiring about solutions 
and asking: “What do we propose to do about it?”.

In less than 60 minutes, 15 players produced 18 
sheets of paper, 13 of which identified the same 
‘Elephant’, namely “intimidation, negative and 
pessimistic communication to junior players by 
senior players generally”. The impact of this 
behaviour was “lower morale among junior players 
who emotionally switched off and suppressed ideas 
and thoughts of voicing contributions”. In 
addition to meeting all workshop intentions, this 
session created a much safer environment at 
subsequent team meetings for younger players to 
offer innovative suggestions and ideas about both 
individual and team work. It was clear to me that 
‘Naming Elephants’ was an essential precursor to the meeting that followed.


Adding ‘Open Space Technology’ to the AI team meeting
Later, during the same AI team meeting and after 
the Discovery phase, I introduced the four 
Principles and one Law of ‘Open Space Technology’ 
(OST), which Harrison Owen (1997) first developed 
in 1984. OST has since been used around the world 
with all types of organisations including 
corporations, community groups, government 
agencies, schools and churches, and with groups 
of 5-2500 people (Bunker & Alban, 2006). I had 
trained as an OST facilitator in Perth and had 
previously used it with the Western Australian 
Cricket Association, however, this was my first 
opportunity to combine AI with OST. While the 
former provides clear and powerful direction 
using questions that connect participants with 
each other as they discover universal stories 
about ‘What gives them life?’, the latter allows 
freedom to learn from and listen to others who 
share the same heart, passion and responsibility for their collective future.

I used the following OST Principles during the 
Dream and Design phases within the AI 4-D Cycle. 
OST begins with an invitation to participants to 
attend. Players were also invited to form a 
circle so, without a word spoken, no hierarchy 
was evident in the team room. OST is guided by 
four Principles and one Law and each in their own 
way advanced the appreciative team environment.

The first Principle of OST, ‘Whoever comes is the 
right people’, reminded players that they cared 
enough to come to discuss the session theme (What 
gives life to Sri Lankan cricket when it is at 
its best?). The second Principle, ‘Whatever 
happens is the only thing that could have’, 
focused their attention on the present moment. 
The third Principle, ‘Whenever it starts is the 
right time’, and the flip-side fourth Principle, 
‘When it’s over it’s over’, provided a beginning, 
middle and end structure to all discussions. The 
one ‘Law of Two Feet’, meant that at any time 
players who felt that they were neither learning 
or contributing could use their two feet to go 
somewhere else and do something more useful, such 
as visit another group discussion or simply have 
time out. Both the Principles and Law gave the 
players permission to self-organise and say and 
do what they wanted in the time available. The 
invitation was to be fully and completely 
themselves as they discussed ‘what gives life to 
their batting, bowling, fielding, training, and 
off-field social activities, when it is at its best?’.

The meeting ran for five hours (three hours over 
schedule), nobody left the room, and both senior 
management and senior players rated it as the 
“best team meeting ever”. Sri Lanka subsequently 
drew the three Test series 1-1 and white washed 
England 5-0 in One Day Internationals, their best 
overseas tour performance in 25 years.

Applications of AI in other settings
Both Kelm (2005) and Stavros and Torres (2005) 
appear to have made transferable applications of 
AI to enhancing daily living convincingly 
possible, and examples of  ‘success stories’ in 
business and workplace settings are available at 
<http://www.aiconsulting.org/>www.aiconsulting.org/. 
I believe strengths-based strategies like 
Appreciative Inquiry are ideally suited for 
helping teams enhance their teamwork and, in 
addition to the references listed below, I 
encourage those charged with the responsibility 
of coordinating coaching and leadership 
development programs to browse the resources on 
the AI Commons website 
(<http://www.appreciativeinquiry.case.edu/>www.appreciativeinquiry.case.edu/).

References
Bunker, B. B., & Alban, B. T. (2006). The 
handbook of large group methods: Creating
             systemic changein organizations and 
communities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J. M. 
(2005). Appreciative inquiry handbook: The first 
in a series of AI workbooks for leaders of 
change. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Hammond, S. A., & Mayfield, A. B. (2004). The 
thin book of naming elephants: How to
             surface undiscussables for greater 
organizational success. Bend, OR: Thin Book
             Publishing.
Kelm, J. B. (2005). Appreciative living: The 
principles of Appreciative Inquiry in personal life. Wake Forest, NC: Venet.
Orem, S. L., Binkert, J., & Clancy, A. L. (2007). 
Appreciative coaching: A positive process for 
change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Owen, H. (1997). Expanding our now: The story of 
Open Space Technology. San Francisco,
             CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Stavros, J. M. & Torres, C. B. (2005). Dynamic 
relationships: Unleashing the power of 
appreciative inquiry in daily living. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute.


*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20080515/d420fd7c/attachment-0015.htm>


More information about the OSList mailing list