doing self-organization
Michael Herman
michael at michaelherman.com
Mon May 28 00:15:40 PDT 2007
many thanks, peggy, harrison, et al...
invitation, for me includes calling and being willing to be called.
being called being the mystery. and 'supporting the invitation' or
'being inviting' is my language for welcoming. and i agree, the
purpose is the thing that comes before. and it's the great challenge
of invitation. what am i called to call out? on some level, in at
least some circumstances, i think the invitation can be rightly
described as a prayer, offered to the mystery of "all of us." over
the last some years i've marvelled at how far i've been able to
stretch the meaning of "invitaion", how many things now fit "inside"
of the "practice" of it... and so interesting here to have these
things teased out and articulated in new words (for me), the old
ordinary words, like welcome, mystery, homework, intention.
m
On 5/27/07, Peggy Holman <peggy at opencirclecompany.com> wrote:
> Such a rich discussion!
>
> I want to introduce a couple themes that stand out for me as we continue to
> form the notions that describes self-organization in social systems.
>
> For me, the practice of opening space brings consciousness to the
> self-organization that is evolution at work. As Harrison said:
> > If we did none of the above, it is quite likely that the system would
> > still
> > perform at some level.
>
> Indeed, if we did nothing, emergence would happen, it just might be quite a
> bit more painful. By doing it mindfully, my belief is that we have the
> chance of tickling out what is wanting to emerge with substantially less
> pain than often accompanies the birth of something new.
>
> For me, the essential core of open space is the invitation to take
> responsibilty for what i/we love. I think we are in a time of completely
> rethinking social behavior that serves in light of a new guiding story (no
> longer Newtonian, but some form of new science). Inviting is part of it.
> Welcoming diversity, disturbance and mystery are also aspects of it. I
> believe that another vital apsect is learning to follow what has heart and
> meaning. Over the last several years, I've discovered that there are those
> who perceive taking responsibility for what you love is as an invitation to
> be selfish - to follow one's own agenda. And I have been in situations
> where the postings in an OS event are just that. It has taught me how
> important it is to create a rich, nutrient environment (with a nod to Stuart
> Kaufman). Or, as Juanita Brown would put it, create hospitable space. When
> these conditons exist, taking responsibility for what one loves becomes an
> egoless act of service on behalf of the whole. It lives at that remarkable
> intersection of one's passion with the needs of the whole.
>
> To Pat's comments about the relational nature of self-organization and
> Ralph's naming of what we are describing as evolution in action, I say yes!
> I think of emergence as the learning edge of evolution. And opening space
> creates the conditions for emergence by inviting the disparate threads
> around some attractive intention to form a new nexus - a new center enabling
> a naming of something which could not previously be named. That interaction
> is evolution speaking through us. We are the midwives. And all evolution
> happens through interaction, which, of course, requires relationship. I
> love the image of nexus - the coming together to form new centers through
> disparate aspects rubbing up against each other in unexpected ways. In
> fact, as I've wondered about a name for the field that describes our work of
> supporting whole systems to interact, I grabbed on to a term used by my
> co-author, Steve Cady, in jest: Nexustentialism. (Doesn't that make you
> grin?)
>
>
> I want to name a couple qualities of invitation that I notice at work.
> First, I am more and more drawn to invitations that show up as inquiries.
> For me, the value of questions is that they focus our attention, bound from
> the inside, and invite us into mystery. They focus by providing direction -
> letting us know the nature of the call. Rather than focus coming through
> declarations, which frequently leave no room for anyone else, they provide
> the masculine archetype of direction without its more punishing -
> do-it-my-way quality.
>
> Questions bound by acting as an attractor, drawing towards them those who
> care about the call. And in that attraction, a loose edge forms, allowing
> people to put a toe in without being trapped by boxes - rules and
> regluations that define what can be said or done. Because they create a
> natural boundary, they shape a safe space for us to be together - in
> relationship - with all of our lovely, quirkly and challenging differences.
> After all, we wouldn't be in that space if we hadn't felt the call.
>
> And, of course, if there isn't the deep, dark entry into mystery -
> archetypical of the feminine, there is no space for novelty to emerge.
>
> In this union of the masculine and feminine, there is very hospitable
> space, bounded by both direction and mystery.
>
>
> I'd add one other element that for me, preceeds invitation. And that is
> uncovering intention. What is the purpose for coming together? What gives
> it meaning? The more an invitation invokes an aspiration that attracts, the
> more fertile its potential.
>
> Guess that's it for now.
>
> Thanks, Michael, for starting the conversation and Harrison, Pat, and others
> for engaging with it.
>
> from rainy Seattle,
> Peggy
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Harrison Owen" <hhowen at verizon.net>
> To: <OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU>
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 1:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [OSLIST] doing self-organization
>
>
> > Pat Wrote: "To refer back to Harrison's statement I don't think you can
> > enable it or sustain it. I think all of creation is the an expression of
> > it."
> >
> > No question in my mind Pat, we do not "create self-organization." It is.
> > But
> > I really do believe that we can learn to use it, to optimize it, and to
> > sustain it. More to the point, I think that is precisely what we all have
> > been learning to do for 20 years with OST. I presume you would have no
> > problem in talking about "Optimizing and sustaining life." And mutates
> > mutandis -- the same applies to self-organization, which after all is what
> > life is all about, at least a fundamental level.
> >
> > For sure we know how to screw it up (which also teaches us what NOT to
> > do).
> > Terminal screw up occurs every time we attempt to organize a
> > self-organizing
> > system -- or control it, which amounts to the same thing.
> >
> > And I think we have been learning a lot about how to make it (SO,Life,Open
> > Space) sing. It starts with Invitation, comes to a circle, includes
> > passion
> > and responsibility etc. Or something.
> >
> > Harrison
> >
> > Harrison Owen
> > 7808 River Falls Drive
> > Potomac, Maryland 20854
> > Phone 301-365-2093
> > Skype hhowen
> > Open Space Training www.openspaceworld.com
> > Open Space Institute www.openspaceworld.org
> > Personal website www.ho-image.com
> > OSLIST: To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the
> > archives Visit: www.listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: OSLIST [mailto:OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU] On Behalf Of Pat
> > Black
> > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 1:52 PM
> > To: OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> > Subject: Re: doing self-organization
> >
> > Michael et al
> > First of all thank you for this discussion. You can't have self
> > organization without open space and probably you can't have open space
> > with out self organization. But I love the rolling around of thoughts
> > in these regards. I love the mystery of creation that is revealed.
> > I come at self organization from a biological science perspective. In
> > creation self organization does enable high performance, sustaining
> > life and evolution or leading change in organization as you put. Some
> > would say that without selforganization there would be no life. Self
> > organization is not an outward event. It is not an abstracted event.
> > It is action in response to experience and the identity transforming
> > that occurs because of this relationship between self and the
> > environment self occurs in. It does in its essence make life
> > possible. In looking at the organization of a cell and what is
> > possible, self organization facilitates the association and
> > configurationof lipids and proteins that allow the passage of certain
> > materials into the cell. In the case of the living each action the
> > living entity takes changes the environment that the entity is in.
> > This would create a toxic environement for living to be sustained if
> > not for this dynamic relationship between self and environement. This
> > is what self organization is. It is a presence to be in the place
> > where it is. It is a presence that allows transformation in a
> > transforming environment. It is a presence that recognizes
> > possibility and enters into relationship with it. Varela would call
> > it the mindfulness found in Buddhist tradition and the the fundamental
> > cognition. Self organization is what makes even a molecule possible
> > and everything else in creation possible. For me it is like a fractal
> > that is fundamental to everything and defines creation and is
> > integrated into all that is created.
> >
> > To refer back to Harrison's statement I don't think you can enable it
> > or sustain it. I think all of creation is the an expression of it.
> > So for me it is more how to remain the most synchronized with it and
> > therefore with myself. Individual entities can I suppose intefere
> > with the process or presence but not without causing their own death.
> > Even if one eliminates their own self organizing abilities and cause
> > their death, their physical form will be included in the possibility
> > of something else in creation. Like I said I just don't think that
> > anything can be separated from it because we are it even in our own
> > deaths.
> >
> > I guess what I hear when you say that you like to enable high
> > preformance, sustain life in neighborhood communities, leading change
> > in organizations, or other purposes is that you like to work at the
> > macro level. In reading your posts and some of your writings I
> > speculate that in your work with groups of people that you try to be
> > present for the group in a capacity that facilitates creation,
> > identity, transformation, possibility. I am thinking that if my
> > specualtion about you is correct you name what you do a little
> > deferently. From where I view it, I would name it an expression of
> > self organization.
> >
> > I am totally a believer that is certain from this post and part of
> > what I love about the topic is the implications it has. If this is
> > true and self organization is fundamental to creation and us as part
> > of creation what implications does it have for how we view actions in
> > the world like violence lest say? What implications are there for how
> > we work in community if any? Self organization is on some level the
> > seed for intelligence. It has helped me view the workings of the
> > world as intelligent in that they all lead down a path. This view
> > helps me to descripe the path and do specualte where it might lead. I
> > am wondering where that kind of wondering will lead?
> >
> > Love to be present for this conversation.
> > pat black
> > On 5/24/07, Michael Herman <michael at michaelherman.com> wrote:
> >> and harrison... looking back at your language about essentials, "the
> >> process of self organization
> >> can be enabled and sustained by paying careful attention to eight
> > critical"
> >>
> >> ...it occurs to me that i'm not much interested in "the process of
> >> self-organization... enabling it... or sustaining it. more interested
> >> in enabling high performance, sustaining life in neighborhood
> >> communities, leading change in organization, or other purposes... but
> >> no doubt this issue is only popping up because this bit you've posted
> >> is taken out of context, so it's lost the links to these and all the
> >> other "good" things that we would ever want to invite. i imagine that
> >> high performance and the rest are already wrapped up inside of what
> >> you mean when you say 'self-organization' above.
> >>
> >> m
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/24/07, Michael Herman <michael at michaelherman.com> wrote:
> >> > hi doug,
> >> >
> >> > seems to me that your first question assumes halfway state. "if there
> >> > is such a thing as self-org" then leaves open the question of whether
> >> > or not there is anything else. once we notice that it is, AND is
> >> > everywhere, then the need for knowing or creating the conditions seems
> >> > to dissolve, maybe into harrison's beer. we need to know more,
> >> > perhaps, if we want to make a better beer, but probably not about the
> >> > "conditions" for refrigeration, but about refrigeration as the
> >> > condition for beer. so the conditions that matter are the conditions
> >> > for high performance or productive work. and when we ask that, i
> >> > think we can quickly dissolve most of what people say into what
> >> > happens in our principles and law and circle and invitation and...
> >> >
> >> > inviting, like marshall rosenberg's 'non-violent communication,
> >> > emphasizes choice. invitation is request for attention, not demand.
> >> > even in writing an invitation with a leader/sponsor, i'm not ever
> >> > trying to make the invitation go a certain way, but i do invite
> >> > attention (theirs) to focus on various bits of what i'm
> >> > hearing/sensing in them and their situation, exploring the 'rightness"
> >> > of these bits to see what dimensions of everything they'd like to
> >> > invite others to focus on with them.
> >> >
> >> > my two cents.
> >> >
> >> > m
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 5/24/07, douglas germann <76066.515 at compuserve.com> wrote:
> >> > > Michael, Harrison, Joelle, Andrew, Pat, Raffi, and all--
> >> > >
> >> > > (Sorry for the previous posting--somehow hit the send key before I
> >> > > was
> > done.)
> >> > >
> >> > > Would you be interested in entertaining a couple of musing questions?
> >> > >
> >> > > If (some people in command and control mode might still use the word
> >> > > "if") there is such a thing as self organizing, what would be its
> >> > > conditions?
> >> > >
> >> > > This seems to be to be a fruitful inquiry, and it goes beyond
> >> > > our usual important, complex, diverse, conflict, immediacy
> > list.
> >> > > For me it perhaps overlaps but is not precisely the same as
> >> > > Harrison's list of 8 essentials.
> >> > >
> >> > > For instance, is invitation necessary for self
> >> > > organizing? What level of freedom? What order of
> >> > > equality of the participants? Are there physical
> >> > > conditions? Or is it just two or more gathering?
> >> > >
> >> > > Closely related: What is the difference between trying to control
> >> > > what
> > a
> >> > > group does and inviting? (Harrison, you hinted at this in a post
> >> > > today
> >> > > when you say "I believe that there is an infinitely better
> >> > > possibility
> >> > > through which we may discover deep ways to realize our full potential
> > as
> >> > > human beings, as well as doing something very useful and good in the
> >> > > world.") Is it simply a matter of degree, or is the difference
> >> > > qualitative?
> >> > >
> >> > > For instance, when Birgitt writes of "givens," or I
> > help
> >> > > someone write the theme for their invitation, we are
> >> > > consciously directing the attention of the
> > participants
> >> > > to something we want to examine or change. So for
> >> > > instance, we are inviting people to make positive
> > change
> >> > > in the area of X, or to explore the issues and
> >> > > opportunities of X, and this necessarily takes their
> >> > > attention off Y, Z, Q and J.
> >> > >
> >> > > :- Doug.
> >> > >
> >> > > *
> >> > > *
> >> > > ==========================================================
> >> > > OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> >> > > ------------------------------
> >> > > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> >> > > view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
> >> > > http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
> >> > >
> >> > > To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
> >> > > http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Michael Herman
> >> > Michael Herman Associates
> >> > 300 West North Ave #1105
> >> > Chicago IL 60610 USA
> >> >
> >> > phone: 312-280-7838
> >> > email: michael at michaelherman.com
> >> > skype: globalchicago
> >> >
> >> > http://www.michaelherman.com
> >> > http://www.openspaceworld.org
> >> > http://www.chicagoconservationcorps.org
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Michael Herman
> >> Michael Herman Associates
> >> 300 West North Ave #1105
> >> Chicago IL 60610 USA
> >>
> >> phone: 312-280-7838
> >> email: michael at michaelherman.com
> >> skype: globalchicago
> >>
> >> http://www.michaelherman.com
> >> http://www.openspaceworld.org
> >> http://www.chicagoconservationcorps.org
> >>
> >> *
> >> *
> >> ==========================================================
> >> OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> >> ------------------------------
> >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> >> view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
> >> http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
> >>
> >> To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
> >> http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
> >>
> >
> > *
> > *
> > ==========================================================
> > OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> > ------------------------------
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> > view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
> > http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
> >
> > To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
> > http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
> >
> > *
> > *
> > ==========================================================
> > OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> > ------------------------------
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> > view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
> > http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
> >
> > To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
> > http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
>
> *
> *
> ==========================================================
> OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> ------------------------------
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
> http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
>
> To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
> http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
>
--
Michael Herman
Michael Herman Associates
300 West North Ave #1105
Chicago IL 60610 USA
phone: 312-280-7838
email: michael at michaelherman.com
skype: globalchicago
http://www.michaelherman.com
http://www.openspaceworld.org
http://www.chicagoconservationcorps.org
*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
More information about the OSList
mailing list