Facilitator must be part of the conversations

[Chris Corrigan]

Hi Doug...

There are levels of hosting and facilitating in these processes.  In
Conversation Cafes, World Cafes and Open Space meetings there are
facilitators who are responsible for the overall space and there are hosts
within the space that take responsibility for the conversations.  In OST we
call thes folks conveners (or we use other names) and in the Cafes they call
them table hosts.

I think in general its a good idea to have the overall event facilitator
"hold space" and to have the hosts within the gathering take as much
responsibility as possible for the outcomes.  The advantages of doing it
this way are clearly that passion bounded by responsibility gets things
done.

I am not entrenched on the question of whether the OST facilitator can or
cannot participate in the event.  There are many factors that come into
play.  In events I have done within my community, where the community has
had some previous exposure to OST, I am perfectly comfortable opening space
and then participating.  It seems that the groups is able to hold space for
all just fine.  In other places, where a client is doing something
completely strange (apprenticeships, post-secondary education policy,
sustainability planning for an unfamiliar community) then I just sit on the
edges, taking care of the space, helping with the proceedings, answering
questions and talking about the process with the curious.

And still other times, when there are a team of facilitators to help hold
space, I feel more free to participate, especially if the work is with
people close to me.

I think the question is, what are the benefits of having space holders at
all levels?

Chris

On 7/30/07, douglas germann <76066.515 at compuserve.com> wrote:
>
> Hi--
>
> Peggy Holman's Change Handbook has a description of Conversation Cafés,
> which raises the question: why would it be good for the facilitator to
> take part in the conversation? What would be the advantages of taking
> part?
>
> After all, it appears that the host in Conversation Cafés does take
> part, in circle process does take part, and in The World Café may take
> part in the conversations.
>
> The risks it seems to me: the facilitator is seen as the one with the
> answers, simply because of standing at the front/center of the room; the
> temptation, even subconsciously, to push your own agenda because of that
> standing position.
>
> But the advantages might outweigh: one more voice heard; a more
> inclusive whole to the group.
>
> We seem to avoid taking part in the conversations: Harrison takes a nap;
> Michael only does it in a middle time slot.
>
> Could we have a conversation about why it would be good to participate,
> please?
>
>                         :- Doug.
>
> *
> *
> ==========================================================
> OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> ------------------------------
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
> http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
>
> To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
> http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
>



-- 
CHRIS CORRIGAN
Facilitation - Training
Open Space Technology

Weblog: http://www.chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot
Site: http://www.chriscorrigan.com

Principal, Harvest Moon Consultants, Ltd.
http://www.harvestmoonconsultants.com

*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20070730/e2b864be/attachment-0016.htm>