OSonOS is important - was Hierarchy...

[Deborah Hartmann]

A reflection on re-engaging mainstream with margins, from a recent OST 
event:

Someone noticed that a core subject had not been raised during the first 
day of the event. It was puzzling - how could an event on this theme not 
address the ongoing puzzle of this particular subject? At morning news 
(as facilitator, inviting people to speak) I said something like: Are 
there subjects not raised yet that, perhaps, the "oldtimers" here have 
tired of banging their heads against? I remind you that we have new 
faces here today, and fresh ideas: I invite you to try again.

The subject was finally engaged in an informal lunchtime session, 
outside in the sun. And later, it was continued inside in another 
session. To the amazement of some, headway was made where none had been 
found previously. It was exciting, to me, to see a leader re-energized, 
who seemed to have given up hope of finding true collaborators on this 
subject. I believe a couple of folks left the event early to take action 
on the plans they'd hatched (since they were, for a brief moment, all in 
the same geographic place and could start face-to-face). A sort of 
natural convergence!

I also wrote about the effect of combining beginners and experts in a 
single event in this article:
http://www.infoq.com/articles/open-space-beginners-experts
(warning: it's IT domain specific, so contains jargon. But I suspect you 
can read around the jargon and still understand the article, as it's 
about how people interacted at the event, not really about the technical 
topics themselves).

These experiences suggest to me that OSonOS is an important aspect of 
the life of this community - that we should "walk the talk" and level 
our own playing field, making opportunities for more senior and 
brand-new members, and all in between, to engage as equals and spark new 
and important things. It seems that this has naturally emerged in the 
Stammtisch, OSonOS and WOSonOS events. Being a senior or junior member 
of the community seems less likely, in my opinion, to result in 
disparity while we are practicing the democratizing effect of the circle 
ourselves.

These comments likely reflect my own perceptions and optimism as a more 
"junior" member of the community. Can those more experienced confirm my 
hunch?

deb

Raffi Aftandelian wrote:
> Hi all, again!
>
> This thread reminds me of a question posed by a trainer in an OST
> mini-learning workshop last year:
>
> "Is there a mainstream and a margins in the OST practitioner community?"
>
> He was referring to the work of Arnold Mindell, founder of process
> psychology, and his work with rank and diversity. One strong indicator of
> the health of any group is how well the mainstream (the majority
> tone/perspective/culture) integrates and engages with the marginalized.
>
> I think he really meant to ask "How would you describe how the mainstream
> engages the margins in the OST practitioner community?"
>
>
> Raffi
>   
-- 

Deborah Hartmann
Agile Process Coach
deborah dot hartmann DOT net

"Learn the principle, 
abide by the principle, and 
dissolve the principle." 
-- Bruce Lee

*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist