Mixing action planning and

Mon Feb 26 08:38:33 PST 2007

Hello Diane,

This is a wonderful overview of when and how to use both approaches, 
and gives me a clearer understanding of the reasons for choosing each 
one.

Thank you to everyone who replied. You are all so generous with your 
experience and support!

I'll let you know how it goes this weekend... I am really looking 
forward to it.

Best regards,
--Beverley

On Feb 25, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Diane Gibeault wrote:

> Hi Beverly and all,
>
> Reopening space for action: I also use that approachy but I do it only 
> in certain conditions.
>> - When dealing with a group that does not constitute an intact 
>> (existing) organization. For example in many conferences neither the 
>> sponsor organization nor other participating organizations intend to 
>> take responsibility for fthe overall follow-ups.  
>>
>> - Where the theme is centered on learning and individual development.
>>
>> - When I am sure the leadership is open to the particular outcomes of 
>> this approach (opening space for action) which is very different then 
>> first surveying what the group feels are the priorities for the 
>> organization. (see the desciption * of that process below.) Some 
>> sponsors/leaders feel that organizational resources, time and money 
>> can only be committed to a limited number of initiatives. Or, they 
>> want some sequencing of initiatives, beginning with those topics that 
>> require attention first according to the group as a 
>> whole.Disadvantages of opening the space again for action that intact 
>> organizations have pointed to:
>> - Priorities for action were that of individuals or a few, often the 
>> more extraverted people, not necessarily representative of where the 
>> leadership or the majority of people may want to go.. The 
>> organization preferred investing its resources and energy on 
>> priorities based on a clear indication from all members present. They 
>> wanted to know what collectively was considered the priorities to act 
>> on and then to identify who had passion and leadership to act on 
>> those priorities.
>>
>> - Some felt there was a lack of focus, actions going in every 
>> direction - no organizational vision.
>>
>> - Concern that limited resources may not be available for everything 
>> individuals may have passion for.
>>
>> - Where trust is an issue, it may be more of a challenge for 
>> participants to propose topics for action. Posting a topic is not 
>> just for discussion, it’s for action so the method demands more of a 
>> stand. It's greater risk taking, not knowing what the leadership or 
>> the group considers to be priorities.To reopen space for action:
>> - If the organization is willing to let participants pursue their own 
>> personal passion on any of the topics discussed or anything as a 
>> result of the experience they are now inspired to work on, the 
>> question I often use is: What do I now have energy and passion to 
>> work on?
>>
>> - People who want to take action on someting of interest to them post 
>> a topic for action. 
>>
>> - An action planning guide similar to what others have described is 
>> given to every participant to help them focus on plannning for 
>> action, individually or in small groups. Then there is a reporting to 
>> the larger group that takes different forms depending on the 
>> circumstances and needs.* Surveying first what the group feels are 
>> the priorities for the organization (summary of the process I use):
>> - Participants read reports with this question in mind: What are the 
>> top (three or more) priority topics you feel, we as an organization 
>> should act on now?
>>
>> - Answers create a collective survey. After a quick compilation of 
>> results of this survey is announced, leaders meet (15 minutes at the 
>> most) to consult and see if they feel the proposed priorities fit 
>> with the organizational vision, are doable and resource wise and 
>> confirm that they will support them.
>>
>> - During that time participants identify other related reports to the 
>> priorities and note the report numbers on a sheet attached to each 
>> priority flip chart page.
>>
>> - Leaders give feedback on priorities and answer questions of 
>> clarification if any.
>>
>> - Then, people choose which of the collective priorities they have 
>> passion to work on - they are action planning knowing clearly they 
>> have the full support of the leadership.
>>
>> - The option of action planning on other areas is still offered in 
>> recognition that all the work done so far is important and that 
>> someone may not have passion for the collective priorities still may 
>> make positive contributions.In my experience, both methods of 
>> identifying priorities for action work best when the method chosen is 
>> the right one to meet the group's needs and preferences.
>
> Diane
>  
>  
> Diane Gibeault & Associé.es-Associates
> Ottawa, Canada Tel. (613) 744-2638
> www.dianegibeault.com
>  
>  
> Coming up - À noter
>  
> Open Space (OST) English Training: April 25-27, Toronto Canada
>  
> Forum ouvert (OST) & WC Formation-français : 27-28, 29-30, Suisse

*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

>From  Mon Feb 26 11:45:09 2007
Message-Id: <MON.26.FEB.2007.114509.0500.>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:45:09 -0500
Reply-To: hhowen at verizon.net
To: OSLIST <OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU>
From: Harrison Owen <hhowen at verizon.net>
Organization: HH Owen and Co.
Subject: Re: Mixing action planning and
In-Reply-To: <LKEHLECIABMIPLPMHMOIEEDDCJAA.diane.gibeault at rogers.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01C7599B.94B63300"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C7599B.94B63300
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Diane wrote: - “Priorities for action were that of individuals or a few,
often the more extraverted people, not necessarily representative of where
the leadership or the majority of people may want to go.. The organization
preferred investing its resources and energy on priorities based on a clear
indication from all members present. They wanted to know what collectively
was considered the priorities to act on and then to identify who had passion
and leadership to act on those priorities.”

I have run into the same concern, which is why I still think some form of
formal prioritization can work well. Granted this often looks like voting,
but I am not sure that voting is such a bad thing. The actual mechanism for
doing this can be as simple as pasting sticky-dots – or as complex as a
ballot with weighted scores. We used to have a nice software package that
recorded and tallied the votes and reported the results as bar graphs.
Somehow it developed a bug – but maybe some techie sort could fix it? Or
make a new one?? Anyhow, with large groups (over 100) I always found it
worked very well, and for sure it made the engineers and other “numbers”
people happy. At a practical level, counting sticky-dots can be an
eye-popping affair when the group size hits 500+. In those cases, having the
computer do all the work is a wonderful thing.

Harrison

Harrison Owen

7808 River Falls Drive

Potomac, Maryland   20854

Phone 301-365-2093

Skype hhowen

Open Space Training  <http://www.openspaceworld.com/> www.openspaceworld.com

Open Space Institute  <http://www.openspaceworld.org/>
www.openspaceworld.org

Personal website  <http://www.ho-image.com/> www.ho-image.com 

OSLIST: To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives
Visit:  <http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html>
www.listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

-----Original Message-----
From: OSLIST [mailto:OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU] On Behalf Of Diane
Gibeault
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 6:45 PM
To: OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
Subject: FW: Mixing action planning and

Hi Beverly and all,

Reopening space for action: I also use that approachy but I do it only in
certain conditions. 

- When dealing with a group that does not constitute an intact (existing)
organization. For example in many conferences neither the sponsor
organization nor other participating organizations intend to take
responsibility for fthe overall follow-ups.  

- Where the theme is centered on learning and individual development. 

- When I am sure the leadership is open to the particular outcomes of this
approach (opening space for action) which is very different then first
surveying what the group feels are the priorities for the organization. (see
the desciption * of that process below.) Some sponsors/leaders feel that
organizational resources, time and money can only be committed to a limited
number of initiatives. Or, they want some sequencing of initiatives,
beginning with those topics that require attention first according to the
group as a whole. 

Disadvantages of opening the space again for action that intact
organizations have pointed to:

- Priorities for action were that of individuals or a few, often the more
extraverted people, not necessarily representative of where the leadership
or the majority of people may want to go.. The organization preferred
investing its resources and energy on priorities based on a clear indication
from all members present. They wanted to know what collectively was
considered the priorities to act on and then to identify who had passion and
leadership to act on those priorities. 

- Some felt there was a lack of focus, actions going in every direction - no
organizational vision.

- Concern that limited resources may not be available for everything
individuals may have passion for.

- Where trust is an issue, it may be more of a challenge for participants to
propose topics for action. Posting a topic is not just for discussion, it’s
for action so the method demands more of a stand. It's greater risk taking,
not knowing what the leadership or the group considers to be priorities. 

To reopen space for action: 

- If the organization is willing to let participants pursue their own
personal passion on any of the topics discussed or anything as a result of
the experience they are now inspired to work on, the question I often use
is: What do I now have energy and passion to work on? 

- People who want to take action on someting of interest to them post a
topic for action. 

- An action planning guide similar to what others have described is given to
every participant to help them focus on plannning for action, individually
or in small groups. Then there is a reporting to the larger group that takes
different forms depending on the circumstances and needs.

* Surveying first what the group feels are the priorities for the
organization (summary of the process I use):

- Participants read reports with this question in mind: What are the top
(three or more) priority topics you feel, we as an organization should act
on now?

- Answers create a collective survey. After a quick compilation of results
of this survey is announced, leaders meet (15 minutes at the most) to
consult and see if they feel the proposed priorities fit with the
organizational vision, are doable and resource wise and confirm that they
will support them. 

- During that time participants identify other related reports to the
priorities and note the report numbers on a sheet attached to each priority
flip chart page.

- Leaders give feedback on priorities and answer questions of clarification
if any.

- Then, people choose which of the collective priorities they have passion
to work on - they are action planning knowing clearly they have the full
support of the leadership. 

- The option of action planning on other areas is still offered in
recognition that all the work done so far is important and that someone may
not have passion for the collective priorities still may make positive
contributions. 

In my experience, both methods of identifying priorities for action work
best when the method chosen is the right one to meet the group's needs and
preferences. 

Diane

Diane Gibeault & Associé.es-Associates

Ottawa, Canada Tel. (613) 744-2638

www.dianegibeault.com <http://www.dianegibeault.com/> 

Coming up - À noter

Open Space (OST) English Training: April 25-27, Toronto Canada

Forum ouvert (OST) & WC Formation-français : 27-28, 29-30, Suisse

* * ==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU ------------------------------ To subscribe,
unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of
oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about
OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C7599B.94B63300
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>

<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)">

<style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
	{font-family:Tahoma;
	panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
p
	{margin-right:0in;
	margin-left:0in;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.Style1, li.Style1, div.Style1
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.EmailStyle20
	{font-family:Arial;
	color:red;
	font-weight:normal;
	font-style:normal;
	text-decoration:none none;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>

</head>

<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=blue>

<div class=Section1>

Diane wrote: - “Priorities for action
were that of individuals or a few, often the more extraverted people, not
necessarily representative of where the leadership or the majority of people
may want to go.. The organization preferred investing its resources and energy
on priorities based on a clear indication from all members present. They wanted
to know what collectively was considered the priorities to act on and then to
identify who had passion and leadership to act on those priorities.”

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=red face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'> </span></font></p>

I have run into the same concern, which is
why I still think some form of formal prioritization can work well. Granted
this often looks like voting, but I am not sure that voting is such a bad
thing. The actual mechanism for doing this can be as simple as pasting
sticky-dots – or as complex as a ballot with weighted scores. We used to
have a nice software package that recorded and tallied the votes and reported
the results as bar graphs. Somehow it developed a bug – but maybe some
techie sort could fix it? Or make a new one?? Anyhow, with large groups (over
100) I always found it worked very well, and for sure it made the engineers and
other “numbers” people happy. At a practical level, counting
sticky-dots can be an eye-popping affair when the group size hits 500+. In
those cases, having the computer do all the work is a wonderful thing.

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=red face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'> </span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=red face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'>Harrison</span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=red face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'> </span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=red face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'> </span></font></p>

<div>

<p align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=2 color=red face=Arial><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'>Harrison Owen</span></font></p>

<p align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=2 color=red face=Arial><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'>7808 River Falls Drive</span></font></p>

<p align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=2 color=red face=Arial><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'>Potomac,
Maryland   20854</span></font></p>

<p align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=2 color=red face=Arial><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'>Phone </span></font><font size=2 color=red face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;
 color:red'>301-365-2093</span></font></p>

<p align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=2 color=red face=Arial><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'>Skype hhowen</span></font></p>

<p align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3 color=red face=Arial><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'>Open Space Training</span></font><font
color=red><span style='color:red'> <a href="http://www.openspaceworld.com/"><font
face=Arial><span style='font-family:Arial'>www.openspaceworld.com</span></font></a>
</span></font></p>

<p align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3 color=red face=Arial><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'>Open Space Institute</span></font><font
color=red><span style='color:red'> <a href="http://www.openspaceworld.org/"><font
face=Arial><span style='font-family:Arial'>www.openspaceworld.org</span></font></a></span></font></p>

<p align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3 color=red face=Arial><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'>Personal website</span></font><font
color=red><span style='color:red'> <a href="http://www.ho-image.com/"><font
face=Arial><span style='font-family:Arial'>www.ho-image.com</span></font></a> </span></font></p>

<p align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3 color=red face=Arial><span
 style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'>OSLIST</span></font><font
color=red face=Arial><span style='font-family:Arial;color:red'>: To subscribe,
unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives Visit: </span></font><font
color=red><span style='color:red'><a
href="http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html"><font face=Arial><span
style='font-family:Arial'>www.listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html</span></font></a></span></font></p>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=red face=Arial><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:red'> </span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>-----Original Message-----<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span></b> OSLIST
[mailto:OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU] <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>On
Behalf Of </span></b>Diane Gibeault<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Sunday, February 25, 2007
6:45 PM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> FW: Mixing action
planning and</span></font></p>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>

<p style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Hi Beverly and all,</span></font></p>

Reopening space for action: I also use
that approachy but I do it only in certain conditions.

<blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'>

- When dealing with a group that does not constitute
an intact (existing) organization. For example in many conferences neither the
sponsor organization nor other participating organizations intend to take
responsibility for fthe overall follow-ups.

- Where the theme is centered on learning and
individual development.

- When I am sure the leadership is open to the
particular outcomes of this approach (opening space for action) which is very
different then first surveying what the group feels are the priorities for the
organization. (see the desciption * of that process below.) Some
sponsors/leaders feel that organizational resources, time and money can only be
committed to a limited number of initiatives. Or, they want some sequencing of
initiatives, beginning with those topics that require attention first according
to the group as a whole.

</blockquote>

<p style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Disadvantages of opening the space again for action that
intact organizations have pointed to:</span></font></p>

<blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'>

- Priorities for action were that of individuals or a
few, often the more extraverted people, not necessarily representative of where
the leadership or the majority of people may want to go.. The organization preferred
investing its resources and energy on priorities based on a clear indication
from all members present. They wanted to know what collectively was considered
the priorities to act on and then to identify who had passion and leadership to
act on those priorities.

<p style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>- Some felt there was a lack of focus, actions going
in every direction - no organizational vision.</span></font></p>

<p style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>- Concern that limited resources may not be available
for everything individuals may have passion for.</span></font></p>

- Where trust is an issue, it may be more of a
challenge for participants to propose topics for action. Posting a topic is not
just for discussion, it’s for action so the method demands more of a
stand. It's greater risk taking, not knowing what the leadership or the group
considers to be priorities.

</blockquote>

<p style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>To reopen space for action: </span></font></p>

<blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'>

- If the organization is willing to let participants
pursue their own personal passion on any of the topics discussed or anything as
a result of the experience they are now inspired to work on, the question I
often use is: What do I now have energy and passion to work on?

<p style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>- People who want to take action on someting of
interest to them post a topic for action. </span></font></p>

- An action planning guide similar to what others
have described is given to every participant to help them focus on plannning
for action, individually or in small groups. Then there is a reporting to the
larger group that takes different forms depending on the circumstances and
needs.

</blockquote>

<p style='margin-left:.5in'><strong><b><font size=2 face=Arial><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>* Surveying first what the group
feels are the priorities for the organization </span></font></b></strong><font
size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>(summary of
the process I use):</span></font></p>

<blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'>

<p style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>- Participants read reports with this question in
mind: What are the top (three or more) priority topics you feel, we as an
organization should act on now?</span></font></p>

- Answers create a collective survey. After a quick
compilation of results of this survey is announced, leaders meet (15 minutes at
the most) to consult and see if they feel the proposed priorities fit with the
organizational vision, are doable and resource wise and confirm that they will
support them.

<p style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>- During that time participants identify other
related reports to the priorities and note the report numbers on a sheet
attached to each priority flip chart page.</span></font></p>

<p style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>- Leaders give feedback on priorities and answer
questions of clarification if any.</span></font></p>

- Then, people choose which of the collective
priorities they have passion to work on - they are action planning knowing
clearly they have the full support of the leadership.

- The option of action planning on other areas is
still offered in recognition that all the work done so far is important and
that someone may not have passion for the collective priorities still may make
positive contributions.

</blockquote>

In my experience, both methods of identifying
priorities for action work best when the method chosen is the right one to meet
the group's needs and preferences.

<p style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Diane</span></font></p>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><strong><b><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Diane
Gibeault & Associé.es-Associates</span></font></b></strong></p>

</div>

<div>

Ottawa, Canada Tel. (613)
744-2638

</div>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><a
href="http://www.dianegibeault.com/">www.dianegibeault.com</a></span></font></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><strong><b><font size=2 color=navy
face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Coming
up - À noter</span></font></b></strong></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><strong><b><font size=1
color=green face=Arial><span style='font-size:7.5pt;font-family:Arial;
color:green'>Open Space (OST) English Training: April 25-27, Toronto Canada</span></font></b></strong></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><strong><b><font size=1
color=green face=Arial><span style='font-size:7.5pt;font-family:Arial;
color:green'>Forum ouvert (OST) & WC Formation-français : 27-28, 29-30,
Suisse</span></font></b></strong></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>

</div>

</div>

</body>

</html>
*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
------=_NextPart_000_0018_01C7599B.94B63300--