What to do with 1.5 to 2 hours
Peggy Holman
peggy at opencirclecompany.com
Wed Apr 18 13:00:28 PDT 2007
Larry,
You said:
We closed the session with a half-hour fishbowl conversation of initiators and reporters that did transcend reporting back and got into good conversation (not presentation) with new insights.
I'm intrigued with this approach as a very creative way of handling the desire that often exists to hear what happened in the room.
Would you say more about this - what sparked the idea, how many were in the fishbowl (half hour isn't a lot of time and with 200 people, I'm imagining there were a fair number of sessions), what question did you use to launch the fishbowl?
appreciatively,
Peggy
----- Original Message -----
From: Larry Peterson
To: OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 11:49 AM
Subject: [OSLIST] What to do with 1.5 to 2 hours
This week, I worked with a client, as many before, who wanted an event that began with substantial sharing of new ideas and information about telemedicine. Few of the close to 200 participants really knew what the possibilities were and so telling that story was key and it took a couple of hours in the morning. There was not sufficient time nor was there willingness on the part of the sponsor and his board to use OST for the afternoon - the board members believed it was too open. There was willingness to have an hour or more of "self-organizing discussion". I have encountered this before with Canadians frightened of the openness of OST. So, I do not call it open space and we are not sitting in a circle. However, I asked emergent leadership with regard to the theme question to identify a topic of interest (passion) and to ensure a report is written up. I didn't invoke the principles and law but encouraged people to go where they had some interest. Flip charts with letters were around the room. It took 20 minutes to get the leadership and topics out (on flip chart and projection on the screen) and then folks went to discussion for a bit less than an hour. Good discussions, good energy. We closed the session with a half-hour fishbowl conversation of initiators and reporters that did transcend reporting back and got into good conversation (not presentation) with new insights. I do not call that OST, even thought I learned if from OST practice. For me, two rounds and more "space" are important for the synergy and depth of OST to emerge - its much better in a day. However, it worked really well for this kind of discussion in a short time frame.
Thought I'd share the story.
Larry Peterson
Associates in Transformation
Toronto, ON, Canada
416.653.4829
larry at spiritedorg.com
www.spiritedorg.com
* * ========================================================== OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20070418/4e6a5afa/attachment-0016.htm>
More information about the OSList
mailing list