Turtles (short)

Harrison Owen hhowen at comcast.net
Mon Feb 14 08:14:53 PST 2005


Alan wrote" If the people involved in the system are not organizing it, then
who is? If the response is "the boss", then the boss is part of the system
and so the system is still self-organizing. And, in any case, each member
(at leasteach living member) of the system is making ongoing choices about
how they will organize themselves in response to the rest of the system.

Very good point, Alan. And when The Boss actually believe his/her Press,
that is one Boss in deep trouble. The situation is no less dire with the
people (employees), but quite understandable. After all if everybody was
inherently involved in the process, everybody would be responsible. And then
who would you blame?

Harrison

Harrison Owen
7808 River Falls Drive
Potomac, Maryland   20845
Phone 301-365-2093

Open Space Training www.openspaceworld.com
Open Space Institute www.openspaceworld.org
Personal website http://mywebpages.comcast.net/hhowen/index.htm
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives Visit:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html



-----Original Message-----
From: OSLIST [mailto:OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU] On Behalf Of Alan Klein
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 10:31 AM
To: OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
Subject: Re: Turtles (short)

If the people involved in the system are not organizing it, then who is? If
the response is "the boss", then the boss is part of the system and so the
system is still self-organizing. And, in any case, each member (at least
each living member) of the system is making ongoing choices about how they
will organize themselves in response to the rest of the system.

Physical objects are part of the scenery. Sure they form limitations on the
choices we make, but half of an infinite range of choices is still an
infinite range of choices!

~Alan Klein

-----Original Message-----
From: Artur Silva
1. You refer often to Kaufman's conditions for self-organization. Clearly
those conditions are NOT current and they occur only in special situations.
So it seems to me that there is a contradiction between your references to
those conditions and your persistent affirmations that "there is not such
thing as a non-self-organizing-systems". Can you clarify your thoughts about
this please?

2.  I agree with Masud that the statement is true for "living systems". So
when we consider the humans as part of an ecosystem we can see them as a
"living systems". But human organizations are not only "living material".
Masud gave an example with the financial system, but there are others. An
organization is a mix of living people with objects, rules, procedures,
hierarchies, etc that are not "living" in the biological sense. Those rules
and procedures inhibit, in my opinion, their being "living systems". That's
is precisely the reason why we talk about opening the space - the fact that
quite often in organizations and even in communities the space is pretty
closed. Any comments?

*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist



More information about the OSList mailing list