Givens (was: Already-there ness, Empowerment and Such)
Chris Corrigan
chris at chriscorrigan.com
Sun Mar 2 10:14:28 PST 2003
That's great to know Bernd! Amazing the stories we tell ourselves.
"Science won't let us fly yet." I suppose they were right, but only by
three weeks!
Chris
---
CHRIS CORRIGAN
Consultation - Facilitation
Open Space Technology
Bowen Island, BC, Canada
http://www.chriscorrigan.com
chris at chriscorrigan.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OSLIST [mailto:OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU] On Behalf Of WB-
> TrainingConsultingDevelopment
> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 6:15 AM
> To: OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> Subject: Re: Givens (was: Already-thereness, Empowerment and Such)
>
> Chris,
>
> Yes, I agree - of course - with your main point.
>
> and the N. Y. Times article was based on a declaration of some quite
> eminent physicists
> who made that basic error to believe, that, what they can not
imagine,
> can not happen.
>
> They did not say: "actual physics (=our map) does not see any
possibility
> for flying"
> They said: "it is impossible to fly"
>
> So they were fundamentally wrong, although on the top of their
science
>
> Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OSLIST [mailto:OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU]On Behalf Of
Chris
> Corrigan
> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 6:32 AM
> To: OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> Subject: Re: Givens (was: Already-thereness, Empowerment and Such)
>
> Yes Bernd, my point was that the Wright brothers, having fully
> understood the givens, figured out how to fly. I recently read that
> only weeks before they did this, the New York Times published an
> editorial saying that humans would never fly. Seems to me to be a
prime
> example of what I'm talking about.
>
> This case is in fact an eloquent example of what I mean now when I
say
> that the real "givens" are empowering and the false ones are
> disempowering. Dealing with real givens, we can work around them,
bring
> to bear all the creativity and ingenuity of the human spirit alone or
in
> groups to figure out solutions that include and transcend the givens.
> But I believe that the hardest givens to overcome are the ones that
> aren't even real: the stories we tell ourselves about why we can't do
> things. In that case, empowerment finally comes when one sees that
the
> stories are simply stories, and not reality at all.
>
> To put it on a bumper sticker, it's the difference between "givens"
and
> "give-ins"
>
> Eh?
>
> Chris
>
>
> ---
> CHRIS CORRIGAN
> Consultation - Facilitation
> Open Space Technology
>
> Bowen Island, BC, Canada
> http://www.chriscorrigan.com
> chris at chriscorrigan.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: OSLIST [mailto:OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU] On Behalf Of
WB-
> > TrainingConsultingDevelopment
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 6:44 AM
> > To: OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> > Subject: Re: Givens (was: Already-thereness, Empowerment and Such)
> >
> > Has nothing to do with open space,
> > just a note for science-metaphor using freeks:
> > ------------
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > I like your argument
> > but your example is only good in the sense of a metapher.
> >
> > f you look at the real history of technology, the Wright- brothers'
> (and
> > other genial technical engeneer's) approach was not the one you
> > described. Yet they flew.
> > The point is, that you forgot that there was another fact-or in the
> game
> > you unduely reduced complexity
> > Air: they did not invent ballistic rockets (for which your argument
> would
> > be right)
> > But they used aerodynamics against gravity in their art (greek:
> téknè) of
> > flying
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:14:18 -0800, Chris Corrigan wrote:
> > Without getting esoteric, one can WANT to fly, but if one advances
> > efforts to do so without admitting that gravity is a force to be
> > reckoned with, one won't get very far. However, if one accepts
that
> > gravity is real and can be absolutely known and that it is a true
> > given, then one can accommodate gravity in one's quest to fly.
"Okay
> > then" one would think, "I need to make something that accelerates
me
> > away from the earth with more force than gravity can exert on me."
> > This is profoundly more empowering thought than "Screw it, gravity
is
> > too strong. I'll never fly." It is more empowering because it
> > actually leads one to flight.
> >
> > *
> > *
> > ==========================================================
> > OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> > ------------------------------
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> > view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu,
> > Visit:
> >
> > http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
>
> *
> *
> ==========================================================
> OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> ------------------------------
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu,
> Visit:
>
> http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
>
> *
> *
> ==========================================================
> OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> ------------------------------
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu,
> Visit:
>
> http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
>
> *
> *
> ==========================================================
> OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
> ------------------------------
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu,
> Visit:
>
> http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu,
Visit:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
More information about the OSList
mailing list