Fighting Open Space Organizations Long
J. Paul Everett
JPESeeker at aol.com
Tue Oct 16 19:43:26 PDT 2001
Another viewpoint I received today. Our media could all calm down, too. Paul
Geov Parrish
WorkingForChange
10.15.01
Terror news
American media is doing the terrorists' work for them
Over this past weekend, my country went crazy.
Americans have always been a little bit crazy, of course, at least in the
eyes of the rest of the world. But reports of new anthrax exposures in Reno,
New York, and Florida have been the signal for a media feeding and
speculation frenzy -- and that, in turn, is coloring a lot of usually
complacent people various shades of hysterical.
A remarkable variety of people I know are reporting alarm and fear in the
past couple of days, in their schools and workplaces and neighborhoods and
families: folks terrified of anthrax, fueled by breathless Internet myths
and conspiracy theories, bullshit detectors turned off, suspicious of anyone
who might look vaguely Arabic or Islamic. And it's almost everyone that's
feeling it, even the most improbable people: immigrants, people of color,
people who have themselves spent their lives decrying things like racial
profiling.
Mass media, especially TV news, has taken the lead in teaching us to fear.
Here in Seattle, as in many parts of the country, envelopes with
unidentified powders that wouldn't have been noticed last week have led to
evacuated buildings. The most widely reported yesterday was at Boeing, and
the lead story on one station's evening news was introduced as follows: "A
possible Anthrax attack at Boeing! The lab reports are in, we'll have the
details..." Only after the commercial break did viewers learn that the tests
were negative and there was no story. In the meantime, viewers were left on
tenterhooks, to marinade in their own dread. That sort of sensationalism is
going on across the country.
In Sunday's newspapers, for example, we got 25 paragraphs into a Washington
Post story summarizing anthrax reports across the country before learning
that the "five more cases in Florida" headline concerned five blood tests,
out of over 1,000 people tested after the American Media exposures, which
came back positive for anthrax antibodies -- after previous, less sensitive
tests had turned up negatives. So what the headline refers to is that out of
a sample size of 1,000, five people had been exposed to the anthrax
bacterium at some point in their lives. What's the exposure rate among, say,
farmers, to this naturally occurring bacterium that shows up routinely in
animals and soil? We weren't told. Chances are good that these lab results
have absolutely nothing to do with any public health concerns or criminal
investigation. And yet, they make scary headlines, and yet again public fear
is ramped up a few more notches.
Based on what is known -- and this needs to be said, over and over and
over -- the odds that any single person in this country (including me, and I
have no immune system and work in media) will die from anthrax are
negligible. Negligible. Far lower than my chances of winning the lottery.
And I don't play. The chances that any non-white person "exhibiting
suspicious behavior" is a bin Laden operative also approach nil -- dozens,
at best, out of billions of people. (The chances that said person is afraid
of being lynched, on the other hand, are depressingly high.)
War hysteria is a new phenomenon in the United States, at least since World
War II on the West Coast. Beyond statements that we'll be embarrassed about
next year, we need to recognize it for what it is because it's not
politically neutral. War hysteria encourages the scapegoating of people who
look like anyone's conception of "the enemy" -- just as harsh new
"anti-terrorist" attacks on civil liberties are being rammed through
Congress. It encourages support for the bombing of not just Afghanistan, but
any country where association with terrorism can be inferred. Just as Iraq
is being served up by some as our next target. (In the Post story, a
Trenton, New Jersey postmark for the anthrax envelope sent to NBC News was
actually linked to the 1993 World Trade Center bombers' ties to Jersey City,
on the other side of the state. Does this mean we'll be bombing New Jersey
now?)
Most of all, war hysteria leaves the public susceptible to any sort of rumor
or demagoguery. The public knows what political and military leaders and
media talking heads have been reluctant to dwell upon: a small, dedicated,
and low-tech cell of homicidal maniacs has its choice of an endless variety
of ways in which it can kill massive numbers of people in the United States,
or anywhere in the developed world. We're impossibly vulnerable. It's become
something of a parlor game to exchange ideas for easily accomplished mass
murder. (I won't go through a list, but here's just one: take a small, fast
boat, pack it with high explosives, and T-bone a luxury cruise ship in
mid-ocean, a long way from any medical facilities. Those ships have several
thousand well-heeled, decadent Americans on them. How do you defend them?)
This means, of course, that minimizing the chances of future terror attacks
requires actions that have nothing to do with bombing the Taliban or Saddam.
In the short term, we need to increase the effectiveness of domestic
security, beef up emergency management plans, work internationally with
police, intelligence agencies, and international courts. In the longer term,
we need to take a hard look at foreign and economic policies which have in
some cases contributed to the Third World desperation that permeates the
fertile recruiting grounds for psychotic ideologues like bin Laden. But
during war hysteria, how much of that will actually happen?
We got a lot of empty, puffed-chest idiocy after September 11's attacks,
reminding us that America is strong and resilient and can't be cowed by
terrorism. Terrorists, we were told, win only if our lives are changed by
our terror, and we wouldn't let that happen. Osama bin Laden's video last
weekend, vowing that Americans would feel fear, was widely written off as
evil hyperbole.
And yet, here we are, a few days later, and the country is unraveling over a
threat that is, so far, pretty minor in the catalog of this world's
miseries. The networks and White House went through an absurd dance last
week, the networks agreeing (among other things) to censor tapes of bin
Laden so as not to expose us viewers to his words. But intentionally or not,
the terrorists behind these anthrax incidents -- if they are even the work
of bioterrorists, which we don't know for sure -- are winning. Their weapon
is not biochemistry, but the obsession of American "news" reporting with
aiming for the strongest possible emotional jolt to its viewers or readers,
no matter how irresponsible. American media is doing the terrorists' work
for them.
After a decade in which U.S. media saturated the world with nonsense like
O.J. and Elian, if terrorists are out there choosing their weapons, it's
hard to believe that their use of our media's irrepressible money-driven
instinct to scare its audience is an accident. Capitalism and the logic of
the marketplace has come to war: for the first time in human history, the
targets of an attack have chosen the weapon of our destruction by popular
demand. The terrorists are giving us what the networks long ago decided we
want.
If this is, in fact, how things are intended to play out, I'm awestruck at
the genius and simplicity of the idea -- and horrified by our
defenselessness. I don't expect that U.S. media will change its ways and go
all responsible on us. I also don't expect that opportunistic politicians
and companies, who may have their own reasons for whipping up our terror,
will step back and realize that they're doing Evil's work for it. If we are
to avoid war, if we are to avoid being manipulated into losing the very
freedoms we're supposedly mobilizing to defend, if we are in fact being
attacked with the goal of putting each of us in perpetual dread, our only
true defense for that is each other and our own good sense. Stacked up
against the power of modern U.S. propaganda -- now being unwittingly used as
a weapon of war against its residents -- I'm feeling pretty uneasy myself,
about where this is heading.
*
*
==========================================================
OSLIST at LISTSERV.BOISESTATE.EDU
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of oslist at listserv.boisestate.edu,
Visit:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
More information about the OSList
mailing list